Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE primary extension to mailbox access

2008-04-02 Thread Paul and Bobs
I am hitting the bug as explained above. I removed the dial-plan and it worked. I added the dialplan and changed the extension in CUE to OTHER (e.164 number) and it worked. Thanks guys On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Erick Bergquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does the user in CUE have the righ

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLP serialization delay

2008-04-02 Thread Jonathan Charles
Correction, 20ms, you are right bad at math Jonathan On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:42 AM, Jonathan Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Serialization delay is a function of how long it will take to get X > bits onto the wire at speed Y > > And is simply X/Y > > So, a 1500-byte ping will take

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLP serialization delay

2008-04-02 Thread Jonathan Charles
Serialization delay is a function of how long it will take to get X bits onto the wire at speed Y And is simply X/Y So, a 1500-byte ping will take 214ms to be put on the wire at a line speed of 56 bps (1500*8)/56000 = .214 So, you list the speed of the circuit 768000 The fragment size

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE primary extension to mailbox access

2008-04-02 Thread Erick Bergquist
Does the user in CUE have the right extension configured that the call is coming from? I've seen that be the issue before and changing it and/or also setting the e.164 number to where it is coming from gets it going. You could also briefly get rid of the dialplan pattern command if it is doing som

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE primary extension to mailbox access

2008-04-02 Thread Jonathan Charles
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps5520/products_field_notice09186a008023cfe2.shtml I don't think it applies... But it might... Jonathan On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > self enroll > > I see from another reply it could be a bug with

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH H323

2008-04-02 Thread Mark Snow
Did you have the command 'dcm-manager music-on-hold' ? You still need that one. Mark Snow Sr Technical Instructor IPexpert, Inc. Sent from my iPhone On Apr 2, 2008, at 9:23 PM, "jason sung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Not SRST, I meant an actual H323 gateway. Yes your assumption is correct,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE primary extension to mailbox access

2008-04-02 Thread Paul and Bobs
self enroll I see from another reply it could be a bug with the dial plan I will look into that Thanks On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Jonathan Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What do you mean by 'access the mailbox'? Do you mean try to leave a > message or try to self-enroll? > > > > Jo

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab restrictions

2008-04-02 Thread Scott Monasmith
Actually, there are a few 'minor' commands you are not allowed to change/configure and they are listed on the first page of the exam. Otherwise, the lab questions will let you know whether or not you can do certain things. Read the entire exam carefully! On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Jonathan

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Shaping for FRF.12

2008-04-02 Thread Scott Monasmith
??? - I don't understand. You can configure LFI either can't you? What is the difference below? 1) policy-map shape class class-default shape average 729600 7296 0 map-class frame-relay frf12 frame-relay fragment 960 service-policy out shape 2) map-class frame-relay frf12 frame-relay frag

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Shaping for FRF.12

2008-04-02 Thread jason sung
One reason you might want to use FRF.12 over legacy FRTS is because you can fragment the packets. On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Scott Monasmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does it matter if you use FRTS or legacy FRTS with FRF.12? Is there really > any difference? Why would you use one over

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MLP serialization delay

2008-04-02 Thread jason sung
Can someone confirm my calculations? I am trying to calculate delay based on port speed and CIR. Port speed: 768 CIR: 384 fragment size = 768 *10/8 = 960 delay = fragment size *8/ CIR = 960*8/384 = 20 ms 20 ms sounds too high though TIA

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Shaping for FRF.12

2008-04-02 Thread Scott Monasmith
Does it matter if you use FRTS or legacy FRTS with FRF.12? Is there really any difference? Why would you use one over the other? -- "There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't"

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH H323

2008-04-02 Thread jason sung
Not SRST, I meant an actual H323 gateway. Yes your assumption is correct, this is MoH to the PSTN PRI trunk. Here is what I did. Since it worked with MGCP, i configured siteB router as MGCP and pulled CCM trace. Next I wiped out MGCP and configured as H323 gateway to compare CCM traces, but now

