Re: [castor-dev] [JDO] - Are explicit object relationships supported in Castor OQL?

2004-05-06 Thread Jon Wilmoth
It turns out it was a browser caching issue with rendering the query results. The change to mapping did work. Now that I have the relationships working it brings up a question related to performance and lazy load, which I'll start in a new email to make topical searches easier. --- Bruce Snyder

Re: [castor-dev] [JDO] - Are explicit object relationships supported in Castor OQL?

2004-05-05 Thread Bruce Snyder
Jon Wilmoth wrote: That makes complete sense! What doesn't is why, after changing the parent's sql mapping to the FK column in the child table, why I still get the same org.exolab.castor.jdo.DataObjectAccessException: Type conversion error: could not set value of FieldMolder of Product.setproduct

Re: [castor-dev] [JDO] - Are explicit object relationships supported in Castor OQL?

2004-05-05 Thread Jon Wilmoth
<<< No Message Collected >>>

Re: [castor-dev] [JDO] - Are explicit object relationships supported in Castor OQL?

2004-05-05 Thread Werner Guttmann
<<< No Message Collected >>>

Re: [castor-dev] [JDO] - Are explicit object relationships supported in Castor OQL?

2004-05-04 Thread Jon Wilmoth
<<< No Message Collected >>>

Re: [castor-dev] [JDO] - Are explicit object relationships supported in Castor OQL?

2004-05-04 Thread Bruce Snyder
<<< No Message Collected >>>

[castor-dev] [JDO] - Are explicit object relationships supported in Castor OQL?

2004-05-04 Thread Jon Wilmoth
<<< No Message Collected >>>