[OSL | CCIE_Voice] RE : BUG ????? QoS with MLP LFI

and imagine a similar question during the lab and Proctor reboots your routers before testing your config. you gonna get a zero not only for the QoS question because the branch router will not be accessible anymore I tried with different ios but what I know is that during the lab they shou

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BUG ????? QoS with MLP LFI

I saw the same multiple times. Checked all configs with R&S CCIE sitting near, but nothing helped. Probably it’s just IOS issue. ☹ -- Best regards, Ilya Rubinchik Chief UC Engineer Mars Solutions Ltd. Skype: im_citius Mob: +998 (97) 712-8456 Office: +998 (71) 290-7364 From: ccie_voice-boun...@

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab3 Task2.4 dialing globalized number from missed calls directory

Gregg, If you want this call flow to work: IP phone 1 > TP > IP phone 2 You need to make sure that IP phone 1 has access to the TP and that the TP has access to IP phone 2, however, you must be certain that IP phone 1 does not have access to IP phone 2. - Pablo Meneses. On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab3 Task2.4 dialing globalized number from missed calls directory

Pablo, Thanks for the reply. There is no route pattern involved in this lab. All internal which makes it all the more confusing to me. I made the change to the service parameter you suggested and reset CUCM - no difference. I'm wondering why I see a "*Match Result* = BlockThisPattern" even the

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] voicemail aar issue.

I ran a test with voice mail port with aar. I was able to dial the voicemail port # to get to unity connection system. But i can't dial the voicemail pilot number directly even though the hunt pilot # is configured with aar group and external mask. I think there is a bug with callmanager 7

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Display name on CIPC

Well what I meant was that this is an Expert study "forum". So some effort on your own could be expected before posting a question. You learn more if you try to come up with the solution on your own, than just posting a question. Just my 2 cents ** Sent from my iPhone. Excuse brevity and typog

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab 1 mock lab experience qos buffers

Hi, I did not see the answer to this in the solutions for this question and just want to confirm; in case something else does this automatically: The question asks: For the ingress queues on the HQ-3750 switch, the buffers need to divided equally. After running, auto qos voip cisco-phone on th

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BUG ????? QoS with MLP LFI

Can you post your configs after reboot? duy ccie #27737 voice tmobile g2 On Feb 21, 2011 10:24 AM, "Friderich Claude" wrote: > Hello Guys, > > Does anybody already encountered the problem with Virtual access ?? > > Let me explain . > > As I configure qos with MLP LFI between hq and br2 every

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BUG ????? QoS with MLP LFI

Please send appropriate parts of the configuration from the GW's. ** Sent from my iPhone. Excuse brevity and typographical errors. ** 21 feb 2011 kl. 17:26 skrev "ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com" mailto:ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.co

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BUG ????? QoS with MLP LFI

I’ve seen this a few times also. In the OWLE class, Vik mentioned that this is a known bug that shows up sometimes on their pod HQ routers because they are running a slightly older IOS (in order to allow the Gatekeeper feature to run without purchasing a feature license). Not sure which specific

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BUG ????? QoS with MLP LFI

Claude, I've seen this happen. What I'd recommend: sh run (to keep old config) no frame-relay interface-dlci X (to remove all fr config) shut interface (to remove DLCIs learned from the FR switch) frame-relay interface-dlci X no shut auto qos ... then, check show ppp multilink ... to verify if m

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] BUG ????? QoS with MLP LFI

Hello Guys, Does anybody already encountered the problem with Virtual access ?? Let me explain . As I configure qos with MLP LFI between hq and br2 everything was working fine !!! After rebooting, no serial access anymore between hq and br2. With show ip interface brief I hav

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Display name on CIPC

He probably just likes to hear people talk down to him. Maybe that's why he asked the question in a educational forum. Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos. On Feb 21, 2011, at 5:09 AM, Roger Källberg wrote: > Yes you can use the + in EPNM, if that's what you meant? > > As a side no

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Display name on CIPC

Hi Roger, Thanks for the info. What I meant is the external mask.I tried directly on the line in the external number mask but it doesn't accept + sign even with \ escape character. Regards. Khaled From: roger.kallb...@cygate.se To: khaled_sah...@hotmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.c

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Display name on CIPC

If you meant for incoming calls, then no it's not supported on a CIPC. To display + on a hard phone like, 7965 you need to globalize the incoming calling party number on the VGW in CUCM. There are 4 fields for this on each VGW entity. If it's a MGCP GW, remember to do a no mgcp/mgcp in IOS to ge

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Display name on CIPC

Yes you can use the + in EPNM, if that's what you meant? As a side note, why don't you just try and see what happens? ** Sent from my iPhone. Excuse brevity and typographical errors. ** 21 feb 2011 kl. 09:53 skrev "khaled Saholy" mailto:khaled_sah...@hotmail.com>>: I mean how can we display

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Display name on CIPC

I mean how can we display the plus sign on Cisco IP Phones? Regards. Khaled From: khaled_sah...@hotmail.com To: roger.kallb...@cygate.se; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:31:53 +0300 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Display name on CIPC Is the + sign supported