On Tue, May 12, 2020, at 22:32, Bob Harold wrote:
> > How does the capport wg feel as a whole about this question? [MAC as
> > identifier]
>
> I am also wondering the same thing.
We did discuss this, if I recall. From memory, there were a few reasons not to
go further:
MAC randomization mea
Hello,
Thanks for the quick feedback
On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 15:25, S Moonesamy wrote:
>
> I took a quick look at the draft. The third paragraph in the
> Introduction section states that the document standardizes an
> architecture for implementing captive portals. Does it meant that
> this dra
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 8:10 AM Kyle Larose wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> Thanks for the quick feedback.
>
> > I am curious why section 3.4 does not consider the MAC Address as a
> possible identifier?
>
> Its omission doesn't mean that the MAC Address is not a valid
> identifier. One should evaluate it u
Hi Bob,
Thanks for the quick feedback.
> I am curious why section 3.4 does not consider the MAC Address as a possible
> identifier?
Its omission doesn't mean that the MAC Address is not a valid
identifier. One should evaluate it using the criteria provided in 3.2
and 3.3. When I wrote the skele
f.org"
, "captive-portals@ietf.org"
, "barryle...@gmail.com"
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Last Call:
(CAPPORT Architecture) to
Informational RFC
Editors, I've opened a few issues on the comments Subash indicated were still
pending. I think that we can take
guess so) Or does it coordinate with it? –
> [Resolved, Please ignore]
>
>
>
> *From: *Captive-portals on behalf of
> Bob Harold
> *Date: *Monday, May 11, 2020 at 10:35 AM
> *To: *"last-c...@ietf.org"
> *Cc: *"capport-cha...@ietf.org" ,
> &
Hello,
At 09:54 AM 11-05-2020, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Captive Portal Interaction WG
(capport) to consider the following document: - 'CAPPORT Architecture'
as Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comment
-c...@ietf.org"
Cc: "capport-cha...@ietf.org" ,
"draft-ietf-capport-architect...@ietf.org"
, "captive-portals@ietf.org"
, IETF-Announce ,
"barryle...@gmail.com" , Martin Thomson
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Last Call:
(CAPPORT Architecture) to
Infor
I am curious why section 3.4 does not consider the MAC Address as a
possible identifier?
--
Bob Harold
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 12:56 PM The IESG wrote:
>
> The IESG has received a request from the Captive Portal Interaction WG
> (capport) to consider the following document: - 'CAPPORT Archite
The IESG has received a request from the Captive Portal Interaction WG
(capport) to consider the following document: - 'CAPPORT Architecture'
as Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comme
10 matches
Mail list logo
