Hi all
I going crazy trying to figure out this issue. I use a Hardware VPN to connect
to PL
with 7960 and 7961 phones. I am doing LAB 10A part 10.1 RSVP call agent.
I have BR1 to HQ set to Manadtory under the Locations in CUCM and have all the
DP settings and MRG and MRGL's as per the PG guide
Hi all:
For two g729 calls, how much band would you set at ip rsvp bandwith
These are the two options:
1: ip rsvp bandwith 64 (40 + 24)
or
2: ip rsvp bandwitn 80 (40 + 40)
The first one looks find becouse once the call is completed the rsvp bandwith
is reduced to 24 and a
ject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP RSVP
To:
Hi all
I going crazy trying to figure out this issue. I use a Hardware VPN to connect
to PL
with 7960 and 7961 phones. I am doing LAB 10A part 10.1 RSVP call agent.
I have BR1 to HQ set to Manadtory under the Locations in CUCM and have all the
DP settings a
Larry,
I'm in the same boat. Did you ever figure out why RSVP is broken?
I have a home lab and I don't know how to see if the RSVP agent on IOS is
working. I have a feeling there is something going on with
versions/features. From the SRND:
The Cisco RSVP Agent feature requires Cisco IOS Relea
I have also had major issues several times as well after applying MLP LFI
when RSVP was already implemented. Last time I tried, I got RSVP working
well on PL but after applying MLP LFI on the next question I would also get
the "not enough bandwidth" message. You might think it is an RSVP issue if
You are right, in my case the RSVP bandwidth remained on the actual interface
and not on the virtual template. Once I moved it to the virtual on both sides I
was good.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 28, 2010, at 4:43 AM, Ronmac wrote:
> Hi,
> I think the ip rsvp bandwidth command is not moved to
Hi Angel
By reading the SRND It does not seem that it is the matter of the first call
being 40 Kbps and the second call as 24Kbps. It states that the endpoints
will always request (g729 case) 40Kbps before capabilities exchange and
after capabilities exchange, "in most cases" the revised bandwid
bps
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Angel Perez
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 9:16 PM
To: osl osl
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ip rsvp bandwith
Hi all:
For two g729 calls, how much band would you set at ip rsvp bandw
Thanks
From: r.ochi...@mfient.com
To: gorr...@hotmail.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ip rsvp bandwith
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 08:18:55 +0300
From SRND
Configuration Recommendation
Because the initial reservation will be larger than the actual
Hello experts.
I am experiencing a quite annoying problem here on my Lab. After I
configure everything and start testing, I see my HQ and BR1 phones are
always sending to AAR (Network Congestion. Retouting) on the first call.
I am adding "ip rsvp bandwidth" on the serial interface and "ip rsvp
b
Does deb ip rsvp sign show anything?
Does deb sccp events show anything? (there will be a keep alive - anything
besides this?)
Normal problems with RSVP
1. the CODEC within the dspfarm is not g729r8
2. the IOS Enhanced MTP is not in the appropriate DPool.
3. the MRGL>MRG>MTP is incorrect or has
Vic has some examples where he indicates to allow 4 G729s call thru rsvp to use
"ip rsvp 160", yet the SRND "shows ip rsvp 112"
I can see if you want ring-in on 4 G.729 calls you would need 160. But 3 G.729
calls connected and then 1 ring-in would be 112.
If I asked you to allow 4 calls in wou
112 is the right answer not 160z
--
Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890
Managing Partner / Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
On Jun 9, 2012, at 14:16, "Jason Aarons (AM)"
wrote:
> Vic has some examples where he indicates to al
13 matches
Mail list logo
