I really hope that this is not a serious question.
Set EPNM, External Phone Number Mask.
Roger Källberg
CCIE #26199 (Voice)
** Sent from my iPhone. Excuse brevity and typographical errors. **
20 feb 2011 kl. 06:21 skrev ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Is the + sign supported on the CIPC?
Khaled
From: roger.kallb...@cygate.se
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 09:46:59 +0100
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Display name on CIPC
I really hope that this is not a serious
I'm having trouble with dialing from the missed calls directory.
Globalization and localization are all working fine. I added the translation
patterns with the called number mask set to per the PG.
DNA gives me this for a missed calls from hq ph1 to br1 ph2:
- *Results Summary*
-
Hi,
If I was asked that if site 1 call site 2 to let the called party number and
type to 1234 and subscriber as for example
So I'll let site one call to appear on site 2 as calling 1234 with type
subscriber
Is the above sentence mean anything for the calling party number or type
Hello,
do you use these route patterns:
* 9?.911 + strip predot + urgent priority (instead of 2 RPs 9.911 and 911)
* 9.011![0-9#] + strip predot + strip trailing hash (instead of 2 RP 9.011!
and 9.011!#)
Theoretically, the first one would conflict with valid local pattern
9.911, but it's
Thanks to everyone who responded. I suspect it was a simple
user/password mistake (docs say username ipexpert, but many replies
said username should be cisco).
Could have sworn that I checked the FTP server and tried that combo, but
it was late and I was tired, so maybe not. :) Thanks again.
Well, I'm pretty certain the problem is the 3725 itself at this point
unfortunately. I brought up the PRI directly between HQ and BR1 and then HQ
and BR2 using the same cards I was using in the 3725 and they came up
correctly immediately with Multiple Frames Established and no errors. I
also
All -
Shoot me a quick email if you have used Cisco equipment that you would like to
sell. Reply directly to me. Thanks!
Matthew Berry, CCIE #26721
Email: matt...@ciscovoiceguru.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/CiscoVoiceGuru
Blog: http://ciscovoiceguru.com
Gregg,
That digit analysis does not have anything relevant, if you want DNA
to display how a Translation Pattern will manipulate a call you would
need to change the following parameter on a server basis:
System Service Parameters Digit Analysis Complexity, change it to
It was the dial-peer, thanks so much!
--- On Sun, 2/20/11, Rogers Ochieng rogersochi...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Rogers Ochieng rogersochi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling between HQ and BR2 w/ CUBE
To: Jason Roth jroc...@yahoo.com
Date: Sunday, February 20, 2011, 6:42 AM
I
Does anyone know if I should be able to add an H.225 Gatekeeper controlled
trunk to a Route Group? It's not showing up in my RG list in CUCM.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab
It can't be directly associated to a route pattern so check there first.
-Original Message-
From: Jay Woods cisco...@live.com
Sender: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 16:54:53
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper to Route
If you have a route pattern pointed directly to a trunk, you are not able to
add it to an RG. Vice Versa is also true.
Brian
- Reply message -
From: Jay Woods cisco...@live.com
Date: Sun, Feb 20, 2011 5:54 pm
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper to Route Group
To:
Is it used somewhere by the route pattern?
Sent from my iPhone
Pls pardon my fat fingers.
On Feb 21, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Jay Woods cisco...@live.com wrote:
Does anyone know if I should be able to add an H.225 Gatekeeper controlled
trunk to a Route Group? It's not showing up in my RG list in
Yes, make sure RP is using it.
duy
ccie #27737 voice
tmobile g2
On Feb 20, 2011 6:03 PM, Jay Woods cisco...@live.com wrote:
Does anyone know if I should be able to add an H.225 Gatekeeper controlled
trunk to a Route Group? It's not showing up in my RG list in CUCM.
That's exactly what the problem was, thank you so much!
To: cisco...@live.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
From: bkvalent...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper to Route Group
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:37:55 -0500
If you have a route pattern pointed directly to a
16 matches
Mail list logo