Please refer to ipexpert vol 2 lab 3 question 5.3 for answer to this particular
problem.
That explains why CUE goes crazy when QOS is only configured on one PVC...
-Original Message-
From: ccieid1ot [mailto:ccieid...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 28 September 2009 11:40 PM
To: Cisco
Hi ,
I am on the process of building home ccie voice lab . Can somebody suggest
how to go forward in building the pstn simulator ,,,
Thanks
Anu
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Good point. It is a simple way to do that. Lab 5c also points to solve in this
way.
I'm guessing the a SIP Trunk does not support block the name via CUCM config,
but I did not find a doc. to confirm it up to now.
E.g., I tried to block the name in a SIP Trunk to Br2 and I could see the same
I bought an Adtran Atlas 550, but you can also use a router.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:54 AM, anupam TYAGI anuf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
I am on the process of building home ccie voice lab . Can somebody suggest
how to go forward in building the pstn simulator ,,,
Thanks
Anu
You can use an Adtran or just use any platform that will terminate the
necessary 2xT1 and 1xE1.
I use a 3640 w/2x HDV modules, each with a single mft (2T1, 2E1). I
don't know if you are able to look at incoming/outgoing signaling with
the Adtran, but on an IOS platform you are able to see
Aamir,
I haven't bought the second volume yet and you have me scratching my head.
Is it something other / more significant than FRTS defaulting to 56k?
-Jeff
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Aamir Panjwani
aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au wrote:
Please refer to ipexpert vol 2 lab 3 question
I used a 2811 just because they were available here at work.
I have a combination of VWIC2-xMFT-T1/E1 cards populated in it aligned with
the ipexpert configuration for the PSTN router so I can paste their PSTN
configuration into my PSTN router without having to make too many
modifications.
It
CUE is giving following error while integrating with CM. CTI ports and route
poinst are not registered in CMM.
The Cisco Unity Express CTI ports do not register with the Cisco CallManager,
and the JTAPI login failed. Error while determining CCM version -1 error
message appears.
Following link
No, thats the key thing. But the problem is that CIR defaults to ½ of the
port speed (1/2 of 56k), so youre pulling a lot of traffic across a 28k
link.
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Garvas
Sent: Tuesday,
Pretty much the exact thing I did. Since I had a glut of VWIC-2MFT and no
VWIC2-2MFT floating around the lab, I just went the route of assuming a Euro
PRI would be T-1 format. As long as in your mind you keep track of the
difference in the lab (D channel being on 16 vs 23, linecoding / framing
At present Im testing Mobile Voice Access. I have a mgcp PSTN gateway so
I've added another router to allow for h323 hairpin. The H323 router
also is a gateway to a much larger gatekeeper setup. The setup on the
router is as follows:
I have a route pattern 140 that points to the h323 gateway.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090929/43d
97349/attachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:56:02 -0400
From: Mike Thompson mthompson...@gmail.com
Subject: Re
/20090929/43d
97349/attachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:56:02 -0400
From: Mike Thompson mthompson...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Home lab ccie voice-PSTN Simultaor
To: 'Jeff Garvas' j...@cia.net, 'anupam TYAGI'
anuf
Hello Mathew,
Know about that company what do they do ( the best options is if you know
someone over there or visit their website) and see what all you know out of
what all they do. And, of course, refresh your memory with all voice technical
stuff and the voice projects you have done.
Mention your constant training, people like to hear that their engineer's
are always trying to learn new things that will benefit their organizations.
Talk about your background and track record and discuss some of the hardest
projects you've been part of and how you managed them.
On Tue, Sep
Guys, don't forget that in the 'my configs' section on the IPExpert page,
there is a working config for each lab. Within those configs are the
configs to emulate the PSTN router that includes the PSTN and WAN Frame
Relay configuration.
Anyone taking this exam should be able to modify that
Matthew,
Is this a technical interview?
Just focus on your experiences and what you have accomplished in your
career. As far as Cisco voice, you want to go over the solutions that you've
designed and implemented and if you've had to support them as well.and how
they have benefited you end
Has anyone reviewed the PG solution for this question? The PG references a
BACD (presumably CME). I can't find any reference in the question itself
regard CME or in any of the ensuing sections (in fact, am I wrong, there's
not much CME configuration in this mock lab besides the basics.)
Fellow CCIE Voice studiers:
Please note that I asked Mike Down at IP Expert if it was OK before
sending out this e-mail:
I'm not going to be able to use everything that I purchased from IP Expert.
It's definitely the best material out there, but I'm working way too much
overtime for the
I¹ve just checked and the first comment does reference a BACD- this first
comment is clearly out of context and does not belong to the solution for
this question.
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto:
Thanks for the confirmation, Vik. Lng three-day weekend studying, I
thought I was begining to unlearn this stuff :(
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com wrote:
I’ve just checked and the first comment does reference a BACD- this first
comment is clearly out of
this is not a PRI circuit. it is a voice T1
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Pulos, Greg gpu...@doc.gov wrote:
A specific isdn switch type depends on your telco. You must verify with
them what type of switch is terminating the PRI.
