Re: [cayugabirds-l] DEC Mixed messages?

I don't think it's a mixed message because no hunting and no discharge are different. No discharge would include target shooting. On Tuesday, November 17, 2015, Geo Kloppel wrote: > I was curious to know if DEC had made revisions to hunting regulations > with respect to

RE: [cayugabirds-l] DEC Mixed messages?

As I pointed out, in the email I bounced to the list, the 2005 city court challenge upheld the right of NYS to regulate lakeshore activity irrespective of any local ordinance. It concerned dog walkers, but presumably would apply equally to anyone ticketed for hunting. I appreciate the clarity

RE: [cayugabirds-l] DEC Mixed messages?

Kohlenberg Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 10:26 AM To: geoklop...@gmail.com; CAYUGABIRDS-L <cayugabird...@list.cornell.edu> Subject: RE: [cayugabirds-l] DEC Mixed messages? As I pointed out, in the email I bounced to the list, the 2005 city court challenge upheld the right of NYS to regulate lak

RE: [cayugabirds-l] DEC Mixed messages?

gt; Cc: CAYUGABIRDS-L <cayugabird...@list.cornell.edu> Subject: Re: [cayugabirds-l] DEC Mixed messages? Hi John, Gary, David and all, Then every municipality, village, town, city, county, borough, etcetera that wanted to get out from under the state's exclusive authority to regulate hunting could