Re: [Catalyst] Dist::Zilla + Catalyst?

2010-04-28 Thread Matt S Trout
(dropping cc to rjbs because really, wtf) On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 04:03:30PM +, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > It's (at least for me) mainly about removing the duplicate work that > goes into release. The *only* thing that I do when releasing now, aside > from editing the code, is manually u

Re: [Catalyst] Dist::Zilla + Catalyst?

2010-04-28 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 15:29, Matt S Trout wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:20:05PM +, Ęvar Arnfjörš Bjarmason wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 14:30, Matt S Trout wrote: >> > In the case of Catalyst applications, the standard assumption that a >> > checkout >> > and a final dist look m

Re: [Catalyst] Dist::Zilla + Catalyst?

2010-04-28 Thread Matt S Trout
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:20:05PM +, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 14:30, Matt S Trout wrote: > > In the case of Catalyst applications, the standard assumption that a > > checkout > > and a final dist look much the same (as is normal for CPAN) is used quite > > sub

Re: [Catalyst] Dist::Zilla + Catalyst?

2010-04-28 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 14:30, Matt S Trout wrote: >> I'm sorry, I thought that the location of 'Home' was set based on the >> Makefile.PL. Reviewing the documentation, I see a dist.ini file can also >> serve for that purpose. > > However, one of the tenets of Dist::Zilla is that your base direc

Re: [Catalyst] Dist::Zilla + Catalyst?

2010-04-28 Thread Matt S Trout
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 06:03:15AM -0400, John SJ Anderson wrote: > > On Apr 25, 2010, at 12:10 , Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 15:39, John SJ Anderson > > wrote: > >> Is anybody using Dist::Zilla in combination with Catalyst? If so, are you > >> just not using i

Re: [Catalyst] Dist::Zilla + Catalyst?

2010-04-26 Thread John SJ Anderson
On Apr 25, 2010, at 12:10 , Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 15:39, John SJ Anderson wrote: >> Is anybody using Dist::Zilla in combination with Catalyst? If so, are you >> just not using it to generate your Makefile.PL or are you working around the >> issues that presen

Re: [Catalyst] Dist::Zilla + Catalyst?

2010-04-25 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 15:39, John SJ Anderson wrote: > Is anybody using Dist::Zilla in combination with Catalyst? If so, are you > just not using it to generate your Makefile.PL or are you working around the > issues that presents in some other way? I'm using it for a plugin I have (Catalyst:

[Catalyst] Dist::Zilla + Catalyst?

2010-04-25 Thread John SJ Anderson
Is anybody using Dist::Zilla in combination with Catalyst? If so, are you just not using it to generate your Makefile.PL or are you working around the issues that presents in some other way? thx, j. ___ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http