orking like that before. But
for some reasons, it wasn't working for me a couple of days ago.
Same configuration. I guess i'll try it again and see if it will
work for me next time. Thanks.
JD
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:11:13 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
since i had it working like that before. But
for some reasons, it wasn't working for me a couple of days ago.
Same configuration. I guess i'll try it again and see if it will
work for me next time. Thanks.
JD
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:11:13 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [E
14:11:13 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK with Tech-Prefix
> CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
> Yes you can route via GK with just using different tech prefixes WITHOUT
> using zone prefixes
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 a
Yeah i thought so too since i had it working like that before. But for some
reasons, it wasn't working for me a couple of days ago. Same configuration. I
guess i'll try it again and see if it will work for me next time. Thanks.
JD
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:11:13 -0500From: [EMAIL PROTECT
Yes you can route via GK with just using different tech prefixes WITHOUT
using zone prefixes
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Devildoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Perhaps too much studying has scrambled my brains, but i swear that in the
> past i have gotten gk to work correctly with
Hello,
Perhaps too much studying has scrambled my brains, but i swear that in the past
i have gotten gk to work correctly with just tech prefix alone and no zone
prefix. So my question is this... can gk work correctly alone on just tech
prefix? Or does the gk also need a zone prefix in addi