Will that command stay there when ccm config is applied?
J On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Peter Slow<[email protected]> wrote: > John, > Saying "no, you're wrong and you'll get 0 points." isn't going to > get you very far. If you want to paste me some show commands showing > something in an informational, constructive and helpful way, I'd > welcome whatever you have to teach me. I promise to do the same for > you ;) > My thoughts were that a status enquiry should be sent for each > channel at reinitializtion of the D channel, but perhaps that's not > the case or will depend on configuration. Even with that the case, > there is still a command to get around the issue. > > verfakizon#sh run | inc controller|slots > controller T1 2/0 > pri-group timeslots 1-24 > verfakizon#conf t > Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. > verfakizon(config)#int serial 2/0:23 > verfakizon(config-if)#isdn busy b_channel 9-24 > ISDN:Se2/0:23 Warning: D-channel specified in channel range > verfakizon(config-if)#^Z > verfakizon#show isdn serv se 2/0:23 > 1w1d: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by humboldt on vty0 > (10.18.63.131) > PRI Channel Statistics: > ISDN Se2/0:23, Channel [1-24] > Configured Isdn Interface (dsl) 0 > Channel State (0=Idle 1=Proposed 2=Busy 3=Reserved 4=Restart 5=Maint_Pend) > Channel : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 > State : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 > Service State (0=Inservice 1=Maint 2=Outofservice 8=MaintPend 9=OOSPend) > Channel : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 > State : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 > verfakizon# > > Throw that command under the serial int and your calls should avoid > the busied out channels once you fall back to h.323 > > -Pete > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Jonathan Charles<[email protected]> wrote: >> And then you will go into SRST, and your calls will fail, and you will >> get 0 for high availability. >> >> >> Jonathan >> >> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Peter Slow<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Tim, >>> I don't think you shodl end up in this situation. If you've got that >>> service parameter configured in CUCM it should match the timeslot >>> configuration under the controller in IOS - additionally, each channel >>> needs to be brought in service at initialization - even with 24/30 >>> channels configured on the IOS side the network side should tell you >>> that those channels are out of service and the ISDN stack should know >>> not to try to send a call out of them. >>> >>> -Pete >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Tim Smith<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Aha! yep thats the one... had been a while since I'd touched a fractional >>>> PRI. >>>> >>>> Under MGCP with serv parameter they wont fail.. but that is dead on.. you >>>> are stuffed when you flick over to SRST and fallback to H323.. then you get >>>> the full 30 channels as the GW and calls trying to use channels that arent >>>> active. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Tim. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Jonathan Charles <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I didn't say the PRI wouldn't come up. I am saying that your calls will >>>>> fail. >>>>> >>>>> Especially on BR2 with SRST... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> J >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Tim Smith<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > I dont think that is correct. Pretty sure the PRI will come up >>>>> > regardless. >>>>> > >>>>> > The issue with fractional PRI and ccm-manager config is that it >>>>> > provisions >>>>> > all 30 channels automatically, and you cant tell it to provision any >>>>> > less. >>>>> > This causes issues on channel selection for in / outbound calls - i.e. >>>>> > using >>>>> > channels that dont exist. >>>>> > >>>>> > You can use the B-Channel maintenance service parameter to work around >>>>> > this >>>>> > issue for small deployments. (only works for 5 gateways) but it lets you >>>>> > provision all 30 and then busy out the channels you are not using. >>>>> > >>>>> > http://supportwiki.cisco.com/ViewWiki/index.php/The_user_is_unable_to_configure_fractional_or_partial_T1_PRI_with_MGCP_and_Cisco_CallManager >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Cheers, >>>>> > >>>>> > Tim. >>>>> > >>>>> > On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Jonathan Charles <[email protected]> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Sure, but if you use them, you will fail. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Because there is no way you can get a fractional PRI up and running >>>>> >> with MGCP and ccm config... >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Jonathan >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Nish Tarpara<[email protected]> >>>>> >> wrote: >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Hi, >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Please advise if " ccm-manager config " & " ccm-manager config >>>>> >> > server " >>>>> >> > command can be used in voice lab. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Please ignore my last email. >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Regards, >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Nish >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > ________________________________ >>>>> >> > Celebrate a decade of Messenger with free winks, emoticons, display >>>>> >> > pics, >>>>> >> > and more. Get Them Now >>>>> >> > _______________________________________________ >>>>> >> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>>> >> > please >>>>> >> > visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>>> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>>> >> please >>>>> >> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
