to run an individual test :
perl -Ilib t/some_test_module.t
On 12/5/06, Dave Howorth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> Yesterday I have installed Catalyst and Task::Catalyst under Linux, using
> the CPAN shell.
> The process gave many errors, but they disappeared beeing rep
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> Yesterday I have installed Catalyst and Task::Catalyst under Linux, using
> the CPAN shell.
> The process gave many errors, but they disappeared beeing replaced by the
> new lines printed, so I don't know how to find them.
> I have tried "install Catalyst" again, thinking
> Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 12/4/06, Hermida, Leandro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think it is possible to achieve both flexibilty and achieveability
>> in the same framework. Catalyst can be "a pre-packaged framework
that
>> just works" with a l
Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
> On 12/4/06, Octavian Rasnita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yes of course, but if thinking this way, PHP could be considered not very
>> successfully, because it is not an extraordinary language, however, it is
>> used in much more web sites than perl, and so
On 12/4/06, Hermida, Leandro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it is possible to achieve both flexibilty and achieveability in
the same framework. Catalyst can be "a pre-packaged framework that just
works" with a low cost of entry while still providing flexbility to
advanced users needing more
On 12/4/06, Octavian Rasnita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes of course, but if thinking this way, PHP could be considered not very
successfully, because it is not an extraordinary language, however, it is
used in much more web sites than perl, and some big sites like Yahoo also
use it.
PHP is ve
"Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/04/2006
07:52:40 AM:
> On 12/4/06, Octavian Rasnita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And I said that there is no de facto standard, because there isn't one
> > generally accepted.
>
> There's a defacto standard for writing Cataly
> And those other languages probably also have choices
> between templating systems or ORMs. The thing that
> actually makes Rails so successful is the fact that
> it has everything already sorted out. You can't really
> learn Rails without using ActiveRecord for instance.
>
> If the newbie g
This whole conversation boils down to what are the aims of Catalyst as
an open source project. In order to gain popularity there should be
less focus on flexibility and more focus on "achievability". However,
in most serious developments this won't help much, it'd just be a lot
of work and the onl
"In order to gain popularity there should be
less focus on flexibility and more focus on "achievability". However,
in most serious developments this won't help much, it'd just be a lot
of work and the only benefits might be a dozen new users - there would
be no real benefits for the existing users
On 12/4/06, Octavian Rasnita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And I said that there is no de facto standard, because there isn't one
generally accepted.
There's a defacto standard for writing Catalyst applications.
The Catalyst users have an opinion, the CGI::App might have another one, the
Mason u
> This immediately brought to mind what I think is wrong (or I guess some
> people would say is right) with CPAN in regards to our discussion here.
> We want to make the Perl community bigger and better and that means we
> need to bring programmers to Perl, right? Well CPAN is one of the great
>
Honestly, your tackling this problem from a very ackward POV. When I
had no clue about Catalyst I sure had difficulties and so on but they
were primarily TT and DBIC issues. Catalyst itself always seemed
pretty intuitive to me. There's something in your questioning that
sets you appart from the r
On 12/2/06, Octavian Rasnita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have seen that your example modifies the root controller, so this convince
me that this is not a tutorial for beginners.
The beginners should start learning to use Catalyst, without SVN, with its
default ways of doing things, without other
From: Kieren Diment
> I wrote the svn section to remind myself of the various stuff that you have
to do to when setting up a new project - mainly because I do lots of small
coding projects and can never remember what to do.
> As far as the root controller goes, that's almost always going
On 03/12/06, Octavian Rasnita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
*From:* Kieren Diment <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Any chance you could comment on:
http://www.catalystframework.org/calendar/2006/1
and suggest further improvements?
Well, I can't suggest for improvements, because that tutorial is not for
On Saturday 02 December 2006 13:34, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> If Catalyst requires knowing how to use other modules it is all right,
> but in that case the Catalyst manual should specify that very clearly. It
> should say something like:
> "If you want to use Catalyst, you should first know DBI
From: Kieren Diment
> Any chance you could comment on:
http://www.catalystframework.org/calendar/2006/1
and suggest further improvements?
Well, I can't suggest for improvements, because that tutorial is not for a
beginner and that's where I am. :-)
It is a fine tutorial for someone
From: vb
> don't know anything?
> I think the Catalyst *and* perl is not for beginners (see PHP for those) -
or redefine:
> beginner:: a person with good background, and with good background in
programming
> (including a independent experience in creation of a onorable application)
19 matches
Mail list logo
