Eric Evans wrote:
Actually, I think it would be great to have it in both places, the
problem stems from each being updated independently (and yes, one of
them will almost certainly suffer from lack of updates).
I don't suppose something like Doxygen could be made to work with xml
I believe it
Dropping -dev (and hoping it sticks)...
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 10:12 -0800, kevin wrote:
> it will be great to have it in just one place. if it is in two places it is
> going to be hard to figure out which is latest and correct.
Actually, I think it would be great to have it in both places, the
pr
it will be great to have it in just one place. if it is in two places it is
going to be hard to figure out which is latest and correct.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:30 AM, TuxRacer69 wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> That's me. I understand that it can be painful to update.
>
> However I would say that a
Hi Jonathan,
That's me. I understand that it can be painful to update.
However I would say that a project of the size and popularity of
Cassandra deserves a dedicated configuration documentation. Also the
Wiki format allows you to make links to other pages which obviously
becomes non-clickabl
Hi,
Someone has been industriously improving the documentation of the
config file settings on the wiki. I'd rather move that into the
config file itself though rather than have it get out of date when we
update things. (E.g. moving from 0.4 to 0.5 RSN.)
I'd appreciate it if you could submit a p