If this is the IP Expert labs, then the switch type should
VPIM doesn't seem to be installable under the CUC demo license (I get an
error saying that the VPIM location can not be added because of a license
restriction.) Is there a work around for home labbers?
--
-Shikamaru
___
For more information regarding
I have lost a half a day beating myself up with this.
I got my 2811 last night, so early this morning I started redoing the
Vol 1 labs using my new 2811 instead of the 2621XM that I was using for
BR2.
Running 12.4(24)T1 IOS - Adv Enterprise and CME 7.1.0.1 full. 256 MB
RAM and 256 MB Flash
I
At first glance, it seems okay to me.
Try shutting down the switchports connecting the phones. Then go into voice
register global and do no create profile. The check flash to make sure you
don't have rogue SIP.cnf files. If you find any, delete them.
Then go back to voice
If you checkout the blog notes that Mark Snow put together he advises that
VPIM is not a tested item at the moment.
Best regards
Mick
E: m...@pobox.net.uk
T: +44(0)1626 323592
M: +44(0)77255 18156
F: +44(0)1626 323591
From: Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.com
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009
Right, but as that lab (kind of) pointed out, it's possible in one direction
only. I would still practice HQ to CCME then reconfigure and practice CCME to
HQ without DNS.
That was an EXCELLENT question on the part of IPexpert.
From:
No, you have to buy it. And I don't think it comes with the Cisco demo
licenses you can get from the web site. Haven't tried to confirm. The text on
the web page where it says to enter your MAC address doesn't indicate VPIM is
included.
The good news it, VPIM for UC is MUCH cheaper than it
BK -
Thanks for the reply...
No joy
I had already tried what you had suggested - but I did it again
anyway. Same result.
Phone shows Phone Unprovisioned and the debug tftp events
cycles between Looking for SIPx.cnf, Opened flash:/SIPxxx.cnf,
and Finished
I have tested RSVP CAC few time before and it always works, but this
time not sure what's happening it just won't work. I get not enough
bandwidth on the phone display. Had a look at CCM traces and couldn't
pickup anything obvious.
1) HQ and BR1 RSVP agent is registered in CUCM and
Frustrating.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Nara Shikamaru shikam...@kagadis.comwrote:
Frustrating.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Michael Ciarfello mciarfe...@iplogic.com
wrote:
No, you have to buy it. And I don't think it comes with the Cisco demo
licenses you can get from the
What's show sccp tell you at both routers?
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:42 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just
show sccp output below
HQ
MTP Oper State: ACTIVE - Cause Code: NONE
Active Call Manager: 10.210.210.11, Port Number: 2000
TCP Link Status: CONNECTED, Profile Identifier: 1
Reported Max Streams: 8, Reported Max OOS Streams: 0
Supported Codec: pass-thru, Maximum Packetization Period: N/A
.) Is there a work around for home labbers?
--
-Shikamaru
--
-Shikamaru
--
-Shikamaru
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090929/a367727e/attachment-0001.htm
So they're all registered.
Each of them is in their own MRG, etc.
Did you do a resync bandwidth after making any Location changes?
From: Aamir Panjwani [mailto:aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:13 PM
To: Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
What about the log in the phone? I've found CTL / tftp denied issues this
way.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL USA
jeffrey.gir...@us.army.mil wrote:
BK -
Thanks for the reply...
No joy
I had already tried what you had suggested - but I
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090929/a367727e/attachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:10:33 -0400
From: Mike Thompson mthompson...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL
/attachments/20090929/a367727e/attachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:10:33 -0400
From: Mike Thompson mthompson...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just won't work
To: 'Aamir Panjwani' aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au
was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090929/a367727e/attachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:10:33 -0400
From: Mike Thompson mthompson...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just
Yep all registered in their own MRG/MRGLlocation bandwidth resync
didn't make any difference.
Restarted CCM service too.only thing left is to reboot the gateways
From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 1:48 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani;
attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090929/a367727e/attachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:10:33 -0400
From: Mike Thompson mthompson...@gmail.commailto:mthompson...@gmail.com
Subject: Re
Do you get output if do debug ip rsvp all?
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Aamir Panjwani
[aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 12:22 AM
To: Mike Thompson;
was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090929/a367727e/attachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:10:33 -0400
From: Mike Thompson mthompson...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] vol 2 lab 3 : RSVP just
Please see attached output of debug ip rsvp all from HQ and BR1 side
Test call was made from HQ to BR1
From: Michael Ciarfello [mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 2:25 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani; Mike Thompson; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL |
I am not an RSVP debug expert, but I think this is what's getting you. There
should also be a LOT more output.
Do you have ip rsvp command on all interfaces in the path? Bandwidth on the
WAN interfaces you want to subtract from.
Sep 30 04:34:03.166: RSVP-MSG: 10.10.101.1 _17284-10.10.200.3
Guys,
I have CME 7x loaded on a 2811 here in my lab. I am attaching the config to
this email. I have placed the SIP firmware for a 7960 on the flash, added
the necessary commands into the TFTP-Server command and I have followed Lab
3A fairly closely. I am still recieving Registration Rejected
46 matches
Mail list logo
