Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] issues with 6608 port going faulty

2008-08-01 Thread Mark Snow
Jane, All, Right - Vik doesn't mention to reset the individual port or to disable it - because on a 6608 blade architecture - the ports are all tied together using 1 single port processor for all 8 ports. So disabling one really confuses the blade. When in doubt with the 6608 - it is

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] issues with 6608 port going faulty

2008-08-01 Thread Mark Snow
I don't know how much it is I hope they wouldn't make you do this in the lab but rather I wonder if they *would even allow* one to do this in the lab if everything else failed :-) I am hesitant to think that they would allow you (much less do it themselves) touch the hardware to this extent

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] issues with 6608 port going faulty

2008-08-01 Thread Mark Snow
Excellent steps their Nguyen! -- Mark Snow CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security) Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.309.413.4097 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Join our free online support and peer group communities: http://www.IPexpert.com/communities --

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCM SIP trunk and BR1 phone location CAC

2008-08-01 Thread Preethi Thamina
In the IPExpert Workbook 4 lab M (Section 30), we are required to set Location bandwidth to BR1 to 24K. I have IPIPGW configured on the HQ-RTR. Calls from BR2 use H323 and arrive at CCM using SIP through the IPIPGW. Calls to HQ phones work fine. Calls to BR1 phones fail because the Location

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPMA-ICD corresident

2008-08-01 Thread Turpin, Mark
Just of curiosity what is your Services URL set to in Enterprise Parameters? -mark -- MARK TURPIN | Senior Consultant - UC | Calence / Insight Networking Solutions | calence.com https://myaccess.calence.com/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.calen ce.com/ t. 314.656.2315

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPMA-ICD corresident

2008-08-01 Thread Diego Macias
Hello Mark I was making a mistake in the url for the ip phone service. Thanks a lot DM From: Turpin, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Viernes, 01 de Agosto de 2008 12:08 p.m. To: Diego Macias; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCM SIP trunk and BR1 phone location CAC

2008-08-01 Thread Turpin, Mark
You will use a transcoder for this scenario. It sounds like you've already figured out the transcoder on the IPIPGW for G.729 h323 to G.711 SIP. It sounds like you just need to invoke the transcoder in HQ for the G.711 to G.729 transcoding to BR1. -- MARK TURPIN | Senior Consultant -

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 5, GK never sees BRQ for 729...

2008-08-01 Thread Jonathan Charles
So, I configured a GK with a single zone, I have a route group with a 711-only trunk to GK and a 729-only trunk to GK.. (711 first), BRQ Enabled is set to true... First call goes 711, works fine... second call always says busy. The GK never sees a BRQ from CCM... If I change the bw to 256, 2

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ccie

2008-08-01 Thread Turpin, Mark
21649 Thanks Vik! Sent from my iPhone

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 5, GK never sees BRQ for 729...

2008-08-01 Thread Jonathan Charles
OK, here are the debugs from CCME and the GK... Still no BRQs... not sure why I am getting the ARJ... First call succeeds with G711, second call fails. CCME#deb ras H.323 RAS Messages debugging is on CCME#term mon CCME# Aug 1 18:58:24.988: h323chan_chn_process_read_socket Aug 1

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 5, GK never sees BRQ for 729...

2008-08-01 Thread Jonathan Charles
Cuz that was long, I did notice this ARJ from CCME: Aug 1 18:58:33.333: ARJ (seq# 2138) rcvdparse_arj_nonstd: ARJ Nonstd decode succeeded, remlen = -2107606760 A search found no hits... .131 is the CCME, .124 is CCM .63 is the GK... Jonathan On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Jonathan Charles

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] BR1 MGCP T1 connection problem

2008-08-01 Thread Hardesty, Scott
All, I am having troubles getting the BR1 MGCP PRI operational. The controller is up and the serial interface is up but when running a debug q921 I do not see any traffic. L2 is TEI_Assigned. I expected to at lease see q921 on the link regardless of my configurations (assuming at a minimal