Thanks a lot Andrew!
We are using pfb_fir_real. So that is not a problem. I will try the new FFT
block very soon.
Thanks,
Nimish
On Sep 26, 2013, at 5:53 PM, Andrew Martens wrote:
Hi Dale
Just pushed my update to ska-sa repo on github. Replacement script
(doubles2unsigned.m) seems to be wor
Hi Dale
Just pushed my update to ska-sa repo on github. Replacement script
(doubles2unsigned.m) seems to be working (for basic simulations,
currently running more in-depth tests).
Calls to fi() have been removed from the FFT family as far as I can
tell, there are some still lurking in the ne
What about just checking out an older version of the libraries pre-'fi'?
On Sep 26, 2013 2:32 PM, "Nimish Sane" wrote:
> Yes, that is what I am trying right now (old netlist). Jack's FP license
> had reached its limit. So that did work anyways.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nimish
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at
Yes, that is what I am trying right now (old netlist). Jack's FP license
had reached its limit. So that did work anyways.
Thanks,
Nimish
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:58 PM, David MacMahon
wrote:
> Hi, Nimish,
>
> If you have a netlist you are happy with then just use that one. There is
> no need
Hi, Wes,
You could probably coax the current 10 GbE block to do multicast. Since the 10
GbE block assumes that all locally connected devices (i.e. on the same subnet)
have the same the first 24 bits of the IP address as the core's own IP address.
So you could choose a block of 256 consecutive
Hi, Nimish,
If you have a netlist you are happy with then just use that one. There is no
need to regenerate a new netlist unless you want a bugfix or a change in
latencies (e.g. to improve timing).
Dave
On Sep 26, 2013, at 8:32 AM, Nimish Sane wrote:
> Thanks Jack! I was thinking of using th
If you send the parameters to me I'll give it a go
On 26 Sep 2013 16:32, "Nimish Sane" wrote:
> Thanks Jack! I was thinking of using the black box which was generated
> using earlier toolflow and library, but this may be better. If someone with
> a license is willing to do this, please let me
Thanks Jack! I was thinking of using the black box which was generated
using earlier toolflow and library, but this may be better. If someone with
a license is willing to do this, please let me know. I will be happy to
share the mask parameter configuration.
The most annoying part of this is that
If you're really desperate, presumably someone on this list with a license
can precompile the fft block for you, which you could then black box? Or
generate the block, disable the init script, and send it to you?
Not necessarily suggesting that this is a better strategy than just
reverting your li
Hi Andrew,
We are desperate to complete a design by this week in order to support our
software development team over the weekend, but we are stuck right now due
to this issue. If you do manage to find a work-around and can provide a
block update, please let us know.
Many Thanks,
Dale
On Thu, S
Hi Dave
I use fi to convert coefficients to be stored from parallel matlab
double precision format into single unsigned words that will accurately
be converted back by slicing and using convert blocks. I think it is
possible to create the same functionality, I will have a quick try.
Cheers
A
11 matches
Mail list logo
