[Caml-list] Problem using camlp4o on windows.

2009-01-27 Thread Ed Keith
; "in"; m = a_UIDENT; e = expr; "do"; seq = sequence; "done" -> <:expr< $uid:m$.iter (fun $lid:v$ -> $seq$) $e$ >> ] ] ; END and complied it with the command line: C:\Documents and Settings\Ed Keith\My Do

Re: Re : [Caml-list] Problem using camlp4o on windows.

2009-01-27 Thread Ed Keith
That solved the problem. Thank you very much. -EdK Ed Keith e_...@yahoo.com Blog: edkeith.blogspot.com --- On Tue, 1/27/09, Matthieu Wipliez wrote: From: Matthieu Wipliez Subject: Re : [Caml-list] Problem using camlp4o on windows. To: caml-l...@inria.fr Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Re: [Caml-list] The new OCaml book (Objective Caml Programming Language by Tim Rentsch)

2009-03-04 Thread Ed Keith
Something seems to be wrong with the list, this is the 18th copy of this one message I have received! I am receiving 2 to 4 copies of most messages. -EdK Ed Keith e_...@yahoo.com Blog: edkeith.blogspot.com --- On Mon, 3/2/09, Jon Harrop wrote: From: Jon Harrop Subject: Re: [Caml-list

Re: [Caml-list] when OO is wrong

2009-03-30 Thread Ed Keith
+ and Ocaml. I am not forced to fit a square peg into a round hole. I can use procedural, functional or o-o techniques, depending on which is a better fit for the problem. I do wish I had better tools for visualizing FP designs. I use Nassi-Schneiderman diagram for procedural designs and UML

Re: [Caml-list] when OO is wrong

2009-03-31 Thread Ed Keith
--- On Tue, 3/31/09, Oliver Bandel wrote: > Quoting "Jon Harrop" : > > On Monday 30 March 2009 23:38:45 Ed Keith wrote: > >> I do wish I had better tools for visualizing FP designs. I use > >> Nassi-Schneiderman diagram for procedural designs and

Re: [Caml-list] Re: LLC book [was: Questions]

2009-04-02 Thread Ed Keith
ml newbie I could bring a useful perspective to the project. I hope I can be of service, -EdK Ed Keith e_...@yahoo.com Blog: edkeith.blogspot.com ___ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailma

Re: [Caml-list] OCaml and Boehm

2009-04-11 Thread Ed Keith
e at the earliest possible point when, in fact, they typically keep > values alive longer than necessary. Could elaborate on this? I'm having a hard time envisioning a situation where GC could free memory that smart pointers would not free. -EdK Ed Keith e_...@yah

[Caml-list] Manipulation objet files

2009-07-17 Thread Ed Keith
m not sure yet) and the .o files generated by mingw (I think there are a.out files, but am not sure yet). Does anyone know of such a library, or have any experience in this area that might be helpful. Thank you, -EdK Ed Keith e_...@yahoo.com Blog: edkeith.blogspo

[Caml-list] Unable to reach fixpoint building ocaml 3.11.2 on cygwin

2010-01-26 Thread Ed Keith
ap three times, with the same result each time then I repeated the whole process, and again got the same results. Can anyone give me any advice? -EdK Ed Keith e_...@yahoo.com Blog: edkeith.blogspot.com ___ Caml-list mailing list. Sub

Re: [Caml-list] Unable to reach fixpoint building ocaml 3.11.2 on cygwin

2010-01-26 Thread Ed Keith
--- On Tue, 1/26/10, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > From: Goswin von Brederlow > Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Unable to reach fixpoint building ocaml 3.11.2 on > cygwin > To: "Ed Keith" > Cc: caml-l...@inria.fr > Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 10:42 AM > Ed Keith

Re: [Caml-list] Unable to reach fixpoint building ocaml 3.11.2 on cygwin

2010-01-26 Thread Ed Keith
--- On Tue, 1/26/10, Ed Keith wrote: > From: Ed Keith > Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Unable to reach fixpoint building ocaml 3.11.2 on > cygwin > To: "Goswin von Brederlow" > Cc: caml-l...@inria.fr > Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 2:00 PM > --- On Tue, 1/26/10,

Re: [Caml-list] Unable to reach fixpoint building ocaml 3.11.2 on cygwin

2010-01-26 Thread Ed Keith
--- On Tue, 1/26/10, Alain Frisch wrote: > From: Alain Frisch > Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Unable to reach fixpoint building ocaml 3.11.2 on > cygwin > To: "Ed Keith" > Cc: caml-l...@inria.fr > Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 2:42 PM > On 26/01/2010 16:19, Ed

Re: [Caml-list] camlp4

2010-02-06 Thread Ed Keith
ecided to stick with camlp5 until there is documentation available for camlp4. It appears to me that they are similar enough that skills with camlp5 will be transferable to camlp4 when documents becomes available. -EdK Ed Keith e_...@yahoo.com Blog: edkeith.blogspot.com __

Re: [Caml-list] about OcamIL

2010-05-05 Thread Ed Keith
second class citizens. Until this changes Ocaml will never be a main stream language. F# may eat it's lunch. But F# is tied to Windows, Ocaml has the potential to be multi-platform. I just wish it would live up to this potential. -EdK Ed Keith e_...@yahoo.com Blog: e

Re: [Caml-list] about OcamIL

2010-05-06 Thread Ed Keith
--- On Wed, 5/5/10, ben kuin wrote: > From: ben kuin > Subject: Re: [Caml-list] about OcamIL > To: "Ed Keith" , caml-list@yquem.inria.fr > Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 6:18 PM > keith, a few thoughts, ... before > I've worked with linux I was a > windows

RE: [Caml-list] about OcamIL

2010-05-14 Thread Ed Keith
er excellent > performances. > > I have benchmarks where the JVM is well over 10x slower > than .NET. So I do > not regard any JVM-based language as "high performance". I have never used it, but I believe Scala works with .NET. -EdK

Re: [Caml-list] about OcamIL

2010-05-15 Thread Ed Keith
for the JVM to be a problem), but if your code is memory or CPU intensive a VM may be unaceptable. -EdK Ed Keith e_...@yahoo.com Blog: edkeith.blogspot.com ___ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin

Re: [Caml-list] Re: Is OCaml fast?

2010-11-24 Thread Ed Keith
t this to mean that the rules are purely arbitrary and capricious with no though behind them? I hope I am misinterpreting this statement, but can think of no other interpretation -EdK Ed Keith e_...@yahoo.com Blog: edkeith.blogspot.com _