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH H323

2008-04-02 Thread Mark Snow
It wouldn't work - Multicast doesn't allow transcoders. Are you in SRST fallback when you are stating that you are in H323? Also I assume this is MoH to the PSTN PRI Trunk - since IP phones speak SCCP not MGCP or H323 - am I correct on that assumption? Anyway - next test you would need to do

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE primary extension to mailbox access

2008-04-02 Thread jason sung
dialplan pattern bug. have you verified that??? On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > I am having an issue with my CUE. Whenever I setup a new mailbox for a > user and try to access the mailbox it is saying that I can only access it > from the primary e

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH H323

2008-04-02 Thread jason sung
Region is set to 711, streaming service is set to 711 and 729. 729 works no 711. If i change the streaming service to 711 only, N0 MOH On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Jonathan Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, wait > > The region is set to 711-only, the MOH is set to 711-only, the > v

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE primary extension to mailbox access

2008-04-02 Thread Jonathan Charles
What do you mean by 'access the mailbox'? Do you mean try to leave a message or try to self-enroll? Jonathan On undefined, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > I am having an issue with my CUE. Whenever I setup a new mailbox for a user > and try to access the mailbox it is saying t

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH H323

2008-04-02 Thread Jonathan Charles
Well, wait The region is set to 711-only, the MOH is set to 711-only, the voice-class codec is set to 711 as first preference, but 729 works... What is the region for the base voice stream? Jonathan On undefined, jason sung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is weird, I set the voice class to

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH H323

2008-04-02 Thread jason sung
This is weird, I set the voice class to use 711 as 1st preference and both codecs work I set it back to the way I had it g729 1st and 711 stops working. I thought codec would be negotiated on voice-class codec. no? I am going to erase and do everything over. On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Jonat

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE primary extension to mailbox access

2008-04-02 Thread Paul and Bobs
Hi I am having an issue with my CUE. Whenever I setup a new mailbox for a user and try to access the mailbox it is saying that I can only access it from the primary extension for security reasons thens hangs up. This happens on all new mailboxes. Paul

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Inbound calls proctorlabs

2008-04-02 Thread Mark Snow
Nope - doesn't work that way - read the rest of the thread that came in a few minutes ago :) -- Mark Snow CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security) CCSI #31583 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits! Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.309.413.40

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Inbound calls proctorlabs

2008-04-02 Thread Mark Snow
Indeed - take a break! it can sometimes be just as important as hard study. I knew you knew that one anyway ;-) -- Mark Snow CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security) CCSI #31583 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits! Telephone: +1.810.326.144

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH H323

2008-04-02 Thread jason sung
yes preference 1 is g729 On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Jonathan Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A voice-class codec on the dial peer would do it, with no G.711 on > it... What are the codec preferences? > > What is preference 1? Is it G.729a? > > > > > > Jonathan > > On undefined, jason su

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH H323

2008-04-02 Thread Jonathan Charles
A voice-class codec on the dial peer would do it, with no G.711 on it... What are the codec preferences? What is preference 1? Is it G.729a? Jonathan On undefined, jason sung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, I eliminated the 1st option by only allowing g711. (removed g729 under > ip streamin

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Inbound calls proctorlabs

2008-04-02 Thread Jonathan Charles
I am confused by this statement: "I have the gateways expecting 10 digits on inbound calls and have external phone number masks assigned to make the phone numbers 10 digits long. " If your gateways are sending 10 digits, and you are expecting 10 digits, and your phones have 4 digits, then you eit

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH H323

2008-04-02 Thread jason sung
Ok, I eliminated the 1st option by only allowing g711. (removed g729 under ip streaming services) 2nd option you mention. How would that happen? On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Jonathan Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And we know from Mark Snow that the region setting only says 'this is >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH H323

2008-04-02 Thread Jonathan Charles
And we know from Mark Snow that the region setting only says 'this is the MAXIMUM bandwidth' we can use, so if it set to G.711, then G.729 is still available for use. If you want it to use G.711 for MoH disable G.729 under the IP Voice Media Streaming App Service Parameter Or. Your H.323 destina

