Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCM 4.1 SQL change users for new server

Thanks Cliff, I will try your first option a shot. If not, I am really running out of time and I no longer have my installation disks anymore, CD was damaged. So, I will move on with single CCM for now. I think I can get most tests done and use proctorlabs for other stuff. Thanks for your help!

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCM 4.1 SQL change users for new server

I don't think that will work. On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:03 AM, CCIE OSL wrote: > Yep! > > Not too fun,, > > > > > Duy Nguyen wrote: > > Are you trying to make a subscriber from the publisher vm? > > On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 11:36 PM, CCIE OSL wrote: > >> >> I run into little minor problem today.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCM 4.1 SQL change users for new server

Yep! Not too fun,, Duy Nguyen wrote: Are you trying to make a subscriber from the publisher vm? On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 11:36 PM, CCIE OSL > wrote: I run into little minor problem today. I am using VM for my home lab, I just copied one VM to another PC

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCM 4.1 SQL change users for new server

Jin, When SQL Server is installed, it buries the name of the server in the system tables as part of the installation. While it's possible to "fix" this, it is not a procedure for the faint at heart. Even with the time it takes to reload, Cisco will openly tell you that they will NOT support a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCM 4.1 SQL change users for new server

Are you trying to make a subscriber from the publisher vm? On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 11:36 PM, CCIE OSL wrote: > > I run into little minor problem today. > I am using VM for my home lab, I just copied one VM to another PC and now I > am trying assign it as second CCM. > I change IP and the Name of

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCM 4.1 SQL change users for new server

I run into little minor problem today. I am using VM for my home lab, I just copied one VM to another PC and now I am trying assign it as second CCM. I change IP and the Name of server. Well, now the SQL server is complaining. It looks like I have change all the database users from old server S

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Question

RE: BACD QuestionAssume one line is 3001 and the other is 3002. Pick up line 3001 and dial 3002. Answer 3002. Have 3002 put call on hold. Have 3001 also put call on hold. Now both endpoints are busy. Call into BACD should work correctly with timers assuming 3001 and 3002 are the only me

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Question

Hi Cliff: I maked them single channel, however I do not get the second part, having them call each other, how did you do this. Thanks in advance. Regards, Jose From: Cliff McGlamry [mailto:cl...@mcglamry.net] Sent: Domingo, Abril 05, 2009 8:28 PM To: Jose Gregorio Linero (jline

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2

Cliff is saying maybe the phone is in a partition where the trunk has a CSS where it wouldn't ever reach the phone. The best is to leave everything without partitions and then start hardening from that point. On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Erwan Erwan wrote: > hi cliff > > > CCM is 4 digit,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2

hi cliff     CCM is 4 digit,   the debug dialpeer is showing correct , hit incoming and goint to dial-peer 3000, which go to CCM (and CCM will take 4 digit)     ok i will using the incoming Transaltion pattern as u suggest in my next session, tks for help   erwan       --- On Mon, 4/6/09, Cliff

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2

So is the 4 digit extension reachable from the incoming call search space on the gateway? And silly questionis 3001 configured into the partition it is supposed to be in? I've had that bite me before. - Original Message - From: Erwan Erwan To: Duy Nguyen Cc: ccie_voi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2

hi,   right,   and CCM, significan is 4 digit   tks   --- On Mon, 4/6/09, Duy Nguyen wrote: From: Duy Nguyen Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2 To: e_er...@yahoo.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, "Cliff McGlamry" Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 11:30 AM So 21313001 is

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2

So 21313001 is sending to CCM, how is that trunk configured for significant digits? On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Erwan Erwan wrote: > hi Cliff and Day, > > right, ext 3001 in CCM, the debug that I sent before, showing call hit > the BR-2 and correct dial-peer in BR-2 (dial-peer 1 and 30

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2

Actually, you're missing some stuff here. You're not showing the voice-port, but let me take a swing at this just on paper. I'm a bit puzzled by this setup as the international location is normally the CME in the stuff I've seen, but we'll go with it being part of HQ or BR1: int loopback 0

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2

hi Cliff and Day,   right, ext 3001 in CCM    , the debug that I sent before, showing call hit the BR-2 and correct dial-peer in BR-2  (dial-peer 1 and 3000)   here is my config   BR-2 --- voice translation-rule 20  rule 1 /^3.../ /44232141\0/ ! ! voice translation-profile

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2

Make sure you have DID configured on the inbound dial-peer pots. On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Erwan Erwan wrote: > hi, > > calling from PSTN to BR-2 , can not go thru, and "debug isdn q931" saying > "network-out of order" , dial-peer is *correct * > ** > anybody have idea, what happen ? >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2

How about posting the dial-peer so we can see it (actually the full config would be better). But in looking at this, I can guess what the problem is. The number hitting the gateway is 21313001. I don't have your config, but the extension should be 3001. I personally always have a transl

