Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call Forward Unregistered

2010-10-18 Thread sisiaji
hey guys, i truly have no clue what you are talking about :))) what VM has to do with CFUR? For and By fields are representing what you have configured as redirecting Calling Party number mask (in this case redirecting ip phone) and what you have configured as a destination for such calls

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE IP address next to Loopback - how?

2010-10-12 Thread sisiaji
Hello all, I am trying to make CUE to use ip address which is next to Loopback. I.e interface Loopback 0 ip address 10.1.10.254 255.255.255.255 and I want CUE to be 10.1.10.253 ? i am getting CME(config)#int serv 2/0 CME(config-if)#ip unnumbered loop0 CME(config-if)#service-module ip address

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco 3750 QoS

2010-10-12 Thread sisiaji
yep, but what if the requirement would be to limit priority queue??? how can you do that? or that would be wrong requirement? and btw, you have to put some value in share as with zero it will not work so it should be srr-queue bandwidth shape 10 0 0 0 srr-queue bandwidth share *1* 40 30 30

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RES: +Dialing to Site C without Gatekeeper

2010-10-02 Thread sisiaji
yeah, the same here... my PSTN phone is on CME 3.3 and that one shows all correctly (both up and down with + sign) while the one which is on CME 7.0.1 on site C doesn't show it in top part just at the bottom. so it is specific to CME version and as others mentioned, I guess it is ok. t, Steph On

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Adding Subscriber on VMware

2010-10-02 Thread sisiaji
great recap Munish! I would just add one very important point for snapshots - if you want to avoid future problems with DB replication and NTP, you ensure that initial snapshots are taken while both PUB/SUB are shutdown. Rgds, S. On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:28 AM, xmun...@gmail.com wrote: Follow

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS solution required.

2010-10-01 Thread sisiaji
well, that is why we have this group for - to help each other and test our config and knowledge before the real test. so gang, for WAN, when you need MLP, just go to subinterface, enter bandwidth and go to DLCI and type: auto qos voip [trust] fr-atm (trust is optional, if nothing else is

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Single Number Reach

2010-10-01 Thread sisiaji
calling party transformation is done without prefix \ On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote: The crazy thing is I tried this but I couldn't get it to work. PT_HQ_CALLING_OUT assigned to CSS_HQ_CALLING_OUT assigned to CALLING Number Transform on the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Single Number Reach

2010-10-01 Thread sisiaji
Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote: When doing it under Call Routing Transformation Pattern Calling Party Transformation you have to use \+ When doing it on the Calling Party transform mask on a Route Pattern or Route List you don't use \ On Oct 1, 2010, at 10:44 AM, sisiaji wrote

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS solution required.

2010-10-01 Thread sisiaji
: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ashar Siddiqui Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 10:57 AM To: sisiaji Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS solution required. Yeah it is but if you have tested some