Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA functionality

2013-03-29 Thread Pixar Perfect
And where do you plan to invoke the script and vxml function? Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:51:10 +0300 From: aboaz...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA functionality Hello Friends... I have the following setup, I am not sure if the will be suitable to

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA functionality

2013-03-29 Thread Jamie Parr (jamparr)
So basically no. You need a gateway to host the vxml script Sent from my iPhone On 29 Mar 2013, at 07:16, Pixar Perfect pixarperf...@live.commailto:pixarperf...@live.com wrote: And where do you plan to invoke the script and vxml function? Date: Wed, 27 Mar

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH Music On Hold source from local router issue

2013-03-29 Thread Suresh Bhandari
Check by removing all extra configs except the ccm-manager music-on-hold, and call-manager-fallback moh music-on-hold.au multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 142.1.65.254 142.102.65.254 Try to make a call to any pstn side from your SB phone and put on hold. It works. I just finished it in

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA functionality

2013-03-29 Thread Ahmad Taamneh
The gateway on the other cluster is mgcp, does it help Sent from my iPhone On Mar 29, 2013, at 10:16 AM, Pixar Perfect pixarperf...@live.com wrote: And where do you plan to invoke the script and vxml function? Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:51:10 +0300 From: aboaz...@gmail.com To:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MVA functionality

2013-03-29 Thread William Bell
Not really. MGCP is unable to load the VXML application because the Q931 is back hauled. If the ingress gateway was H323 then it could actually service more than one UCM cluster. Obviously, network (security/QoS) considerations must be taken into account. You could also put a H323 GW local

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Voicemail Ports on SA

2013-03-29 Thread Steve Keller
Message notification would be another place where the vm ports external number mask would come into play. On Mar 28, 2013 7:35 PM, Steve Keller skeller...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Bill. All of that makes perfect sense. I was just curious if there were something I was not considering about this.