On Thursday 24 July 2008 04:38:30 Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 08:29:42AM -0500, Peter Karman wrote:
On 07/22/2008 10:37 PM, Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:27:13AM -0700, Bruce J Keeler wrote:
Also, somewhat apropos, I have a
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 05:29:38PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Thursday 24 July 2008 04:38:30 Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 08:29:42AM -0500, Peter Karman wrote:
On 07/22/2008 10:37 PM, Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:27:13AM -0700, Bruce J Keeler wrote:
On 07/22/2008 10:37 PM, Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:27:13AM -0700, Bruce J Keeler wrote:
Also, somewhat apropos, I have a
C::A::{Store,Credential}::ActiveDirectory that I based on the LDAP
stuff. The LDAP modules didn't work for me because they want to bind
Peter Karman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/23/2008 08:29:42 AM:
On 07/22/2008 10:37 PM, Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:27:13AM -0700, Bruce J Keeler wrote:
Also, somewhat apropos, I have a
C::A::{Store,Credential}::ActiveDirectory that I based on the LDAP
stuff. The
Peter Karman wrote:
On 07/22/2008 10:37 PM, Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:27:13AM -0700, Bruce J Keeler wrote:
Also, somewhat apropos, I have a
C::A::{Store,Credential}::ActiveDirectory that I based on the LDAP
stuff. The LDAP modules didn't work for me because they
Bruce J Keeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/23/2008 02:16:16 PM:
Peter Karman wrote:
On 07/22/2008 10:37 PM, Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:27:13AM -0700, Bruce J Keeler wrote:
Also, somewhat apropos, I have a
C::A::{Store,Credential}::ActiveDirectory that I based
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 08:29:42AM -0500, Peter Karman wrote:
On 07/22/2008 10:37 PM, Matt S Trout wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:27:13AM -0700, Bruce J Keeler wrote:
Also, somewhat apropos, I have a
C::A::{Store,Credential}::ActiveDirectory that I based on the LDAP
stuff. The
Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/21/2008 04:32:03 PM:
Maybe the search phase failed for the original poster?
I dunno, I was just saying it should probably support both approaches :)
Sorry Matt, my comment was directed twords the OP not you -- I just
piggybacked on your message.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:27:13AM -0700, Bruce J Keeler wrote:
Also, somewhat apropos, I have a
C::A::{Store,Credential}::ActiveDirectory that I based on the LDAP
stuff. The LDAP modules didn't work for me because they want to bind
anonymously and retrieve the crypted password, whereas
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:48:39AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt S Trout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/19/2008 07:10:28 PM:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:27:13AM -0700, Bruce J Keeler wrote:
Also, somewhat apropos, I have a
C::A::{Store,Credential}::ActiveDirectory that I based on
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:27:13AM -0700, Bruce J Keeler wrote:
Also, somewhat apropos, I have a
C::A::{Store,Credential}::ActiveDirectory that I based on the LDAP
stuff. The LDAP modules didn't work for me because they want to bind
anonymously and retrieve the crypted password, whereas
Hi!
Imho thats very useful!
Some generic plugin or extending C::P::Auth to combine two auth stores, one for
authentication and one as source for the roles etc. would be great!
-Alex
-Original Message-
From: Johannes Plunien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 6:46
Johannes Plunien wrote:
Hi,
there's already C::A::Store::LDAP to authenticate users against LDAP
servers. This module fetches a user from LDAP and checks his password
(if you told C::A::Credential::Password password_type = self_check).
In most of my apps i don't want to fetch the user from
13 matches
Mail list logo
