On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:36:41PM -0700, Maurice Aubrey wrote:
> >Separating out the interrogation of the context and retrieval of data into
> >the ACCEPT_CONTEXT is how you avoid loose coupling - and it also then means
> >you know you have -one- method that requires a mocked $c to test rather
> >
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:12:10PM -0700, mla wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 01:04:02PM -0700, mla wrote:
Other than the fact you don't like the style, why is it bad?
You don't like singletons?
I'm not fond of any magic global if I can possibly avoid it
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:12:10PM -0700, mla wrote:
> Matt S Trout wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 01:04:02PM -0700, mla wrote:
> >>Other than the fact you don't like the style, why is it bad?
> >>You don't like singletons?
> >
> >I'm not fond of any magic global if I can possibly avoid it - I f
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 01:04:02PM -0700, mla wrote:
Other than the fact you don't like the style, why is it bad?
You don't like singletons?
I'm not fond of any magic global if I can possibly avoid it - I find it
tends to encourage tight coupling of code and action at a dis
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Matt S Trout wrote:
I'm not fond of any magic global if I can possibly avoid it - I find it
tends to encourage tight coupling of code and action at a distance and
makes testing and debugging messy.
I agree. A singleton is basically a _very_ thin mask for a global.
I prefe
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 01:04:02PM -0700, mla wrote:
> Matt S Trout wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:55:16AM -0700, Jonathan Swartz wrote:
> >>mia wrote:
> >>>Matt S Trout wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 02:18:33PM -0700, mla wrote:
> >>>Assuming I'm not using threads, how would I hurt mys
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:55:16AM -0700, Jonathan Swartz wrote:
mia wrote:
Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 02:18:33PM -0700, mla wrote:
Assuming I'm not using threads, how would I hurt myself by
subclassing Catalyst and supplying a MyApp->context that returns
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:55:16AM -0700, Jonathan Swartz wrote:
> mia wrote:
> >Matt S Trout wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 02:18:33PM -0700, mla wrote:
> >>> Matt S Trout wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:29:12PM -0700, mla wrote:
> > Is it not possible to offer the current Cataly
mia wrote:
>Matt S Trout wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 02:18:33PM -0700, mla wrote:
>>> Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:29:12PM -0700, mla wrote:
> Is it not possible to offer the current Catalyst instance through
> a class method? Something analogous to Apache->req
