Folks,
Is the body optional for HTTP 200 OK messages? In other words, is the
following response valid?
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1
Content-Length: 0
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 07:40:56 GMT
Thanks!
Charitha
___
Carbon-dev mailing list
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Charitha Kankanamge chari...@wso2.comwrote:
Folks,
Is the body optional for HTTP 200 OK messages? In other words, is the
following response valid?
Yes. This is a valid response [1]. Specially, response to a HEAD request
always comes without an entity
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Charitha Kankanamge chari...@wso2.comwrote:
Folks,
Is the body optional for HTTP 200 OK messages? In other words, is the
following response valid?
HTTP entity is always optional regardless of the status code.
Thanks,
Hiranya
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server:
Hello everyone :
We want to develop some sample features of our own ,and try to install
these features into the Carbon products.And I 've read the article about
Create your own Carbon Component under the link
Hello everybody:
I'm new to wso2 governance registry and I need to build a distribution
from source code.
I downloaded source code for WSO2 Governance Registry in its 3.0.0
version (from web page, not from svn)
I've compilated isolated modules, but I'm not able to do a whole
distribution by
Hi Roberto,
Could you paste the exception that you are getting?
2010/10/7 Roberto Mier Escandón rmescan...@gmail.com
Hello everybody:
I'm new to wso2 governance registry and I need to build a distribution
from source code.
I downloaded source code for WSO2 Governance Registry in its 3.0.0
Hi Roberto,
1. extract the pack and go to products/greg directory and run mvn clean
install !
If you are getting a build error please paste it here !
Lahiru
2010/10/7 Roberto Mier Escandón rmescan...@gmail.com
Hello everybody:
I'm new to wso2 governance registry and I need to build a
That is exactly what I was finally planning to do. So, resource resolution
should be done inside my authz manager. I thought there was a neater way to
do it.
Thanks,
Danushka
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Amila Jayasekara ami...@wso2.com wrote:
It seems to be you need to have a mapping
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura danus...@wso2.comwrote:
Amila,
Anyways the issue is not about negative permissions. It can even be
something like let role A create queues that have names starting with
Temp_ as you just mentioned. How can we have something like that in
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Amila Suriarachchi am...@wso2.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura
danus...@wso2.comwrote:
Amila,
Anyways the issue is not about negative permissions. It can even be
something like let role A create queues that have names
Obviously we can not integrate these permission models. The only thing we
need to do is to share the User store between components. In Active
Directory case Carbon uses Active Directory users. But here I think you need
to let JMS Queue to use Carbon users and roles.
+1.
That is exactly
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura danus...@wso2.comwrote:
Obviously we can not integrate these permission models. The only thing we
need to do is to share the User store between components. In Active
Directory case Carbon uses Active Directory users. But here I think you
Hi devs,
Inside my Carbon component I need to impose certain rules to restrict access
to JMS objects. For an example I need to say something like do not let user
A create JMS queues that have names starting with Temp_. I can handle the
rule language myself but how can I get the existing
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura danus...@wso2.comwrote:
Hi devs,
Inside my Carbon component I need to impose certain rules to restrict
access to JMS objects. For an example I need to say something like do not
let user A create JMS queues that have names starting with
It seems to be you need to have a mapping with your rule and a resource
id. Cos in the permission model we authorize based on the resource id
(/x/y/z) etc ... I believe what you have given is only a single example.
Thus there can be many permutations? (like, name ending with Temp_ etc
...).
I will take a svn up and check ...
Indika
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
Are you using latest svn? What is your svn revision??
Samisa...
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Indika Kumara ind...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi all
I am getting following series
Hi Indika,
Can you try getting an update of carbon core?
Thanks
Dimuthu
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote:
Are you using latest svn? What is your svn revision??
Samisa...
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Indika Kumara ind...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi all
Hi Indika,
I'm not 100% certain whether this is correct, but I feel that the reason
could be java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: Found interface
org.wso2.carbon.user.core.tenant.TenantManager, but class was expected. If
this error (this is not an exception but a throwable), was not properly
p2 logs its errors/warnings in
$CARBON_HOME/repository/components/workspace/.metadata/.log file.
Regards,
Saminda
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Srinath Perera srin...@wso2.com wrote:
Hi All;
I am trying to change CSG P2 feature to new release, and process
looked OK, but I am getting
19 matches
Mail list logo
