Nzizno
An
On Nov 9, 2010, at 4:10 PM, Susan Bramhall
wrote:
> I think that is still current practice in uPortal. The version that
> drops the IChannel support altogether will probably get a major
> release number. It sounds like 4.0 is right.
> Susan
>
> On 11/9/2010 4:01 PM, William G.
On Nov 9, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Marvin Addison
wrote:
At 4.0 seems to be consistent with the uP Release Strategy:
https://wiki.jasig.org/display/UPC/Release+Strategy assuming we are
still follow it.
Thanks for pointing that out, Bill. I know different projects have
different standards for v
Y Ip n
On Nov 9, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Scott Battaglia
wrote:
> We typically follow the uPortal one which I believe was based off of
> Apache (which we follow for everything else :-)).
>
> When we set "4.0" as our SAML goal and decided to release the
> required changes earlier rather than late
> If we're going to call it 4.0, then I'd prefer that we scope the Service
> Management changes in and get all of our major API changes in at once.
+1
M
--
You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as:
arch...@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, s
We typically follow the uPortal one which I believe was based off of Apache
(which we follow for everything else :-)).
When we set "4.0" as our SAML goal and decided to release the required
changes earlier rather than later, that's how we came up with the current
numbering versions.
If we're goin
> At 4.0 seems to be consistent with the uP Release Strategy:
> https://wiki.jasig.org/display/UPC/Release+Strategy assuming we are
> still follow it.
Thanks for pointing that out, Bill. I know different projects have
different standards for version number changes, but all the ones I've
seen agre
I think that is still current practice in uPortal. The version that
drops the IChannel support altogether will probably get a major
release number. It sounds like 4.0 is right.
Susan
On 11/9/2010 4:01 PM, William G. Thompson, Jr. wrote:
At 4.0 seems to
At 4.0 seems to be consistent with the uP Release Strategy:
https://wiki.jasig.org/display/UPC/Release+Strategy assuming we are
still follow it.
Bill
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Scott Battaglia
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Marvin Addison
> wrote:
>>
>> I've spent the last sever
> I owe you a bottle of vodka or something then since I'm still changing them
> every couple of day :-) I've got a new one I want to discuss on list
> tonight that I'll send out after work.
Haha. Actually, I'd welcome the opportunity to discuss it further.
Better to get it right before we build
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Marvin Addison wrote:
> I've spent the last several days studying the 3.5 API and it confirms
> some concerns I've had about scope of change. Everything is changing:
>
I owe you a bottle of vodka or something then since I'm still changing them
every couple of day
I've spent the last several days studying the 3.5 API and it confirms
some concerns I've had about scope of change. Everything is changing:
- Terminology
- Package layouts
- Core component interfaces
I think when I initially supported the current roadmap,
https://wiki.jasig.org/pages/viewpage
11 matches
Mail list logo
