Nice! You should also go through the documentation, it's pretty bad at
the moment...
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 5:07 PM, _why <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 01:05:54PM +0200, Magnus Holm wrote:
>> Man, that's way better than removing 135 bytes! I *love* the implementation!
>
> I
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 01:05:54PM +0200, Magnus Holm wrote:
> Man, that's way better than removing 135 bytes! I *love* the implementation!
I have always wanted to use Method#to_proc in Camping.
> Alright! What about releasing 2.0? I've closed a lot of tickets on the
> tracker, and I don't think
Then I'm +1.
Can't wait to see my tests fail with 2.0 (I will obviously have to
update Mosquito for the new version, although if we still have .run
it should
work unmodified).
On Jun 24, 2008, at 3:14 PM, Magnus Holm wrote:
R isn't gone! Feel free to use both (and if you use R, it would no
R isn't gone! Feel free to use both (and if you use R, it would not
add more routes:
module Camping::Controllers
class Index;end
class Advanced < R '/(some regex';end
# /advanced will NOT route to Advanced
end
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Julik Tarkhanov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doe
Does that mean we are losing the possinility for multiple routes per
controller and such?
Or should I return something magic from self.urls to make controllers
function the pre-2.0 way?
On Jun 24, 2008, at 1:05 PM, Magnus Holm wrote:
Alright! What about releasing 2.0? I've closed a lot of t
Man, that's way better than removing 135 bytes! I *love* the implementation!
Alright! What about releasing 2.0? I've closed a lot of tickets on the
tracker, and I don't think we need more for a 2.0. There is no point
of waiting anymore, IMO!
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:14 AM, _why <[EMAIL PROTECTE
6 matches
Mail list logo
