[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME: + display for POTS dial-peer calls

2011-06-26 Thread Adil Shaikh
Hi Guys, run into a know issue of displaying + on H323/CME phone. the call is coming on POTS dial-peer on CME phone. Telco is sending + in the ANI but phone is not displaying it. Phone is 7965. Display i = 'HQ PH2' Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '+12123945002'

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FRF.12 question

2011-06-26 Thread Roger Carpio
Well you might want to check what happened to that interface. Run the show traffic-shape; if it looks fine to you, then leave it like that :) http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/qos/command/reference/qrfcmd11.html#wp1019473 Regards, Roger Carpio. On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Cristobal P

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Urgent priority check

2011-06-26 Thread Roger Carpio
I agree with Randall, if you hit # the call will match 9011!# right away, no need to use urgent priority. On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Randall Saborio wrote: > Still. I just tried it on my lab with patterns: > 9011! > 9011!# > > And 9011# routed immediately without using "urgent priority". T

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] FRF.12 question

2011-06-26 Thread Cristobal Priego
hello all when you configure FRF.12 manually on your seial interfaces on HQ and BR2 on the HQ router where the same physical interface is used to connect BR1 and BR2, BR1 link isn't affected at all because traffic shaping isn't enabled on the physical interface, correct ? so i can pretty much ign

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Urgent priority check

2011-06-26 Thread Randall Saborio
Still. I just tried it on my lab with patterns: 9011! 9011!# And 9011# routed immediately without using "urgent priority". That is because ! excludes # as a digit. From the help, it says: "The exclamation point (!) wildcard matches one or more digits in the range 0 through 9.". On Sun, Jun 26, 20

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPM getting invalid device

2011-06-26 Thread Cristobal Priego
does yourapp user matches the user in CUPS ? is ip phone messenger on in CUPS? do you have the CTI enabled and the CTI controll all devices group associated to your app user ? 2011/6/26 Alan Gardner > "Invalid Device > > You were trying to access IP Phone Messenger service from a device no

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Urgent priority check

2011-06-26 Thread Victor Malyuga
I said international pattern ending with #   try 9011! and 9011!# without urgent priority. You will have to wait for interdigit timeout for 9011# --- On Sun, 26/6/11, Randall Saborio wrote: From: Randall Saborio Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Urgent priority check To: "Victor Malyuga" Cc: c

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Urgent priority check

2011-06-26 Thread Randall Saborio
I disagree, it is not needed for pattern ending in #. Usually it is for patterns starting in \+ AND ending in ! and 9911 as exception. A few more special cases maybe. On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Victor Malyuga wrote: > international pattern ending with # sign. > > --- On *Sun, 26/6/11, do

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPM getting invalid device

2011-06-26 Thread Alan Gardner
"Invalid Device You were trying to access IP Phone Messenger service from a device not provisioned on Cisco CallManager server. Please work with your system administrator to get this device configured." I am running CUCM 7 and CUPS 7 and I have completed the following steps: 1. Configured IP Ph

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Challenges with Hardware VPN

2011-06-26 Thread Pithog Oil
Hi Experts, i use the Software VPN in the past but now i use the hardware VPN and am having lots of challenges i have never seen with software VPN , can someone help me out, how do i get my phones to register with the Firmware on them without a firmware upgrade, my PSTN phone keeps registering a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Urgent priority check

2011-06-26 Thread Victor Malyuga
international  pattern ending with # sign. --- On Sun, 26/6/11, donny f wrote: From: donny f Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Urgent priority check To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Sunday, 26 June, 2011, 16:08 hi all,   for Route Pattern in lab.   when we need to check  "urgent priority"

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Urgent priority check

2011-06-26 Thread None Ya
It all depends on the requirements of the questions you are asked. Urgent priority: If not asked, I would not configure it.For AAR to work, you will need to consider the dial plan that you created in CUCM, since you may have conflicting patterns that would negatively impact AAR, and address it

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Possible to get repeated lab question?

2011-06-26 Thread Ki Wi
Just wondering ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Urgent priority check

2011-06-26 Thread donny f
hi all, for Route Pattern in lab. when we need to check "urgent priority". I only use for 911 and 9911. do we need to use for AAR RP : \+.1 or other Route Pattern ? what is the best practice tks ___ For more information regarding industry leadi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA calling name

2011-06-26 Thread Victor Malyuga
I have RDP with display name configured. However the calling name is displayed only after the call is connected.   Does it display the calling name in ringing state in your setup?   I tried with h323 and mgcp gateways with the same result.  --- On Sat, 25/6/11, Cristobal Priego wrote: From: