Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CallManager 6.x/7.x web page issue......RESOLVED

Thanks a looot Koble That was the proxy which was block CM Web Page... Issue has been resolved now.. Thanks again Kobel, and also very much thanks to Randall, Ashar and other team members Respects and Regards Rashid From: Miron Kobelski

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCM service parameter Mobile Voice Access Number

CCM service paramters MVA number is used when integreting with Mobile Communicator which is not in the blueprint. I can swear Vik does mention this in Volume 1 Walkthrough On 13 January 2011 19:53, Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com wrote: I see what you mean. As a matter of chance I was doing

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Simplest way to record a custom prompt for UCCX?

Hi All , I recording my prompt from following script accept RecordedDOC = Recording (Prompt) successfull writeDOc (Recorded to filename) //file name is string variable with value C:\Program Files\wfavvid\MJ\newmyrecord.wav // RecordedDoc is DOcument variable terminate do i need to

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA is not working !

Hi Miron / Kalyan , thanks for replying. In phone config page , owner is set and it started working perfectly :) Regards, Mritunjay On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com wrote: hi, debug voip ccapi inout will give you the answer what's going on. regards

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 1 4.3

Hi Leslie, As per the zone prefix 1... the display is correct and any calls matching prefix 1... will got to gk-trunk_2 on top priority. What is the previous question which must not be invalidate ? -Shrini _ From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 Question 5.3

Hi Satoshi, Sometimes the PGs uses L2 header 9, 11 or 13. It depends the Cisco documentation used. This is the problem... Here you have a link with a very interesting discussion of this issue and Mark Snow's conclusions http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg06644.html

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 Question 5.3

Hi Francesc, Thank you very much. I read the discussion. It is very interesting. After this I have definitely to use 13. Do you agree? I agree. I will use 13 for calculation from now on, too. Thanks and Regards, Satoshi Satoshi Funabashi Systems Engineer Cisco

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 1 4.3

The previous question is this, The gw-type-prefix table on the gatekeeper should be as shown- only the items in bold are important HQ-RTR(config-gk)#do sh gatekeeper gw buffer used: 510, size: 20480 GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 1#*(Default

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Simplest way to record a custom prompt for UCCX?

Hi, this approach is also interesting, but I see following adventages of the SNU: * you can listen to the recorded prompt and re-record it before saving the final version * the prompts are uploaded directly to prompt repository (no need to upload it manually via web page) Number of steps

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 1 4.3

i'm assuming it will on the output they're not asking for priority if you remove the priority from the zone prefix, by default it sill show as gk-trunk_2, then gk-trunk_1 2011/1/14 Leslie Meade lme...@signal.ca The previous question is this, The gw-type-prefix table on the gatekeeper should

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why RSVP agent breaks xcoder?

I was reading IP Expert CCIE Voice Volume 1 Proctor Guide page 531 of 645 (Lab 10.1). Quoted from the page At this stage we would have broken our inter-cluster calls. I was trying to understand why adding the MTP RSVP agent would break the transcoding. I did multiple tests. Even I had XCode

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why RSVP agent breaks xcoder?

Michael, I can only contribute to your last question. In my opinion, MTP is more scalable because you can always have a lot more MTP software sessions than transcoder, which is always hardware. MTP can be software on IOS and use G.729 and can have way more sessions limited only by the CPU on the