Re: [castor-dev] possible bug? (was simple types not generated)

2003-03-28 Thread Keith Visco
Hi Duncan, I committed a patch to the CVS. Thanks, --Keith Keith Visco wrote: > > Hi Duncan, > > I'll double-check your patch against the CVS version (line numbers will > be different), but it seems like an appropriate fix. The one thing your > patch won't handle is if there is no prefix, b

Re: [castor-dev] possible bug? (was simple types not generated)

2003-03-24 Thread Duncan Hoyle
I was going to send the reply below in response to problems I was having, but I've since tracked down the cause of the problem - a possible bug and a solution. After much debugging I found that UnmarshallerHandler.startElement was treating the location element as a container element whilst no

Re: [castor-dev] Possible bug at parameterized type converter date -> char

2003-02-10 Thread Ralf Joachim
I also got the same problem with 0.9.4.2. Can anybody help me where to start to fix the bug? Regards Ralf - Original Message - From: "Ralf Joachim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 7:15 PM Subject: [castor-dev] Possibl

[castor-dev] Possible bug in TransactionContext.markUpdate, causing LockNotGrantedException: persist.writeLockTimeout

2002-10-07 Thread Michael Snebang
Title: Possible bug in TransactionContext.markUpdate, causing LockNotGrantedException: persist.writeLockTimeout We have one thread that reads objects from the database ( with read-only access) We have another thread that updates the objects ( with shared access ) Sometimes we get the foll

[castor-dev] possible bug in xml mapping include

2002-07-04 Thread Zsolt Kovacs
All, The attached zip file contains an example of the problem. It was develpoed using the cvs version in the directory of castor\src\examples\xml (ie. compiles with standard 'build examples'). Here is the short description of the classes. MemberHashtable is a Map which maintains a collection of

Re: [castor-dev] possible bug in XMLInstance2SchemaHandler

2002-06-12 Thread Keith Visco
Hi Zsolt, I checked this fix into CVS. Thanks, --Keith Zsolt Kovacs wrote: > > Hello, > > I have been testing the XML schema generation class of castor ( > org.exolab.castor.xml.schema.util.XMLInstance2SchemaHandler ) and I think > I have found a minor bug when it guesses the type of an si

Re: [castor-dev] possible bug in code generation?

2002-06-12 Thread Barnaby Morris
Thank you very much! Sorry for the newbie question. >From: Keith Visco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [castor-dev] possible bug in code generation? >Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 13:28:27 -0500 > > >You'll need t

Re: [castor-dev] possible bug in code generation?

2002-06-12 Thread Keith Visco
t;From: "Arnaud Blandin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: [castor-dev] possible bug in code generation? > >Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 08:08:31 +0200 > > > >Hi Barnaby, > > > >You are

Re: [castor-dev] possible bug in code generation?

2002-06-12 Thread Barnaby Morris
>From: "Arnaud Blandin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [castor-dev] possible bug in code generation? >Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 08:08:31 +0200 > >Hi Barnaby, > >You are getting the expected output. &

Re: [castor-dev] possible bug in XMLInstance2SchemaHandler

2002-06-10 Thread Keith Visco
Hi Zsolt, Thanks for the patch, I'll get it checked in ASAP. --Keith Zsolt Kovacs wrote: > > Hello, > > I have been testing the XML schema generation class of castor ( > org.exolab.castor.xml.schema.util.XMLInstance2SchemaHandler ) and I think > I have found a minor bug when it guesses the t

[castor-dev] possible bug in XMLInstance2SchemaHandler

2002-06-10 Thread Zsolt Kovacs
Hello, I have been testing the XML schema generation class of castor ( org.exolab.castor.xml.schema.util.XMLInstance2SchemaHandler ) and I think I have found a minor bug when it guesses the type of an simple element which actually has no value, ie. it looks like this . Due to this missing data th

[castor-dev] Possible Bug instantiating Date type

2001-11-04 Thread Chris Longfield
Title: Message I have a schema which defines and element of type Date as a child of another type which can occur an unlimited number of times:       When the source is generated, the accessor instantiates the return array without package qualifiers:   // public

Re: [castor-dev] possible bug

2001-10-08 Thread Keith Chew
Ignore this mail. I figured it out. I have to manually set the reference. Doh. Keith C -Original Message- From: Keith Chew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 9 October 2001 12:28 p.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [castor-dev] possible bug Hi All Very simple question. I

[castor-dev] possible bug

2001-10-08 Thread Keith Chew
Hi All Very simple question. I have ObjectA with has many ObjectBs. When I create ObjectA, it writes everything correctly to the DB. When I remove, it removes form both tables correctly too. However, when I: (1) create ObjectA (2) restart the application (3) delete ObjectA Now, the cache is emp

[castor-dev] Possible bug

2001-10-04 Thread Krishnan N
hi, was trying out Castor JDO (0.9.3) with oracle database. I have a column in a table which has datatype set to int. If i try to give the datatype as integer (as is given in the example program) in my mapping file for sql, i get an exception namely Exception in thread "main" java.lang.Abs

[castor-dev] Possible bug

2001-09-28 Thread Al Byers
I have traced my problem down to a level where I am not sure what is going on, but it seems to be worth reporting just in case it is really a bug. I have a mapping file in which all the field elements had child "sql" elements, but then some of those columns were removed from the database. I left t

Re: [castor-dev] Possible bug in Castor 0.93 classloader (when used in Tomcat 3.2.1 app)

2001-08-17 Thread Patrick van Kann
Werner, Thanks, that's probably the problem then. I am using Tomcat 3.2.1. I apologise for impugning Castor's class loader! I did indicate this in the subject field of the email, but I can see that the subject was way too long! I would like to add that this is a very erudite and helpful list.

Re: [castor-dev] Possible bug in Castor 0.93 classloader (when used in Tomcat 3.2.1 app)

2001-08-16 Thread Werner Guttmann
Patrick, Your email does not indicate which version of Tomcat you are using, hence I am assuming that you are using Tomcat 3.2.x. Now, as far as I know the issue below is a result of a "faulty" classloader implementation in Tomcat 3.2.x and earlier. I've seen emails indicating that with Tomcat

Re: [castor-dev] Possible bug(?) in many-many relation - setting collection with too many objects

2001-07-25 Thread Thomas Yip
Hi Tim, I believe the bug you found was fixed two weeks or more ago, isn't it? Thomas -Original Message- >From: Tim Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 6:37 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [castor-dev] Possible bug(?) in many-many r