RE: [Catalyst] Hypothetical Site and Scalability Planning

2007-10-26 Thread Mesdaq, Ali
J, Amazing feedback this is great! I think memcached is great. I haven't had time to play with it yet but I have pretty much read everything and been prepped to play with it once I have a chance. I personally think that storing images in the DB is the best place to start because if other better

Re: [Catalyst] Hypothetical Site and Scalability Planning

2007-10-26 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, J. Shirley wrote: NFS gets a deserved wrap. It isn't anybody knocking it, but it is simply That's "rap", as in "rap sheet", people! ;) -dave /*=== VegGuide.Orgwww.BookIRead.com Your guide to all th

Re: [Catalyst] Hypothetical Site and Scalability Planning

2007-10-26 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, J. Shirley wrote: Another piece of advice: Don't look at requests per second as the idea of webserver scalability -- sure, you want to have efficient code, but that is just efficient code measurement; not scalability. Look at it this way: How many webservers do I need to ad

Re: [Catalyst] Hypothetical Site and Scalability Planning

2007-10-26 Thread J. Shirley
On 10/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > NFS gets a bad wrap, as long as you do sane planning and lay it out > properly NFS works very very well for servicing static files to the > webservers. Breaking out to S3 seems silly (Amazon is out to make money > with S3 and if yo

Re: [Catalyst] Hypothetical Site and Scalability Planning

2007-10-26 Thread Johan Lindstr
At 19:24 2007-10-26, Mesdaq, Ali wrote: Just wanted to start a thread about scalability planning and design. I was thinking we could take the approach of what peoples opinions, ideas, and best practices are for large scale sites and use a hypothetical site or a existing site as the model to pla

Re: [Catalyst] Fucking spam.

2007-10-26 Thread Matt S Trout
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 04:44:14AM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 01:04:54AM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote: > > Reported to nabble abuse. I'll be killing the post out the archives as > > well. Bollocks. He was subscribed as well. Nabble don't actually send from their address as s

Re: [Catalyst] Hypothetical Site and Scalability Planning

2007-10-26 Thread Wade . Stuart
"J. Shirley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/26/2007 02:30:43 PM: > On 10/26/07, Mesdaq, Ali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey All, > Just wanted to start a thread about scalability planning and design. > I was thinking we could take the approach of what peoples opinions, > ideas, and best practi

Re: [Catalyst] returning empty 200 response

2007-10-26 Thread Matt S Trout
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 12:18:16PM -0700, Devo Coran wrote: > hi > > This is probably a basic question but after playing > around for a few hours and going through the docs I > haven't been able to figure it out. Appreciate it if > maybe someone could point me in the right direction > for docs. >

Re: [Catalyst] Hypothetical Site and Scalability Planning

2007-10-26 Thread J. Shirley
On 10/26/07, Mesdaq, Ali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey All, > > Just wanted to start a thread about scalability planning and design. I was > thinking we could take the approach of what peoples opinions, ideas, and > best practices are for large scale sites and use a hypothetical site or a > e

Re: [Catalyst] returning empty 200 response

2007-10-26 Thread Jonathan Rockway
Devo Coran wrote: > but the problem is it keeps going to > /end > MyApp::View::TT->process > You probably want a different end action in this controller: sub end :Private { my ($self, $c) = @_; $c->detach($c->view('Static')); } RenderView (which I assume you are using for

[Catalyst] returning empty 200 response

2007-10-26 Thread Devo Coran
hi This is probably a basic question but after playing around for a few hours and going through the docs I haven't been able to figure it out. Appreciate it if maybe someone could point me in the right direction for docs. Basically I"m doing an ajax save from a text area, so all I care about is t

[Catalyst] Hypothetical Site and Scalability Planning

2007-10-26 Thread Mesdaq, Ali
Hey All, Just wanted to start a thread about scalability planning and design. I was thinking we could take the approach of what peoples opinions, ideas, and best practices are for large scale sites and use a hypothetical site or a existing site as the model to plan for. Not everything discussed ne

Re: [Catalyst] Fucking spam.

