Hi,
On 30 Вер 2009, at 23:30, dmitry grebeniuk wrote:
Repository hosting is not fast -- it's my own
home host, 256kbit/s outgoing only. I haven't found
any acceptable hosting for this kind of project.
freehg.org is buggy with heavy downtimes,
bitbucket.org won't host such a big repository,
goo
Hello.
I have an OCaml / MinGW / Win32 build system
that I've described in the post
http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2009/09/1e88034bf03350ad0488a20dce729f79.en.html
For now, it is a mercurial repository with http pull
access with url
http://gdsfh.dyndns.org:8000/
(so you can clone
> Using one work stealing deque per core is much more efficient than the work
> sharing queue you described for two reasons:
>
> 1. Less global syncronization.
>
> 2. Subtasks are likely to be executed on the core that spawned them, which
> improves cache efficiency.
You could also create larger t
2009/9/30 Stéphane Glondu :
> Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen a écrit :
> Actually, I find the typing discipline enforced by the monadic
> abstraction very helpful (and elegant).
For some purposes - for example filtering and transforming large data
sets, but perhaps less so for ad hoc tasks like backgroun
Matías,
I have a problem where the shortcuts the cygwin installer creates aren't
recognized by windows. If you go to your bin/ directory and copy
gcc-3.exe to gcc.exe (replacing the shortcut), perhaps that will help.
Jeff
___
Caml-list mailing list.
I hope this is germane, I am very new to Ocaml.
Do these help at all?
http://packages.debian.org/sid/libxml-light-ocaml-dev
http://tech.motion-twin.com/xmllight.html
I expect it wouldn't be to difficult to write a wrapper around libxml
http://xmlsoft.org/index.html
-Jordan
_
On Wednesday 30 September 2009 02:08:06 Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen wrote:
> 2009/9/27 Jon Harrop :
> > On Sunday 27 September 2009 20:23:13 kche...@math.carleton.ca wrote:
> >> If Grand Central Dispatch makes its way
> >> into *nix...
> >
> > Incidentally, what exactly (technically) is Grand Central a
Richard Jones wrote:
On the other hand, the code is hard to understand. It's not clear to
me what the .( ) syntax means, nor why there is an apparently trailing
/ character.
From the manual:
If the x-expression e evaluates to an x-sequence, the construction e/
will result in a new x-sequenc
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 04:49:37PM +0200, Gerd Stolpmann wrote:
> No. However, there is a little XPath evaluator in SVN:
> https://godirepo.camlcity.org/svn/lib-pxp/trunk/src/pxp-engine/pxp_xpath.ml
Cool, and you have even already implemented all of the XPath 1.0
standard library!
> I have never
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 04:51:01PM +0200, Alain Frisch wrote:
> Richard Jones wrote:
> > let devs = {{ map [xml] with
> >| [[[_]]]
> >| [[[_]]] ->
> >[s]
> >| _ -> [] }} in
>
> The following should work:
>
> let l = {{ [xml] }} in
> let l = {{ map l with l -> l | _ -> [] }}
Richard Jones wrote:
let devs = {{ map [xml] with
| [[[_]]]
| [[[_]]] -> [s]
| _ -> [] }} in
The following should work:
let l = {{ [xml] }} in
let l = {{ map l with l -> l | _ -> [] }} in
let l = {{ map l with l -> l | _ -> [] }} in
let l = {{ map l with l -> l | _ -> []
Am Mittwoch, den 30.09.2009, 15:39 +0200 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 01:17:45PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> > I need to do some relatively simple extraction of fields from an XML
> > document. In Perl I would use xpath, very specifically if $xml was an
> > XML document
If I am not mistaken you are selecting a domain whose first child is a
device node whose only child is disk node ...
instead of:
[[[_]]]
you should aim for something in the vein of:
[_* ( ((|
_)* |_)* _*]
Till
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Richard Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 a
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 09:33:07AM -0400, Till Varoquaux wrote:
> OCamlduce (Alain correct me if I am wrong) basically maintains two
> separate type systems side by side (the Xduce one and the Ocaml one).
> This is done in order to make Ocamlduce maintainable by keeping a
> clear separation. As a r
Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen a écrit :
> But this requires the function to be designed in a clean way and
> conform to certain monadic rules, and getting it wrong creates a mess
> in the type errors.
Actually, I find the typing discipline enforced by the monadic
abstraction very helpful (and elegant).
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 01:17:45PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> I need to do some relatively simple extraction of fields from an XML
> document. In Perl I would use xpath, very specifically if $xml was an
> XML document[1] stored as a string, then:
>
> my $p = XML::XPath->new (xml => $xml);
OCamlduce (Alain correct me if I am wrong) basically maintains two
separate type systems side by side (the Xduce one and the Ocaml one).
This is done in order to make Ocamlduce maintainable by keeping a
clear separation. As a result you have to explicitly convert values
between type systems using {
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 12:57:23PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 04:05:03AM -0700, Dario Teixeira wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ocamlduce has been mentioned before in this thread, but I didn't catch
> > the reason why it has been discarded as a solution. Is it because you
> > don
First, sorry for the rough post (it was late), I see some typos and
slightly more confusing mistakes, but hopefully not too bad, or please
ask.
>> A function can push other functions to the global queue. This in
>> effect creates a continuation, and the concept is similar to
>> continuation passin
09/03/2009 04:05 PM, Edgar Friendly:
8) Other (please explain)
Some hints (I just saw it in my INBOX, I dont agree nor disagree):
http://www.itworld.com/open-source/78643/how-attract-more-people-your-open-source-project
--
Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat:
Administratio
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 04:05:03AM -0700, Dario Teixeira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ocamlduce has been mentioned before in this thread, but I didn't catch
> the reason why it has been discarded as a solution. Is it because you
> don't want to carry the extra (large) dependency, or is there some other
> rea
Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen a écrit :
> A function can push other functions to the global queue. This in
> effect creates a continuation, and the concept is similar to
> continuation passing style or LWT threads, *but requires no
> continuation arguments to drag around*.
Could you elaborate?
Best re
Hi,
Ocamlduce has been mentioned before in this thread, but I didn't catch
the reason why it has been discarded as a solution. Is it because you
don't want to carry the extra (large) dependency, or is there some other
reason?
And on the subject of simple XML parsers for Ocaml, there's also the
a
2009/9/30 Richard Jones :
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 01:00:15AM +0200, Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen wrote:
>> In line with what Yaron suggests, you can use a combinator parser.
> It's interesting you mention xmlm, because I couldn't write
> the code using xmlm at all.
If you can manage to convert an xml
> The discussion here has got quite theoretical, but it's not helping
> me to write the original 3 lines of Perl in OCaml.
>
> my $p = XML::XPath->new (xml => $xml);
> my @disks = $p->findnodes ('//devices/disk/source/@dev');
> push (@disks, $p->findnodes ('//devices/disk/source/@file'));
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 01:00:15AM +0200, Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen wrote:
> In line with what Yaron suggests, you can use a combinator parser.
>
> I do this to parse json, and this parser could be adapted to xml by
> focusing on basic syntax and ignoring the details, or you could
> prefilter xml an
Dawid Toton wrote:
I have lot of modules and they are compiled to native code.
So I have .cmx and .o files and want to link them faster.
Is is possible to make linking an associative operation acting on modules?
[...]
Documentation of ld says that files produced with --relocatable can be
used as
27 matches
Mail list logo
