[Catalyst] setup_home bug (with fix): wrong detection of home directory

Hello. I put the service script into APP_HOME/script/service/online_users.plx In the script: use FindBin; use lib $FindBin::Bin/../../lib; use MyApp; print MyApp-path_to('/'); # prints APP_HOME/script/service/ Fix for Catalyst::Utils (sub Catalyst::Utils::home): 174,176c174,177

Re: [Catalyst] get the path to the home

MyApp-path_to() 2007/9/28, Octavian Rasnita [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I have a I18N module in my Catalyst application and I want to get the path to the home directory of the application. Is it possible to get it without hard codding it in that module? The module is: package

Re: [Catalyst] log4perl autoflush (buffering log output?)

I use this hack to disable buffering for MyApp code (not for Catalyst core). package MyApp; __PACKAGE__-log( MyApp::Log-new ); package MyApp::Log; use strict; use base 'Catalyst::Log'; sub _log { my $self = shift; $self-SUPER::_log(@_); $self-_flush if scalar(caller(1)) =~

Re: [Catalyst] Re: Running MyAppB under MyAppA (only for developers)

If someone need te attach one application to another i will send the plugin's code (it works only with several restriction to the application being attached). ___ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo:

Re: [Catalyst] Re: Running MyAppB under MyAppA (only for developers)

I solved this problem recently. But only for my case. To enable uniadm for your project you just need to do use Catalyst qw/Uniadm/; and possibly. __PACKAGE__-config-{uniadm} = { prefix = 'admin', }; and it will be available at yoursite/admin The plugin attaches all actions (changing

[Catalyst] Re: Running MyAppB under MyAppA (only for developers)

Thanks for a lot of usefull answers :) ___ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

[Catalyst] Running MyAppB under MyAppA (only for developers)

I need to plug in application B in A, so it could extend A's actions under some namespace. I understand this is not so simple, but i have no other way. I write a dynamic admin interface (Uniadm) that will be plugged in to various projects. It will extend functionallity of a project it was

[Catalyst] YAML Config

Hi. I would like to use references to variables that have been defined in my yaml config. Something like this: var_dir: var __path_to(var)__ log_dir: log *var/log log_file: *log/file.txt This is a feature of YAML 1.0. But it seems that only *pure* aliases (*var) work only in YAML::Syck

Re: [Catalyst] do I need to load Apache::DBI?

Under mod_perl all calls to DBI are proxied to Apache::DBI 2007/7/24, Cédric Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, I have failed to understand something. If I run my Catalyst application under mod_perl, will it automatically use persistent database connections, or do I have to explicitely tell

Re: [Catalyst] YAML Config

)__ ? Too many copy-pasting. And too many to change when var_dir changes. 2007/7/24, Ash Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Oleg Pronin wrote: Hi. I would like to use references to variables that have been defined in my yaml config. Something like this: var_dir: var __path_to(var)__ log_dir: log

Re: [Catalyst] YAML Config

I don't even know what those do. Why do you want them? anchors are used to define an anchor on variable. *aliases are used to insert previously defined anchor's value. For example, root_dir: root /very/long/path/to/root/dir root_dir2: *root print MyApp-config-{root_dir2}; #

Re: [Catalyst] YAML Config

/subdir etc I didn't find it in specification. YAML::XS is the most advanced Yaml parser supporting Yaml 1.1, but it is not used by Catalyst. 2007/7/24, Ash Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Oleg Pronin wrote: I don't even know what those do. Why do you want them? anchors are used to define

Re: [Catalyst] YAML Config

Can you give a specific reference to the place in the YAML spec that says this is allowed? I can only find statements about aliases to nodes (i.e. what you call pure aliases). I can't see any provision for substituting values and then adding to them. So the modules are simply implementing the

Re: [Catalyst] IDE for use with Catalyst

:) 2007/7/1, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 06:50:36PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote: OptiPerl does. The coolest IDE for perl i ever seen http://xarka.com Wake me up when they release a version for an OS worth doing dev work on. -- Matt S Trout Need help

Re: [Catalyst] IDE for use with Catalyst

OptiPerl does. The coolest IDE for perl i ever seen http://xarka.com 2007/7/1, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 04:43:57PM -0500, Tom Printy wrote: Hi There, I am taking a this week off of work and would really like to build an application with catalyst. Does

[Catalyst] How to access current MyApp instance ?

Hi. I want to call -uri_for from my DBIC sources, but it is object method, so MyApp-uri_for doesn't work. How do I access current catalyst object ($c)? ___ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst

Re: [Catalyst] reusable view components

You can use this technique for simple forwarding to private action and including its result template (to use with template-toolkit): I defined a dynamic filter: iforward = [ sub { my ($context, $c, $args) = @_; return sub { my

Re: [Catalyst] reusable view components

If you want to include your components with dispatching (full request cycle), please see plugin Subrequest. But with this plugin you will lose perfomance because instead of 1 request you will get many. (possibly 'auto' actions will be called several times). 2007/5/17, John Goulah [EMAIL

[Catalyst] $c-uri_for with proxy (heavy loaded projects).

Greetings. Imagine: Variant #1 - simple BROWSER http://site.com - Apache(80). uri_for is http://site.com Variant #2 - simple proxing BROWSER http://site.com - nginx/oops (80) - Apache(81). uri_for is http://site.com:81 ! Variant #3 - complex proxing BROWSER http://site.com - nginx (80) -

Re: [Catalyst] $c-uri_for with proxy (heavy loaded projects).

