Hi Jason and others,
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Jason Manley wrote:
> > I am using baud rate of 115200. I tried what you suggested and I still
> not see anything on any of the 4 ports. I have tried with both the Roach2
> boards that we have, and it is the same behavior.
> We use minicom to
Hi,
I am willing to try to build my own uImage to resolve this, but I'm having
trouble figuring out what's needed. I looked through these repos:
roach2_nfs_uboot: seems to just be binaries
uboot_devel: This is the bootloader so should be a step before the uImage
is used
linux: This would seem logi
To answer my own question, it appears the uImage-nousb is also setup for
tcpborphserver3.
Is there a uImage that has USB disabled and works with tcpborphserver2? We
really need this...
Thanks,
Glenn
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:45 AM, G Jones wrote:
> Hi,
> In light of the possible issues we're h
Thanks, Marc!
On Dec 7, 2012, at 12:03 AM, Marc Welz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:13 PM, David MacMahon
> wrote:
>>
>> This will be helpful! Is there still a distinction or are the two formerly
>> different levels now considered one and the same? If they are still
>> distinct, can you
Hi,
In light of the possible issues we're having with tcpborphserver3, we're
trying to revert to tcpborphserver2. To do so, we tried the uImage-r2borph2
but it is freezing at boot at
ppc-soc-ohci ppc-soc-ohci.0: USB Host Controller
ppc-soc-ohci ppc-soc-ohci.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus
Hi all,
FWIW, I use these snapshots extensively on ROACH2 and have not had any
issues. However I'm still compiling using 11.x and still running
tcpborphserver2.
Best,
Rurik
On 12/7/2012 2:41 AM, Henno Kriel wrote:
Hi Dave
I think Andrews point 3 is relevant.
We have picked up on transient
Hi,
I seem to be running into this same problem. Will tcpborphserver2 run
on the same linux kernel or do I need to change to a borph specific
kernel?
Thanks,
Glenn
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Henno Kriel wrote:
> Hi Dave
>
> I think Andrews point 3 is relevant.
>
> We have picked up on transi
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:13 PM, David MacMahon
wrote:
>
> This will be helpful! Is there still a distinction or are the two formerly
> different levels now considered one and the same? If they are still
> distinct, can you please add an indication of which commands are KATCP and
> which are t
8 matches
Mail list logo