victor_maly...@yahoo.comwrote:
I wonder how we can get 38% if it is only 1 task. It can be 0 or 100.
There is no partial mark - we were told!
--- On *Wed, 8/6/11, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com* wrote:
From: Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX grading
did you need a xcoder for branches to access the route points?
From: ccieid1ot ccieid...@gmail.com
To: Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Thu, June 9, 2011 10:48:42 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX grading
Were
I wonder how we can get 38% if it is only 1 task. It can be 0 or 100. There is
no partial mark - we were told!
--- On Wed, 8/6/11, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX grading
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date
victor_maly...@yahoo.comwrote:
I wonder how we can get 38% if it is only 1 task. It can be 0 or 100. There
is no partial mark - we were told!
--- On *Wed, 8/6/11, Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com* wrote:
From: Michael Luo hout...@gmail.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX grading
I got 38% on UCCX, which I didn't expect.
I tested made test calls to verify the workflow. What could be the possible
traps / tricks that cause loss of points?
Thanks!
Michael
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
