Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Video Codec Rate Table

2008-02-14 Thread Matthew Saskin
They are, he was asking for both. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't making things up by saying CM uses fixed bandwidth values per call for location-based CAC. -matt ccievoice1 wrote: 24K/80K are for voice codec, aren't they? I think Earnieball78 was wondering on the video codec... On Fri

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Video Codec Rate Table

2008-02-14 Thread ccievoice1
24K/80K are for voice codec, aren't they? I think Earnieball78 was wondering on the video codec... On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Matthew Saskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It was my understanding that CallManager uses the fixed numbers > (24k/80k) for location based CAC regardless of the sam

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Video Codec Rate Table

2008-02-14 Thread Matthew Saskin
It was my understanding that CallManager uses the fixed numbers (24k/80k) for location based CAC regardless of the sampling rate. Can anyone confirm/deny this? -matt Earnieball78 wrote: Matt, Thanks for your response. Well, that would depend on the sampling rate. I don't have any problems wit

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Video Codec Rate Table

2008-02-14 Thread Vik Malhi
I'm checking on that, I'm kicking myself for never saving a local copy. Vik Malhi CCIE Voice Instructor / Developer - IPexpert, Inc. CCIE Voice #13890 CCSI #31584 URL: http://www.IPexpert.com Toll Free: +1.866.225.8064 International: +1.810.326.1444 _ Fr

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Re;Re: QoS question

2008-02-14 Thread jason sung
correct. On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 3:43 PM, DSCP46EF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Jason, > > To over come from this 75% limitation, we should use "max-reserved > bandwidth" - am I right? > > Cheers > Frog > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 4:27 AM, jason sung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Frog

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Re;Re: QoS question

2008-02-14 Thread DSCP46EF
Thanks Jason, To over come from this 75% limitation, we should use "max-reserved bandwidth" - am I right? Cheers Frog On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 4:27 AM, jason sung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frog, > > ValueB> this is not the usable bandwidth, You are sitll allowed to use all > 364800. > The (7

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper and Dialpeers

2008-02-14 Thread Devildoc
Hello, Would someone kindly explain to me the relationship between the inbound and outbound dialpeers on the gatekeeper router and the RAS calls coming in from and going out to CCM and BR2? For example, the HQ-RTR is the gk that has 2 registered local zones; one from CCM with prefix of 1# a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] G729 SIP Trunk on CCM

2008-02-14 Thread Devildoc
Hi Vik, The SIP G711 configuration went ok today, and for some reasons that it didn't yesterday. Anyway... thanks for your help. JD From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] G729 SIP Trunk on CCMDate: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:04:18 -0800 Can you v

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Video Codec Rate Table

2008-02-14 Thread Mark Cardwell
Is there a copy available on IPexpert/Proctors website Cheers! Mark Cardwell | System Engineer | Presidio Networked Solutions | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Cell: 571.225.0132 | Office: 301.623.2000| FAX: 301.313.2400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Video Codec Rate Table

2008-02-14 Thread Vik Malhi
It is in the SRND entitled "IP Video Telephony SRND for Cisco CallManager 4.1". This appears to have been removed from the the Cisco website a couple of weeks ago. Vik Malhi CCIE Voice Instructor / Developer - IPexpert, Inc. CCIE Voice #13890 CCSI #31584 URL: http://www.IPexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Video Codec Rate Table

2008-02-14 Thread Earnieball78
Matt, Thanks for your response. Well, that would depend on the sampling rate. I don't have any problems with the voice codecs, however I do want to use the table for the video part. Anybody knows where they got the table that is at the begining of the workbook? Thanks! Matthew

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Video Codec Rate Table

2008-02-14 Thread Matthew Saskin
Don't quote me, but I believe audio is fixed as 24k for G.729 and 80K for G.711 not sure on video... -matt Earnieball78 wrote: Hello all, I'm am trying to find out where one would fine the table that lists the audio and video codec rates information required to configure locations based CAC

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question

2008-02-14 Thread Vik Malhi
You can look at a table on page 33 of the QOS SRND for this information. Vik Malhi CCIE Voice Instructor / Developer - IPexpert, Inc. CCIE Voice #13890 CCSI #31584 URL: http://www.IPexpert.com Toll Free: +1.866.225.8064 International: +1.810.326.1444 _ F

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Video Codec Rate Table

2008-02-14 Thread Earnieball78
Hello all, I'm am trying to find out where one would fine the table that lists the audio and video codec rates information required to configure locations based CAC in CCM? Thanks! - Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Podd 22 ISDN

2008-02-14 Thread Vik Malhi
With H323 you are missing the h323-gatewa bind srcaddr command in the source interface on the router. WIth MGCP I have seen sporadic problems when you bind mgcp packets to a vlan/loopback interface- so undo the mgcp bind commands. Vik Malhi CCIE Voice Instructor / Developer - IPexpert, Inc. CCIE

