: Sunday, March 03, 2013 1:45 PM
To: Sears, Michael (msears)
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; networksanitytoinsan...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Queries in relation to Route Plan
Hello Michael,
quick question about this if you do not mind.
1) On site B I am doing the digit strip
Hello Michael,
quick question about this if you do not mind.
1) On site B I am doing the digit strip on the CUCM and not the gateway is
the right way to get this done ?
Everyone develops their own strategy for where they perform the digit
strip. My strategy is to use predot on the dial-pattern so
1) On site B I am doing the digit strip on the CUCM and not the gateway is the
right way to get this done ?
Everyone develops their own strategy for where they perform the digit strip.
My strategy is to use predot on the dial-pattern so that the 9, 91 and 9011 is
striped from the phone display
Sorry but you only said you were doing the patterns for site b using the SLRG.
You did not mention the requirement to use the same RP for both an MGCP and
H323 GW
I was considering that you were creating separate dial peers for each site
using that sites SLRG.
1) SLRG are more difficult to ma
hi Bill,
Thanks for your reply.
However with this method using *local route groups* for HQ( MgcP gateway )
and Site B ( h323 gateway) with the same route patterns will not be
possible .
1) Currently I have the HQ and Site B using local route groups . Local
route groups will not work in case
My preference is to do as much as possible in the h323 gateway instead of on
CUCM but there is no right way as long as you meet the requirements of the
task. Remember you have to meet the demands of calling and caller info in SRST
as well.
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 2, 2013, at 11:47 PM, sanity
Hello All,
I have route patterns set as the following on the CUCM ( callmanger)
for my site B ( h323 gateway) for emergency , local , long dist and
International as the following
911 > local route group
9.[2-9]XX---> local route group ( strip predot)
91.[2-9]XX[2-9]X
