Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Preferences for hunting past failed PSTN on H.323 GW

2012-08-06 Thread Jason Aarons (AM)
: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 1:26 AM To: Online Study Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Preferences for hunting past failed PSTN on H.323 GW I wanted to query the group to find out if there is a preferred method for handling high availability with H.323 gateways. Specifically, call failover when the PRI

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL|CCIE_Voice] Preferences for hunting past failed PSTN on H.323 GW

2012-08-03 Thread Justin McIntyre
So ultimately I believe your assumption is correct. If you were routing from one gateway to another and you receive a legitimate un-allocated number response , then under most circumstances you would absolutely want to stop routing, after all, the number is un-allocated why badger it to death

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Preferences for hunting past failed PSTN on H.323 GW

2012-08-01 Thread Jason Aarons (AM)
and it's a viable alternative, just not widely used. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of William Bell Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 1:26 AM To: Online Study Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Preferences for hunting past failed PSTN

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Preferences for hunting past failed PSTN on H.323 GW

2012-07-30 Thread William Bell
I wanted to query the group to find out if there is a preferred method for handling high availability with H.323 gateways. Specifically, call failover when the PRI on the H.323 gateway is down (or simulated down, as the case may be). In the solution guides for the ipExpert labs I see that they