On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Tomas Doran bobtf...@bobtfish.net wrote:
So, what would you recommend? Have a separate /user/$id/debug method that
does a separate step-by-step of the business logic? Scrap all that really
handy chaining of resultsets that works so well with Catalyst's
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 02:38:50PM -0700, Steve Kleiman wrote:
Here goes...hopefully a simple test case for the RunAfterRequest oddness.
The code below with the forward INSIDE 'run_after_request' subroutine throws
the error:
[error] Caught exception in engine Modification of non-creatable
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 04:18:46PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
I have a CRUD interface to an application. This is used for both the Web
and directly as an API.
The model uses DBIC which, as you know, allows chaining resultsets, which I
use to add additional constraints to the result set.
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Matt S Trout m...@shadowcat.co.uk wrote:
Am I correct in thinking that's built up in multiple -search calls?
Somewhat, yes.
... if you keep all the intermediate resultsets around in the stash or
wherever (or better still refactor to resultset methods and
Wow, Matt. That works like a charm. THANK YOU.
No pointing and laughing from this corner. Except at myself for not setting up
a proper email dispatching mechanism. One bridge at a time.
Again, my thanks for tracking that down.
Steve Kleiman
st...@prodhub.com
On May 2, 2010, at 12:49 PM,