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Inbound calls proctorlabs

2008-04-02 Thread Jacob Owen
Mark, You are a genius, labbing too often can actually make you less effective if you don't rest and let it sink in. Thanks again. --- Mark Snow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > External Number Mask is only used on Outgoing calls > to make the DN > look like its full DID if the checkbox is checked

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Inbound calls proctorlabs

2008-04-02 Thread Mark Snow
External Number Mask is only used on Outgoing calls to make the DN look like its full DID if the checkbox is checked on the outgoing Route Pattern (and for AAR purposes) - but it will not get a call inbound from a PSTN or any other GW or Trunk to route the call to that DN. You must either u

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Inbound calls proctorlabs

2008-04-02 Thread Jacob Owen
All, I have been getting alot better with voice while using the proctorlabs setup but tonight is making me question what I am doing! :) I can't seem to get calls to work from the PSTN (IP Blue) into BR1 or HQ. I have the gateways configured correctly and have inbound to outbound calls working fi

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH H323

2008-04-02 Thread jason sung
I have a small problem. My multicast MOH works fine at the Remote site using MGCP, but fails to use g711 at remote site when I use H323. CallManager configurations stay the same. When I switch from H323 to MGCP everything works fine, if I switch back to H323, MOH works only for g729 and not g711.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Hunt groups

2008-04-02 Thread Jonathan Charles
Which raises another question. Since the labs use a web link to UniverCD and UniverCD is a complete disaster of dead links... are they now migrating the labs to the new Doc location? Jonathan On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Mark Snow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well - without giving you the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FW: Second Try: LFI in the same interface for 2 PVC's, one of them a High Speed Link

2008-04-02 Thread Mark Snow
Then I would need to know what the specific Task is asking in order to answer your question. Please respond with a Task as it might be given to your - possibly one from our WB or one you have come up with yourself. Again - there is no answer without know what the task was to begin with! :)

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FW: Second Try: LFI in the same interface for 2 PVC's, one of them a High Speed Link

2008-04-02 Thread Sanchez Galarza, Gustavo - (Col)
Yes. For the LAB preparation. Gustavo Sánchez From: Mark Snow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Miércoles, 02 de Abril de 2008 12:40 p.m. To: Sanchez Galarza, Gustavo - (Col) Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCI

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPMA AAR

2008-04-02 Thread Mark Snow
AAR and IPMA are inherently incompatible in CUCM 4.1 - as is AAR with ANY CTI Route Points. -- Mark Snow CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security) CCSI #31583 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits! Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.309.413.409

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FW: Second Try: LFI in the same interface for 2 PVC's, one of them a High Speed Link

2008-04-02 Thread Mark Snow
In real life or for CCIE Lab preparation? Because the answers to which you are configuring for are VERY different. :) For CCIE Lab preparation - you are to ONLY do whatever the lab tells you to do for a given task - so I have no quick answer to your question - it would completely depend on t

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] calling out the CME E1

2008-04-02 Thread Mark Snow
I am not at all sure what your question is - or really what it relates to other than something about dialing out an E1 and something about SIP. Clarify please? -- Mark Snow CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security) CCSI #31583 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. A Cisco Learning Partner - We Acce

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Hunt groups

2008-04-02 Thread Mark Snow
Well - without giving you the answer (learn to fish method :) - how could you find out yourself? Remember being resourceful is being a CCIE. Hint - Test it yourself - or if you don't have immediate access to a pod - then http://cisco.com/univercd and lookup the Cmd Reference to see what tha

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Hunt groups

2008-04-02 Thread Jonathan Charles
Is that a hunt timer or a timeout for the entire hunt? Jonathan On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 4:48 AM, ccievoice1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I will customized the timeout value, as default is 180s > > > ! > ephone-hunt 1 sequential > pilot 3111 > list 3100,3101 > final > timeout 6 > ! > > HTH >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME Hunt groups

2008-04-02 Thread ccievoice1
I will customized the timeout value, as default is 180s ! ephone-hunt 1 sequential pilot 3111 list 3100,3101 final timeout 6 ! HTH On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Howdy > When creating hunt groups and haveing the hunt group hunt to phone 1 on > s