Hi Amila,
Just wondering why the method getSAML2Attribute() accepts the same
parameter twice? Is this different in other places, or can't we get rid of
one parameter?
Thanks,
Senaka.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Please remove the year from the license
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Please remove the year from the license header.
Will do.
Also, do you think it is a good idea to add a test case for this fix?
To reproduce this issue we need to have a hosted service in ESB or AS
(secured with SAML policy)
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Senaka Fernando sen...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Amila,
Just wondering why the method getSAML2Attribute() accepts the same parameter
twice? Is this different in other places, or can't we get rid of one
parameter?
Method is used more than once in the code. Thus the
Hi Azeez,
Yes we need to add a test case to cover this. Currently we do not have any
test cases that covers the functionality of Configurable Governance
Artifacts. Therefore we will add a test case to cover all these aspects.
Thanks,
Janaka
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Afkham Azeez
Hi All,
In-order to fix [1] we need to patch Axiom. But currently we are not
maintaining an Axiom local branch.
How should we proceed with this ?
The relevant Axiom issue is in [2] and the fix for the issue is in
Axiom-1.2.3-SNAPSHOT.
Thanks
AmilaJ
[1] https://wso2.org/jira/browse/CARBON-11163
Hi All,
I have noticed the following exception from a trunk G-Reg pack. This
happened when I tried to refresh a page after about 1 hour. Any idea about
the cause for this issue.
[2012-01-11 13:01:10,492] INFO
{org.wso2.carbon.core.services.util.CarbonAuthenticationUtil} - 'admin'
logged in at
Hi
BTW The pack I had was somewhat old one(maybe 2 weeks). Im in the process
of building a new pack. Will let you know if the issue exists in latest
pack too.
Thanks,
Janaka
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Janaka Ranabahu jan...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have noticed the following
Are you getting the same error for all subsequent logins?
If so, what happen when you restart the server login back?
What is the page your trying to refresh.
By looking @ the stacktrace, I could not find any particular JSP tag being
faulty.
/sumedha
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Janaka
Hi All,
Made the necessary changes to the service module of following products.
1. AS
2. ESB
3. G-Reg
4. BRS
Now the Jar Signing is skipped unless you activate it using mvn GOALS *
-Dprofile=signJar* command.
Thanks and Regards,
Harshana
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Afkham Azeez
Hi Sumedha,
I did not try that. My first thought was that this might be some error in
my local pack. So I started building a new pack. I sent the mail to find
out whether anyone else had experienced the same thing.
Also note that I was using a pack which was there in the
---
WSO2 Carbon Trunk WSO2 Carbon - Platform Trunk #92 failed.
---
Code has been updated by amani, dimuthul.
2/7769 tests failed, 1 failure was new.
I am looking into this
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Bamboo cbuil...@wso2.org wrote:
[image: Failed] WSO2 Carbon
Trunkhttp://builder4.us1.wso2.org:/bamboo/browse/WSO2CARBONTUNK/› WSO2
Carbon - Platform
Hi all,
We looked at this. None of commits mentioned by Bamboo is in carbon core.
Perhaps this is a intermittent test failure. I am not getting this test
failure with local build. Does anyone else get this error?
thanks,
dimuthul
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Amani Soysa am...@wso2.com
Hi AmilaJ,
Shall we check whether there will be an Axiom release before next Carbon
major release?
Thanks,
Thilina
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Amila Jayasekara ami...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi All,
In-order to fix [1] we need to patch Axiom. But currently we are not
maintaining an Axiom
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Thilina Buddhika thili...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi AmilaJ,
Shall we check whether there will be an Axiom release before next Carbon
major release?
Will do.
Thanks
AmilaJ
Thanks,
Thilina
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Amila Jayasekara ami...@wso2.com wrote:
Versions are updated and committed to trunk.
Thanks
AmilaJ
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Thilini Ishaka thil...@wso2.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Amila Jayasekara ami...@wso2.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Thilini Ishaka thil...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi Krishantha,
We need to discuss this sometime this week. We have some issues related to
mounting, and we need to write automation tests for those as well as
several other aspects. I'd like to explain a nearly similar model which I
have used to test caching. But mounting is a little complicated
Hi all,
I am planning to remove the forked off OpenId4J code and use the released
0.9.6 OpenID4J library.
Please shout if any concerns.
thanks,
dimuthu
--
Dimuthu Leelarathne
Technical Lead
WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
email: dimut...@wso2.com
Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
ServerAdminTestCase failure is intermittent. But SchemaTest failure was
introduced by a commit. It was fixed, but I don't know why it is still
failing.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Dimuthu Leelarathne dimut...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi all,
We looked at this. None of commits mentioned by Bamboo
---
WSO2 Carbon Trunk WSO2 Carbon - Platform Trunk #93 was successful.
---
Code has been updated by denis, rajika, harshana, amilaj, dimuthul, lalaji,
---
WSO2 Carbon Trunk WSO2 Carbon - Platform Trunk #95 failed.