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ATA issue

2008-02-14 Thread Tyson Scott
The ata doesn't understand an auxilary vlan 2/9 POD29-ATA-186connected 390a-halfa-10 10/100BaseTX set port auxiliaryvlan 2/9 490 set port name 2/9 POD29-ATA-186 This is not correct change it to set port aux 2/9 1 set vlan 490 2/9 On 2/14/08, Mark Cardwell <[EM

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ATA issue

2008-02-14 Thread Mark Cardwell
I was on POD 29 last night and believe I had the port on the 6500 setup correctly to the ATA (set port VLAN 490). The ATA was showing up as connected (sh port 2/9) and under CDP neighbor. All other devices setup on the 6500 for POD 2/9 I had no issue. The ATA would not release an IP of 10.1.200.125

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Podd 22 ISDN

2008-02-14 Thread Edward French
Is anyone else having problems with inbound PRI today? I am on pod 22 and I am getting Network out of order at BR1. Both Br1 and HQ can call out but neither can receive. The E1R2 can receive. I have tried Br1 as both h323 and MGCP still no luck. I also have tries significant digits all with a tr

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question

2008-02-14 Thread jason sung
G729 on frame-relay with FR.12 is not 24K it is 28K so your 5 g729 calls will be 5 x 28 = 140 On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:36 AM, boonchin .ng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Jason, > Thanks for the explanation. > > So, I would like to understand another scenario. > > Similarly, I have a 384

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question

2008-02-14 Thread boonchin .ng
Hi Jason, Thanks for the explanation. So, I would like to understand another scenario. Similarly, I have a 384K frame-relay WAN link, so I have: ! map-class frame-relay FRTS-384 frame-relay cir 364800 frame-relay bc 3648 frame-ralay be 0 frame-relay mincir 364800 frame-relay fragment 480 !

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Re;Re: QoS question

2008-02-14 Thread jason sung
Frog, ValueB> this is not the usable bandwidth, You are sitll allowed to use all 364800. The (75%) is the total amount you can configure under your policy maps. For example: CIR-364800 class rtp priority percent 50 class sig bandwidth percent 10 class any bandwidth percent 15 class class-default (

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Re;Re: QoS question

2008-02-14 Thread DSCP46EF
Hi, Question: Lets say today bandwidth is 384 and we can only use 75% of configured bandwidth by default. valueA = Cir = 95% of Bandwidth = 364kbps ValueB = Usable bandwidth = 75% of total bandwidth = 291 kbps (if it is less than what is required for qos then max-reserve bandwidth kicks in) MY Q

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Intermittent one-way voice issue

2008-02-14 Thread boonchin .ng
Okay, And what to verify from "sh voice port sum" ? Thanks. On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Scott Mael (smael) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > your right. > > If this is an intermittent problem with the same ip's, then you could do a > "sh voice port sum" on the router and see if it is happenin

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Intermittent one-way voice issue

2008-02-14 Thread Scott Mael (smael)
your right. If this is an intermittent problem with the same ip's, then you could do a "sh voice port sum" on the router and see if it is happening when it comes in a particular channel. If so, then it probably is a DSP problem. Scott From: boonchin .ng [mail

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Intermittent one-way voice issue

2008-02-14 Thread boonchin .ng
Hi Scott, Is intermittent on a same phone!! For example, on a conversation, one-way voice issue might happened just for 10seconds, then normal for around 5minutes and one-way voice issue again for 10seconds and back to normal. Am just thinking, would this be the DSP issue or the E1 card? Thanks.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question

2008-02-14 Thread jason sung
When you have minCIR configured the LLQ picks 33% of that. If you do not have minCIR configured than the CIR divided by two is used in the calculation. In your example, since you have mincir configured. Priority bandwidth will be 364800 * .33 = about 120K LLQ will allow you to configure 75% of

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Intermittent one-way voice issue

2008-02-14 Thread Scott Mael (smael)
Does this happen intermittent on phones on different networks? If so, most one-way audio issues are routing problems. If these are H323 gwys., make sure you have the inbound calls sourced from the proper interfaces. Scott From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Intermittent one-way voice issue

2008-02-14 Thread ccievoice1
Hi all, Just wondering what might caused *intermittent one-way voice issue *for an incoming pstn call to CallManager controlled IP Phones? Thanks.

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question

2008-02-14 Thread ccievoice1
Hi, I have a 384K frame-relay link. Hence, I have: ! map-class frame-relay FRTS-384 frame-relay cir 364800 frame-relay bc 3648 frame-ralay be 0 frame-relay mincir 364800 frame-relay fragment 480 ! Now, I want to do LLQ on voice, so: ! policy-map LLQ class media priority percent 33 clas

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question

2008-02-14 Thread boonchin .ng
Hi, I have a 384K frame-relay link. Hence, I have: ! map-class frame-relay FRTS-384 frame-relay cir 364800 frame-relay bc 3648 frame-ralay be 0 frame-relay mincir 364800 frame-relay fragment 480 ! Now, I want to do LLQ on voice, so: ! policy-map LLQ class media priority percent 33 clas