Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Phones connecting to a CUE

Thanks, the lab seems to imply they are auto-discovered... So, this: sip-ua retry invite 2 timers trying 200 mwi-server ipv4:192.168.29.230 expires 3600 port 5060 transport udp Won't handle MWI? Jonathan On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Vik Malhi wrote: > The SIP phones are not auto-disco

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Phones connecting to a CUE

The SIP phones are not auto-discovered by CUE. You will have to manually add the user accounts, primary extn and mailbox. Plus you will need to configure an MWI mechansim that will work for the SIP phones manually. -- Vik Malhi ­ CCIE #13890 Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Amnesty?

Gang - As all of you guys know - we also ban the email and IP address.it's too bad, but it's gotta be done. Regards, Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244 Founder, President & CEO: - IPexpert, Inc. - Proctor Labs, Inc. - Platinum Solutions Group, LLC. Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com Mobile:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Amnesty?

ccievoicelabs.com Some idiot (kind of funny you mention the "man in the mirror"--the idiot who posted was "named" Mikal Jackson) just posted a set of v2 labs here a couple days ago. Don't know how close they are to the actual lab. For Cisco to decide. Looks like it's based in India according

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Looking for a few good voice engineers

Hah! :) Yes, if it wasn't already known, I hail from the Portland, OR area (unfortunately). On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Michael Ciarfello wrote: > lol. Sorry to clog the list, but humor helps the soul.. And the CCIE > grind. > > I like you, Lloyd. I always liked you. You were always the be

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Amnesty?

That's great. So what can you and your best friend do about companies selling supposed CCIE test questions / test content? That's also a NO NO adn there's also got to be a way to stop that. And it makes the test harder for the rest of us, becasue now they have to play tricks on us and make th

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Looking for a few good voice engineers

lol. Sorry to clog the list, but humor helps the soul.. And the CCIE grind. I like you, Lloyd. I always liked you. You were always the best of them. Best goddamned bartender from Timbuktu to Portland, Maine. Or Portland, Oregon, for that matter. --Jack Torrance

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Looking for a few good voice engineers

It's a step up from Portland! On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Michael Ciarfello wrote: > naaa. Chicago's too small a town. > lol > > -- > *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ > ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Clifford McGlamry [ > c

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Looking for a few good voice engineers

naaa. Chicago's too small a town. lol From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Clifford McGlamry [cmcgla...@forsythe.com] Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 7:20 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [O

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Amnesty?

Yea, Cisco is really coming down on this (it's good thing). During your next audit, you have to PROVE that the CCIE WORKS for you, etc. Just no details are known yet on exactly how that is going to be proven or what mechanisms are acceptible. I'm sure one way would be the Cisco AM / SE statem

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Looking for a few good voice engineers

Good day all. I'm hoping Mark/Vik/Wayne will forgive me for this. As a recent "graduate" of this list, I thought I would pass along an opportunity that currently exists at my company for a voice/R&S engineer. My boss normally has me screen potential candidates, and I suggested we might get be

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Amnesty?

I received this note from Eman a little while ago and he asked me to share it with you. I cannot confirm or deny any of this, but I have been faced with this situation before. For direct questions please contact Eman: e...@ccieflyer.com *CCIE Amnesty Program* What does amnesty mean? Well it h

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IVR prompt upload failed

Thanks to Chris and Bill for prompted response. Yes it is a confirmed bug in IPIVR 7.0.1. And it is fixed in SR3. The bug code is: CSCsq99083. The release doc is here: http://www.cisco.com/web/software/280840578/27317/Release__Notes_for_Unified_CCX_7.0.1_SR3.pdf James __

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] voice command

Because it's VERY possible that the lab may tell you that you're not allowed to use it. if it does, then you REALLY need to know the 'long way' to do the MGCP configuration. -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Phones connecting to a CUE

In IPExpert lab 11.2, it shows this working... And on page 642, it shows the SIP phone being auto-discovered by the CUE... What am I doing wrong? J On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote: > So, I am running a Cisco Unity Express (v 7.0) on a CUCME 2821 > (running 12.4.22T2), a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] voice command

OK, I have tested this to a reasonably great extent. It works fine. The command, isdn busy b_channel 7-24 works perfectly... thank you! I did not know this existed, and considering it was released in 12.1, I feel kinda dumb... So, the question is, why has everyone (including IPExpert, et al) be

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IVR prompt upload failed

When upload .zip file (which contains few .wav files, total size less than 2MB) via IPIVR prompt manager upload page, it failed. Shown error messages: "Filename does not have a valid extension. Only .wav files can be uploaded". When upload single .wav file, it worked. anyone experie

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] voice command

Will that command stay there when ccm config is applied? J On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Peter Slow wrote: > John, >   Saying "no, you're wrong and you'll get 0 points." isn't going to > get you very far. If you want to paste me some show commands showing > something in an informational, cons

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] (no subject)

wmcallis...@vccs.edu ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 4A style versus function

I don't know that it would matter. The originating ANI (the PSTN phone) is what is showing on 1002 when it rings.so caller ID is preserved. It will show a redirecting value of 3000, but I can't think of an issue (barring specific translation rule manipulation) that would make that a show stopper.

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 4A style versus function

looking for opinions on what I could be missing on 2 facets of the tasks. There are 2 things that I'm looking at that are style points that I want to get opinions on. for the calls out via the E1-PRI from the HQ/BR1 sites. creating the dial peer fo the outbound call, is there an advantage / nece

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] voice command

Hi Peter, My experience with this is going back a couple of years.. so its not too fresh in my mind! But that command definitely looks like a good one to try out! Cheers for that. Cheers, Tim On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Peter Slow wrote: > John, > Saying "no, you're wrong and you'll g

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] voice command

Would the DSP's to be allocated to all 24 channels ? Mick From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ctpresident Sent: 20 July 2009 08:27 To: Peter Slow Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] voice command

Nice one Peter! By the looks of it, that could actually make the ccm-manager config and server commands workable! I wouldn't mind testing them myself but maybe Vik or Mark can "see" if there's anything fundamentally wrong with this approach? On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Peter Slow wrote: >