Another way to do this is on the gatekeeper configure:
no zone subnet ZONE default enable
zone subnet ZONE
enable
this will prevent gateways from registering to GK automatically and only
allow gateways on the subnet which you have specified, to register to GK
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:52 AM,
You also do not need the h323-gateway voip interface command. This command is
not required for a gw to register as an h323 gw but one of the commands needed
if you are registering it to a gatekeeper
Randall
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 30, 2011, at 7:22 AM, Gurpreet Singh Kukreja
wrote:
> Hi
Hi Ken,
On the BR1 router, enter command, "no gateway" and see if that helps.
Regards
Gurpreet
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Ken Wyan wrote:
> I have this scenario.
>
> I want to register BR1 router as h323 gateway to CUCM. In addition HQ
> Router is configured as a Gatekeeper as well , bu
I have this scenario.
I want to register BR1 router as h323 gateway to CUCM. In addition HQ
Router is configured as a Gatekeeper as well , but I don't want BR1 gateway
to register with GK.
For that I configure below (on BR1 Router)
int xxx
h323-gateway voip interface
h323-gateway voip bind srcad
hrini)
5. Re: h323 gw question (Shrini)
6. Re: transfer file to router with no tftp or ftp server (Shrini)
--
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 13:00:57 +0800
From: "=?gbk?B?YnJ1bm8=?="
To: "=?gbk?B?Q0NJRS1W08q8/s
nd CUPS 8.6 NTP issue (Shrini)
> 4. Re: CUCM and UCCX - JTAPI issue (Shrini)
> 5. Re: h323 gw question (Shrini)
> 6. Re: transfer file to router with no tftp or ftp server (Shrini)
>
>
> ------
>
> Message:
Matching default voip dial-peer 0 for inbound voip can also work fine
but it has VAD enabled by default and can choose any codec which can
cause issues.
Specifying specific inbound dial-peer like 3000 will force no vad and
choose codec defined in voice class as we are forcing to match these
using t
In my opinion it is not required. I never used unless I am using it for MVA.
On 11/5/2011 10:00 PM, bruno wrote:
hello guys,
regarding the h323 gw , why we need incoming called-number . under
dial-peer ? i saw vik create another dial-peer for match any inbound .
dial-peer voice 3000 voip
de
This is to match inbound call coming from CUCM. Dial-peer 3000 voip
will be used to matched inbound voip calls as well as outbound voip
calls.
Inbound in terms to call coming from cucm to h323 GW and outbound in
terms of call coming from PSTN/GW to CUCM for inbound phone calls.
2011/11/6 bruno
hello guys,
regarding the h323 gw , why we need incoming called-number . under dial-peer ?
i saw vik create another dial-peer for match any inbound .
dial-peer voice 3000 voip
destination-pattern ^3...$
voice-class codec 1
voice-class h323 1
session target ipv4:192.168.10.211
incomi
Do you see the ip address above the "name" field, which is the ip
address for the gw? If not you need to reset the gw in call manager.
Just a thought off the top of my head
Randall
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 12, 2010, at 8:42 AM, "ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com"
wrote:
> Send CCIE_
t.com/communities> and our
public website at www.ipexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/>
From: "CCIETalk.com"
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 12:03:53 -0400
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW and E164 Numbers
This might be a stupid question or I might be tired but
This might be a stupid question or I might be tired but something aint
right.
I am sending unknown type local numbers (7 digits) from pstn to my h323 gw @
BR2. calling number on the phone shows up as 7digit and same shows up in
missed calls directory.
On my GW settings under CUCM, i have the appr
Any suggestions on this please ? Wanted to know how to decide the VM pilot
number ?
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:48 PM, kill mill wrote:
> Guys had a quick question on this. When we use the CTI RP workaround I
> see you guys send the call to some known number for example 1641 but how do
> you kn
Guys had a quick question on this. When we use the CTI RP workaround I see
you guys send the call to some known number for example 1641 but how do you
know this is one of the DID/'s that route to the main site ? If in the exam
the VM pilot 2220 then do you guys just pick an arbitary number and hop
>
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Jose Gregorio
> Linero (jlinero)
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 04, 2009 11:50 AM
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW con
: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW configuration
Hi all,
I am wondering if MTP is a best practice to have it checked in the H323 GW
configuration, or if it is a must.
Appreciate any comments.
Regards,
Jose
Hi all,
I am wondering if MTP is a best practice to have it checked in the H323 GW
configuration, or if it is a must.
Appreciate any comments.
Regards,
Jose
position to know far more than me
about this. It's okay to try itbut be ready with plan "b".
Cliff
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Hennrich"
To: "Wesley Lim"
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW
this. It's okay to try itbut be ready with plan "b".
