Thanks Scott. The class error is gone with your advice.
I get the message "The credentials you provided are not supported by CAS" what
am i not doing right...
--- On Thu, 2/11/10, Scott Battaglia wrote:
From: Scott Battaglia
Subject: Re: [cas-user] CAS Active Directory LDAP Support
To: cas
You can try adding the method to the action-state, i.e.
Not sure if that will do what you want.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Andy Cowling <
andy.cowl...@interactivedata.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have two autheorization handlers, each uses a disinct LDAP backend. IP
> ranges are used to det
Please re-read that LDAP page. There are a few points on it where it says
after 3.3.2 you need to use the LdapContextSource included with Spring LDAP.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Maina Watare wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
> I am using CAS 3.3.5.
>
> --- On *Thu, 2/11/10, Scott Battaglia
I think Eric made an update to the page. Not sure if that will help or not.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Jeff Chapin wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I believe that log line came from this bean:
> class="org.jasig.cas.web.flow.PasswordWarningCheckAction">
>
Thanks for your reply.
I am using CAS 3.3.5.
--- On Thu, 2/11/10, Scott Battaglia wrote:
From: Scott Battaglia
Subject: Re: [cas-user] CAS Active Directory LDAP Support
To: cas-user@lists.jasig.org
Date: Thursday, February 11, 2010, 8:51 AM
You don't mention which CAS you're using. If you'
Hi,
The error message you are receiving basically indicates that more than
4096(CAS_MAX_RESPONSE_SIZE) bytes of response data are returned when
mod_auth_cas hits the service validate URL. Can you manually create a
ticket and hit that URL using something like curl or wget to see how
much data comes
Hi,
I have a working CAS server that is accesible via HTTPS (443) with Apache
(2.2.9-10+lenny) + mod-jk (1.2.18-3etch2)+ Jboss 4.2.3 and via HTTPS to the
same Jboss in a Debian etch box.
I have compiled and configured mod_auth_cas in a diferrent machine, RHEL.
My mod_auth_cas configur
Here you are my working (W2003 - AD) deployerConfigContext.xml:
-
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xmlns:p="http://www.springframework.org/schema/p";
xsi:schemaLocation
You don't mention which CAS you're using. If you're using the most recent
version of CAS check that LDAP page for the alternative to
AuthenticatedLdapContextSource
-Scott Battaglia
PGP Public Key Id: 0x383733AA
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottbattaglia
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:43
Hi
I have two autheorization handlers, each uses a disinct LDAP backend. IP
ranges are used to determine which handler gets called.
To distinguish what's going on in login-webflow.xml I use distinct state
names: bindAndValidatePeopleLdap & bindAndValidateActiveDirectoryLdap
They appear for
And there I was trying to figure out why exactly CAS authentication via
SPNEGO was working more or less fine in Firefox and not so well in IE8
... and I hadn't seen the recent changes to the wiki yet. I just figured
my configuration was (partially) wrong.
Has anyone ever configured CAS to use S
Your Spring library(s) do not contain the class noted in the logs. The
error is thrown because the class needed is not found on your Classpath.
David
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Maina Watare wrote:
>Hi All,
>
> I am a newbie on CAS.
>
> I want to get CAS to authenticate against Acti
Hi All,I am a newbie on CAS.I want to get CAS to authenticate against Active
Directory username/password
I have been following the article on
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/CASUM/LDAP with little success.My Setup is
1. Tomcat 6.02. apache-maven-2.2.13. Windows Xp4. AD Ms Win 2008Currently i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I believe that log line came from this bean:
This was documented in the link below. Am I off base? I am still
learning how this setup works and feeling my way around.
Jeff
Scott Battaglia wrote:
> I don't know much about it but there's no reason
I'm not Dean, but there were prior emails on the cas-user or cas-dev list
that a recent patch from Microsoft broke SPNEGO with existing JVMs. JDK 1.7
was already compatible. I thought they were going to backport the change to
the latest 1.6 JVMs. I'm not sure if they did yet.
Dean could be tal
> Is the underlying cause of the alleged incompatibility known?
> Perhaps the author of that CASUM page can offer some insight here?
Care to jump in here, Dean?
M
--
You are currently subscribed to cas-user@lists.jasig.org as:
arch...@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, change settings or access
Is the underlying cause of the alleged incompatibility known?
Perhaps the author of that CASUM page can offer some insight here?
Marvin Addison wrote:
According to the CASUM SPNEGO page JDK 1.7 is required for SPNEGO to support
IE8. JDK 1.7 is not yet released.
I believe we should verify
> According to the CASUM SPNEGO page JDK 1.7 is required for SPNEGO to support
> IE8. JDK 1.7 is not yet released.
I believe we should verify that claim with an authoritative reference
from either Sun or Microsoft.
> IE8 has a "compatibility view", which I presume is used for
> supporting old IE
According to the CASUM SPNEGO page JDK 1.7 is required for SPNEGO to
support IE8. JDK 1.7 is not yet released.
Ergo, CAS currently has no single sign-on support with IE8
However, IE8 has a "compatibility view", which I presume is used for
supporting old IE javascript hacks. But can this "compa
19 matches
Mail list logo