Thanks a lot ! 2007/5/16, Brian Cassidy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Oleg Pronin wrote: Does anyone can advice a good solution ? Read: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Runtime/lib/Catalyst.pm#PROXY_SUPPORT -Brian ___ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org

Re: [Catalyst] How to make MyApp::B a part of MyApp::A ?

Is this feature planned for the next release ? ___ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/ Dev site:

Re: [Catalyst] How to make MyApp::B a part of MyApp::A ?

Please tell me how could i implement that without making the interface a complete app ? 2007/5/8, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 06:58:16PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote: I can test the part related to the subject of this thread with great pleasure. I'm currently making

Re: [Catalyst] How to make MyApp::B a part of MyApp::A ?

This interface is accessible under /folder/. It has its own templates, static content, DBIC sources and controllers. What excatly do i need to specify? So please share your ideas :) 2007/5/8, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 06:58:16PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote: I can

Re: [Catalyst] How to make MyApp::B a part of MyApp::A ?

I think it would be better if it does not. Because AppA don't know and don't want to know the templates and models of AppB. They communicate through controllers only. 2007/5/8, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:20:33PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote: This interface

Re: [Catalyst] How to make MyApp::B a part of MyApp::A ?

enough with catalyst's internals to advice somethin. 2007/5/8, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:13:29PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote: I think it would be better if it does not. Because AppA don't know and don't want to know the templates and models of AppB

Re: [Catalyst] How to make MyApp::B a part of MyApp::A ?

). That's because i need this feature. 2007/5/7, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 06:27:58PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote: Do you know when will be the next release? Depends on whether you help us test the code to make sure it's fit for release :) -- Matt S Trout Need

Re: [Catalyst] How to make MyApp::B a part of MyApp::A ?

to use separate $c objects, variable namespaces e.t.c. each $c can just jump to another $c if foreign url has been detected. 2007/5/7, Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 08:02:04PM +0400, Oleg Pronin wrote: You didn't understand what i meant. MyApp::A is not a class. It's

[Catalyst] How to make MyApp::B a part of MyApp::A ?

Greetings! I want to make MyApp::B a part of MyApp::A under namespace for example /folder/ Both B and A are normal catalyst applications. (both do '__PACKAGE__-setup()' and etc. and therefore cannot work together). How to do this with minimal changes to application A (for example, using B as

Re: [Catalyst] MySQL server has gone away

That /is/ what we are talking about - unless MySQL cannot tell you that the database connection has evaporated while in transaction context. $dbh can tell you. while in transaction $dbh-{AutoCommit} is off. ___ List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org

Re: [Catalyst] MySQL server has gone away

Dragonstaff Limited http://www.dragonstaff.com Oleg Pronin wrote: One can say that it is a very rare situation. I can tell you that in production environment (about 1.000.000 hits per day) it happens every day several times. Some users just see an error, some lost

Re: [Catalyst] MySQL server has gone away

If you don't need transaction you don't use it. This is not we talking about. To use transaction or not in every case is a high-level logic decision 2007/4/27, Jeff Chimene [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Oleg Pronin wrote: One can say that it is a very rare situation. I can tell you that in production

Re: [Catalyst] MySQL server has gone away

Hi all! Unfortunately, Catalyst::Model::DBI and similar modules are too simple to avoid some more rare situations. For example, what if $dbh-prepare result is fine but before you call $dbh-execute the database will be gone away? I'm creating a DBI wrapper (it will be called DBIx::Safe) that

Re: [Catalyst] MySQL server has gone away

]: Oleg Pronin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/26/2007 01:29:23 PM: Hi all! Unfortunately, Catalyst::Model::DBI and similar modules are too simple to avoid some more rare situations. For example, what if $dbh-prepare result is fine but before you call $dbh-execute the database will be gone away

Re: [Catalyst] MySQL server has gone away

One can say that it is a very rare situation. I can tell you that in production environment (about 1.000.000 hits per day) it happens every day several times. Some users just see an error, some lost their data. This is just not always visible to you. 2007/4/27, Oleg Pronin [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Catalyst] MySQL server has gone away

(...); # anyway ok $sth-execute(...); #anyway ok It will block you program until it reconnects and re-execute your query. (or number of retries reached). Of course in case of any non-connection error you will give an error :) 2007/4/27, Oleg Pronin [EMAIL PROTECTED]: No. SQL query may produce

Re: [Catalyst] How to make chained actions nice?

) { ... } # Responds to /object/[OBJ_ID]/property/[PROP_ID]/edit sub edit : Chained('property') Args(0) { ... } Hope that helps! Danny Warren Oleg Pronin wrote: Greetings. I've got some kind of problem using chained actions. There are some objects. Each object has a number of properties. And this is how

[Catalyst] How to make chained actions nice?

Greetings. I've got some kind of problem using chained actions. There are some objects. Each object has a number of properties. And this is how i want it to be: URL for a list of objects is /object/list URL for editing object is /object/OBJ_ID/edit (through chained action) URL for list of

Re: [Catalyst] Componentised actions.

These actions (like /schema/list) is processed by default handler in root controller so there are no such actions. See previous post 2007/3/30, Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:46:48AM -0300, Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote: On 3/29/07, Oleg Pronin [EMAIL

Re: [Catalyst] Componentised actions.

auto actions etc. The code is executed twice. I need to execute only action i want but i need catalyst to look for it with all dispatch rules. 2007/3/30, Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 3/29/07, Oleg Pronin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I cannot forward to the list actions

[Catalyst] Componentised actions.

Greetings! I'm developing a website based on catalyst and want it to be moduled and componentised the way like this: site.com/object1/list displays objects 1 in empty design. site.com/object2/list displays objects 2 in empty design. site.com/nicepage displays a page in website design