2007-10-26 Thread Matt S Trout
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 11:39:47AM +0200, Bernhard Graf wrote: > On Friday 26 October 2007 09:58, Jonathan Rockway wrote: > > Bernhard Graf wrote: > > > I already dumped this mail, but didn't it have a gmail.com > > > Return-Path? Gmail is one of the (fre)emailers that uses Domain-Key > > > / DKIM

Re: [Catalyst] Fucking spam from nabble

2007-10-26 Thread Matt S Trout
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 07:45:35AM -0500, Thomas L. Shinnick wrote: > Any chance from a guy named 'Rod'? Google for nabble and you'll see > other problems also. Nabble allows people to post through nabble > into maillists that nabble is subscribed to. The email came from nabble: > Received:

Re: [Catalyst] [OT] duplicate messages

2007-10-26 Thread Jonathan Rockway
Hi all. No need to put the list in both 'to' and 'cc'. One should suffice :) Regards, Jonathan Rockway signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listi

Re: [Catalyst] [OT] Firefox input type=image issues?

2007-10-26 Thread Christopher H. Laco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Christopher, > > I have run into this issue as well, every time it appeared to be > because one or more web developer extensions were loaded on the client and > were causing the issue. I have not tracked it down to which ones or the > settings that seem to cause

Re: [Catalyst] [OT] Firefox input type=image issues?

2007-10-26 Thread Wade . Stuart
Christopher, I have run into this issue as well, every time it appeared to be because one or more web developer extensions were loaded on the client and were causing the issue. I have not tracked it down to which ones or the settings that seem to cause it (greesemonky, firebug, etc), but

[Catalyst] [OT] Firefox input type=image issues?

2007-10-26 Thread Christopher H. Laco
I posted this to UP, and wondered if anyone has run across this issue during their Catalyst hacking sessions. There's a long standing bug/feature with Firefox with input type=image elements. When the user has images turned off, the image is 404ed or just not loaded...when it's clicked, no x/y coo

Re: [Catalyst] Fucking spam from nabble

2007-10-26 Thread Thomas L. Shinnick
At 10:44 PM 10/25/2007, Matt S Trout wrote: On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 01:04:54AM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote: > Reported to nabble abuse. I'll be killing the post out the archives as > well. Reply: "Thanks for reporting this. This is a persistent spammer and he had faked many accounts to post. We

Re: [Catalyst] Parley / http://dev.catalystframework.org/

2007-10-26 Thread Chisel Wright
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 09:16:06AM +0100, Ash Berlin wrote: > Done (by kennyg about 6 hours ago) Muchos gracias -- Chisel Wright e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w: http://www.herlpacker.co.uk/ Brownian motion: the motion of money from individuals' pockets to the Treasury coffers.

Re: [Catalyst] Fucking spam.

2007-10-26 Thread Jonathan Rockway
Bernhard Graf wrote: > [ ] you have already administrated a real mail server [ ] In the future, I am going to start my flames with a questionnaire for the recipient to fill out. [ x ] My mail server only exists in the Matrix Regards, Jonathan Rockway signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digi

Re: [Catalyst] Fucking spam.

2007-10-26 Thread Bernhard Graf
On Friday 26 October 2007 09:58, Jonathan Rockway wrote: > Bernhard Graf wrote: > > I already dumped this mail, but didn't it have a gmail.com > > Return-Path? Gmail is one of the (fre)emailers that uses Domain-Key > > / DKIM signatures. > > > > So any mail from g(oogle)mail.com (among others) with

Re: [Catalyst] Parley / http://dev.catalystframework.org/

2007-10-26 Thread Ash Berlin
Chisel Wright wrote: > I was just scanning through http://dev.catalystframework.org/ and > realised that (my project) Parley is listed under 'Examples'. > > I'm not sure how good an example the application is ... > > Would a kind soul with edit rights to this page please move Parley out > of exam

Re: [Catalyst] Fucking spam.

2007-10-26 Thread Jonathan Rockway
Bernhard Graf wrote: > I already dumped this mail, but didn't it have a gmail.com Return-Path? > Gmail is one of the (fre)emailers that uses Domain-Key / DKIM > signatures. > > So any mail from g(oogle)mail.com (among others) without a (valid) > DK(IM) key could be dismissed by the mail server if

Re: [Catalyst] Fucking spam.

2007-10-26 Thread Bernhard Graf
On Friday 26 October 2007 05:44, Matt S Trout wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 01:04:54AM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote: > > Reported to nabble abuse. I'll be killing the post out the archives > > as well. > > Reply: > > "Thanks for reporting this. This is a persistent spammer and he had > faked many a