Cliff
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Hennrich"
To: "Wesley Lim"
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection
Hi,
<mailto:cpar...@cparker.us>] Sent: Sábado, Marzo 21, 2009 1:48 PM
To: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero)
Cc: Cliff McGlamry; Wesley Lim; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
<mailto:ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SR
ábado, Marzo 21, 2009 1:48 PM
To: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero)
Cc: Cliff McGlamry; Wesley Lim; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection
Here you go ... I do see the FF thing you were pointing out before
Pod15-BR1-RTR#debug isdn
; Wesley Lim; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection
Here you go ... I do see the FF thing you were pointing out before
Pod15-BR1-RTR#debug isdn q931
debug isdn q931 is ON.
Pod15-BR1-RTR#
*Mar 21 19:53:05.367: ISDN Se0/0/0:23
to see if this version is affected by
the bug.
Regards,
Jose
-Original Message-
From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us]
Sent: Sábado, Marzo 21, 2009 1:31 PM
To: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero)
Cc: Cliff McGlamry; Wesley Lim; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323
McGlamry; Wesley Lim; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection
Thing that puzzles me too is if you use the CTI route point, the
redirect that Unity sees would actually occur there and the redir number
should be 200X due to the vm
nt: Sábado, Marzo 21, 2009 12:56 PM
To: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero)
Cc: Cliff McGlamry; Wesley Lim; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection
I have indeed tested this and I understand the why H323 vs MGCP makes a
difference. I
al Message-
From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us]
Sent: Sábado, Marzo 21, 2009 1:31 PM
To: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero)
Cc: Cliff McGlamry; Wesley Lim; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection
Just tried it H323 only and it
ailto:cpar...@cparker.us]
Sent: Sábado, Marzo 21, 2009 12:56 PM
To: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero)
Cc: Cliff McGlamry; Wesley Lim; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection
I have indeed tested this and I understand the why H323 vs MG
Glamry; Wesley Lim; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection
I think you can get around this if you don't use the alias command.
Heres the way I usually do SRST VM:
voicemail 912122251600
call-forward busy 91212225169.
call-forw
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection
I have indeed tested this and I understand the why H323 vs MGCP makes a
difference. I trying to understand why the redirect would even matter
since we arent relying in the presence of the redir number to
of the VM in SRST mode because we are sending the redirecting number
with the wrong reason.
Regards,
Jose
*From:* Cliff McGlamry [mailto:cl...@mcglamry.net]
*Sent:* Sábado, Marzo 21, 2009 11:46 AM
*To:* Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero); Wesley Lim
*Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
*Subject:* Re:
y in
SiteB, it is a H323 GW in Site B.
Regards,
Jose
-Original Message-
From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us]
Sent: Sábado, Marzo 21, 2009 12:25 PM
To: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero)
Cc: Cliff McGlamry; Wesley Lim; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H3
Agreealias is the wrong way to go to get this to VM.
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Parker"
To: "Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero)"
Cc: "Cliff McGlamry" ; "Wesley Lim"
;
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CC
irecting number
with the wrong reason.
Regards,
Jose
*From:* Cliff McGlamry [mailto:cl...@mcglamry.net]
*Sent:* Sábado, Marzo 21, 2009 11:46 AM
*To:* Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero); Wesley Lim
*Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
*Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voic
e Gregorio Linero (jlinero)
To: Wesley Lim
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection
Hi all:
I am stuck on this, any thoughts?, points of view?, have anybody faced t
om
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection
Hi:
Actually I have tested the TP and CTI RP method when the BR1 GW is MGCP and
it works fine, the problem I have is when the BR1 GW is H323, due to the
fact that you need the command isdn outgoing ie redirect t
From: Wesley Lim [mailto:lim.wes...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sábado, Marzo 21, 2009 2:11 AM
To: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero)
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection
2 other methods besides vm-integration:
1. Translation
2 other methods besides vm-integration:
1. Translation pattern
2. CTI RP
This topic have been discussed many times, would suggest you to search for
the alternative methods.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) <
jlin...@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hi:
>
>
>
> Looks like I’v
Hi:
Looks like I've never tested this before, I have configured BR1 GW as H323
GW, I am aware of the 0xFF redirect problem and I am testing AAR and SRST,
due to the fact this is an H323 GW I need the command "isdn outgoing ie
redirect" in the ISDN serial interface in order to make the redirecti
CCIE Voice Lab Exam
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW PSTN -> BR1 call.
Hi all,
I tested PSTN call to BR1 phone and the call was disconnected right
away.
But after I added below config, the call went through.
Interface loop0
H323-gateway voip interface
H323-gate
Hi all,
I tested PSTN call to BR1 phone and the call was disconnected right
away.
But after I added below config, the call went through.
Interface loop0
H323-gateway voip interface
H323-gateway voip bind srcaddr ip-addr
Is this normal?
The problem is if I conf
41 matches
Mail list logo