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2

hi,   calling from PSTN  to BR-2 , can not go thru, and "debug isdn q931" saying "network-out of order"   , dial-peer is correct    anybody have idea, what happen ?    Progress Ind i = 0x8183 - Origination address is non-ISDN      Calling

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] RDU open slot

There is currently an opening for this Wednesday April 8 for 1 voice CCIE slot. It's been up there for over 24 hours at this point, and I'd hate to see it go to waste because someone who needed it didn't know it was available. Cliff

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Question

RE: BACD QuestionI had issues with this, and Vik pointed out something very interesting. The timer is not accurate unless it's getting busy back from the lines it is attempting in the hunt group. So, make them single channel, and busy them out by having them call each other. If you do this, y

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Question

Hi all, any comments on this? -Original Message- From: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 01:04 PM Eastern Standard Time To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject:BACD Question Hi: I have the next configuration for drop through and it is work

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPMA

it is the primary processing engine, question is regarding ipma, but it will be the same for ipcc, test it out you will know. Duy Nguyen wrote: Why would the Sub be primary for IPCC? On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Tech Guy wrote: Do one use the same logic in IPCC, Unity, H323 Dial-peer

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 38, Issue 28

fter 60 seconds. Thanks in advance. Regards, Jose -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090405/be12b9e5/attachment-0001.htm -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbe

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question on CUE VPIM

Thanks Arshad, unfortunately this was on vrack, and I didn't capture the configurations. I will try again when I got lab time again. Thanks for your feedback, I'm thinking just that something was wrong with the module, everything else was working properly. From: Arshad Dhunna [mailto:arshad.dhu

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPMA

Why would the Sub be primary for IPCC? On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Tech Guy wrote: > Do one use the same logic in IPCC, Unity, H323 Dial-peers; MGCP, > Gatekeeper, etc? i.e. The Sub shld be the primary and Pub the secondary? > > Tech Guy > > > > - Original Message - > *From:* saral

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPMA

Do one use the same logic in IPCC, Unity, H323 Dial-peers; MGCP, Gatekeeper, etc? i.e. The Sub shld be the primary and Pub the secondary? Tech Guy - Original Message - From: saralilin2...@yahoo.co.jp To: marwa ; OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 8:27 AM S

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPA Agent state ready auto

Hi, I doubt whether it is supported in CRS 4.x... 2009/4/5 Onur Tufekci > What is the paramater that you use other then ID Ext Pwd? Is it state? > > On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Arshad Dhunna > wrote: > >> Yes it is possible in service parameter in IPCC >> >> And it is possible in CCM w

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Question

Hi: I have the next configuration for drop through and it is working: application service queue flash:app-b-acd-2.1.0.0.tcl param queue-len 10 param aa-hunt1 3100 param number-of-hunt-grps 1 param queue-manager-debugs 1 ! service aa flash:app-b-acd-aa-2.1.0.0.tcl par

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPMA

In addition to the wizard, it will be worthwhile to practice once or twice without using the IPMA wizard, incase there is a restriction on the exam; also make sure that the wizard is not doing some other stuff. Regarding implementing IPMA with a single partition, I have not watched Vik's video

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPA Agent state ready auto

What is the paramater that you use other then ID Ext Pwd? Is it state? On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Arshad Dhunna wrote: > Yes it is possible in service parameter in IPCC > > And it is possible in CCM with the Url IPAgentLogin.jsp > > --- On *Sun, 5/4/09, Onur Tufekci * wrote: > > > From: On

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPMA

I like to do IPMA from the wizard   I saw Vik video i think i might not be able to understand the same.   If anyone can explain what he is trying to say.   And who do i archieve IPMA with single partition.   I think i am not be able to understand the same.   Thks --- On Sun, 5/4/09, saralilin2...

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPMA

1. pub 2. sub primary, pub sec. there is a video by vik on ipexpert check it out marwa wrote: hi list, i have been configuring ipma with proxy line, i have two questions 1-the url should it point to the pub or the sub 2- when configuring the service parameters, do i put the sub or the pub

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPMA

hi list, i have been configuring ipma with proxy line, i have two questions 1-the url should it point to the pub or the sub 2- when configuring the service parameters, do i put the sub or the pub as the primary server

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPA Agent state ready auto

Yes it is possible in service parameter in IPCC   And it is possible in CCM with the Url IPAgentLogin.jsp --- On Sun, 5/4/09, Onur Tufekci wrote: From: Onur Tufekci Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPA Agent state ready auto To: "Duy Nguyen" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Sunday, 5

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mask the No for Internal & External callers

Use restricted if u want do not want to send the CLID --- On Sun, 5/4/09, oliver rodrigues wrote: From: oliver rodrigues Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mask the No for Internal & External callers To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Sunday, 5 April, 2009, 12:00 AM I have a requirement to

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question on CUE VPIM

The procedure u said its right,   If u are getting the MWI on both the works that means u are fine.   OK,   Can u send me the full VPIM configuration of CUE and Print Screen of Unity also if it work for u.   Thks --- On Sat, 4/4/09, Yung Hung wrote: From: Yung Hung Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]