Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Display name on CIPC

2011-02-20 Thread Roger Källberg
I really hope that this is not a serious question. Set EPNM, External Phone Number Mask. Roger Källberg CCIE #26199 (Voice) ** Sent from my iPhone. Excuse brevity and typographical errors. ** 20 feb 2011 kl. 06:21 skrev ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Display name on CIPC

2011-02-20 Thread khaled Saholy
Is the + sign supported on the CIPC? Khaled From: roger.kallb...@cygate.se To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 09:46:59 +0100 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Display name on CIPC I really hope that this is not a serious

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab3 Task2.4 dialing globalized number from missed calls directory

2011-02-20 Thread Gregg Malcolm
I'm having trouble with dialing from the missed calls directory. Globalization and localization are all working fine. I added the translation patterns with the called number mask set to per the PG. DNA gives me this for a missed calls from hq ph1 to br1 ph2: - *Results Summary* -

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] calling and called party requirements

2011-02-20 Thread voice boy
Hi, If I was asked that if site 1 call site 2 to let the called party number and type to 1234 and subscriber as for example So I'll let site one call to appear on site 2 as calling 1234 with type subscriber Is the above sentence mean anything for the calling party number or type

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Tricks with route patterns

2011-02-20 Thread Miron Kobelski
Hello, do you use these route patterns: * 9?.911 + strip predot + urgent priority (instead of 2 RPs 9.911 and 911) * 9.011![0-9#] + strip predot + strip trailing hash (instead of 2 RP 9.011! and 9.011!#) Theoretically, the first one would conflict with valid local pattern 9.911, but it's

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab3 - Changing CUE License - FTP Issues

2011-02-20 Thread Steve Denney (stdenney)
Thanks to everyone who responded. I suspect it was a simple user/password mistake (docs say username ipexpert, but many replies said username should be cisco). Could have sworn that I checked the FTP server and tried that combo, but it was late and I was tired, so maybe not. :) Thanks again.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cross Connecting PRIs issue

2011-02-20 Thread Mark Reed
Well, I'm pretty certain the problem is the 3725 itself at this point unfortunately. I brought up the PRI directly between HQ and BR1 and then HQ and BR2 using the same cards I was using in the 3725 and they came up correctly immediately with Multiple Frames Established and no errors. I also

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Wanted: Used Genuine Cisco Equipment

2011-02-20 Thread matthew
All - Shoot me a quick email if you have used Cisco equipment that you would like to sell. Reply directly to me. Thanks! Matthew Berry, CCIE #26721 Email: matt...@ciscovoiceguru.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/CiscoVoiceGuru Blog: http://ciscovoiceguru.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab3 Task2.4 dialing globalized number from missed calls directory

2011-02-20 Thread Pablo Meneses
Gregg, That digit analysis does not have anything relevant, if you want DNA to display how a Translation Pattern will manipulate a call you would need to change the following parameter on a server basis: System Service Parameters Digit Analysis Complexity, change it to

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling between HQ and BR2 w/ CUBE

2011-02-20 Thread Jason Roth
It was the dial-peer, thanks so much! --- On Sun, 2/20/11, Rogers Ochieng rogersochi...@gmail.com wrote: From: Rogers Ochieng rogersochi...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling between HQ and BR2 w/ CUBE To: Jason Roth jroc...@yahoo.com Date: Sunday, February 20, 2011, 6:42 AM I

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper to Route Group

2011-02-20 Thread Jay Woods
Does anyone know if I should be able to add an H.225 Gatekeeper controlled trunk to a Route Group? It's not showing up in my RG list in CUCM. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper to Route Group

2011-02-20 Thread ccieforme
It can't be directly associated to a route pattern so check there first. -Original Message- From: Jay Woods cisco...@live.com Sender: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 16:54:53 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper to Route

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper to Route Group

2011-02-20 Thread bkvalent...@gmail.com
If you have a route pattern pointed directly to a trunk, you are not able to add it to an RG. Vice Versa is also true. Brian - Reply message - From: Jay Woods cisco...@live.com Date: Sun, Feb 20, 2011 5:54 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper to Route Group To:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper to Route Group

2011-02-20 Thread Ki Wi
Is it used somewhere by the route pattern? Sent from my iPhone Pls pardon my fat fingers. On Feb 21, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Jay Woods cisco...@live.com wrote: Does anyone know if I should be able to add an H.225 Gatekeeper controlled trunk to a Route Group? It's not showing up in my RG list in

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper to Route Group

2011-02-20 Thread ccieid1ot
Yes, make sure RP is using it. duy ccie #27737 voice tmobile g2 On Feb 20, 2011 6:03 PM, Jay Woods cisco...@live.com wrote: Does anyone know if I should be able to add an H.225 Gatekeeper controlled trunk to a Route Group? It's not showing up in my RG list in CUCM.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper to Route Group

2011-02-20 Thread Jay Woods
That's exactly what the problem was, thank you so much! To: cisco...@live.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com From: bkvalent...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper to Route Group Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:37:55 -0500 If you have a route pattern pointed directly to a