---
Code has been updated by harshana, waruna.
No failed tests found, a possible compilation
Please ignore this for the moment. I have manually stopped the process till
platform version update
completes.
Thanks.
/Harshana
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Bamboo cbuil...@wso2.org wrote:
[image: Failed] WSO2 Carbon
+1, We have already configured test framework to setup product platform
with registry mounts and run test against the mounted product setup in
bamboo machine (only five products yet). But we don't have specific tests
for registry mounts. Normally we run governance API test on the setup. Lets
Hi All,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Nirmal Fernando nir...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Amila,
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Nirmal,
Is it the only place affected by this?
Further analysis shown the same error in following:
commons-vfs2
Hi All,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Harshana Martin harsh...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Azeez,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Afkham Azeez az...@wso2.com wrote:
Harshana,
Can you globally change the Carbon version please? Let's do this before
we unfreeze SVN.
Sure.. Will do the necessary
+1.
Thanks,
Sameera.
On Wednesday, January 11, 2012, Nirmal Fernando nir...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi All,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Nirmal Fernando nir...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Amila,
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Amila Maha Arachchi ami...@wso2.com
wrote:
Hi Nirmal,
Is it the only place
---
WSO2 Carbon Trunk WSO2 Carbon - Platform Trunk #96 failed.
---
Code has been updated by harshana.
9/7692 tests failed.
---
WSO2 Carbon Trunk WSO2 Carbon - Platform Trunk #97 failed.
---
Code has been updated by harshana, senaka.
9/7692 tests failed, no failures were new.
Carbon core p2 profile generation failed for me as carbon.product metadata
file in core/p2-profile-generation still points to the version
3.2.0-SNAPSHOT. Not sure whether that has any impact on this.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Srinath Perera srin...@wso2.com wrote:
Harshana,
I am not
please make sure you turn it back when you have finished.
--Srinath
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Harshana Martin harsh...@wso2.com wrote:
Please ignore this for the moment. I have manually stopped the process
till platform version update
completes.
Thanks.
/Harshana
On Wed, Jan 11,
Hi folks.
How I can $subject in AS 4.1.2?
Saludos,
Ing. Jorge Infante Osorio.
J´Dpto Soluciones SOA.
CDAE.
Fac. 5.
UCI.
Fin a la injusticia, LIBERTAD AHORA A NUESTROS CINCO COMPATRIOTAS QUE SE
ENCUENTRAN INJUSTAMENTE EN PRISIONES DE LOS EEUU!
http://www.antiterroristas.cu
Hi Jorge,
2012/1/12 Jorge Infante Osorio jorg...@uci.cu
Hi folks.
** **
How I can $subject in AS 4.1.2?
Follow the same steps provided in article [1] .
[1].
http://wso2.org/library/articles/2012/01/configuring-jms-transport-in-wso2-business-process-server-bps
Regards,
Dinusha.
Hi Dinusha. I do it like in [1] but I don´t know if I miss something, I want
to subscribe several DS to a single topic in ActiveMQ, how I can configure
that?.
Like in [1] I do the steps from 1 to 5 of Configure to Communicate WSO2 BPS
with Active MQ, with the AS in my case.
In this
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Srinath Perera srin...@wso2.com wrote:
Harshana,
I am not sure, but does changing carbon trunk properties lead to the
build failure .. problem is test looking for a pack that is not there?
Yes. Since I haven't changed the p2 maven plugins property file
Hi Harshana,
At the same time please note that
$CARBON_HOME/components/mediators/target-mediator/pom.xml still has
3.2.0-SNAPSHOT as the parent's version. We'll need to update that also.
Thanks and regards,
SanjayaV.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Harshana Martin harsh...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi Sanjaya,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Sanjaya Vithanagama sanja...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi Harshana,
At the same time please note that
$CARBON_HOME/components/mediators/target-mediator/pom.xml still has
3.2.0-SNAPSHOT as the parent's version. We'll need to update that also.
Thanks for
---
WSO2 Carbon Trunk WSO2 Carbon - Platform Trunk #98 failed.
---
Code has been updated by prabatha.
9/7692 tests failed, no failures were new.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Sanjaya Vithanagama sanja...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi Harshana,
At the same time please note that
$CARBON_HOME/components/mediators/target-mediator/pom.xml still has
3.2.0-SNAPSHOT as the parent's version. We'll need to update that also.
Done!
Thanks and
Hi,
Can we get $subject?
AFAIU, it is not related to jaggery, and I believe it is already done... We
need it to design some UIs to monitor a large amount of server nodes...
--
Regards,
Tharindu
blog: http://mackiemathew.com/
M: +9459908
___
Hi Tharindu,
We have committed gadget tag implementation into trunk only.We haven't
committed those modifications to 3.2.0 branch yet.Hence gadget tag
implementation is not still available to use with 3.2.4.
I'll add those modifications to branch and let you know once it's finished.
Thanks;
On
40 matches
Mail list logo
