t;>> you to the same decision point regardless “outvia configured for destination
>>> zone?”
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This might answer your second question also in a later post.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Nara Shikamaru
;> mciarfe...@iplogic.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yes. Except the last statement. CUBE is doing…….. Codec conversion. The
>> GK has nothing to do with codec negotiation.
>>
>> And there is only one GK.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *
: ABIOLA ADEFILA [adefilabi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:34 PM
To: Michael Ciarfello
Cc: Nara Shikamaru; OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Mod 1 Q 4.2 - CUBE and Gatekeepers
Talking about the vol2 lab 1 question on CUBE, gatekeeper and branch 2
i have configured all
;
> And there is only one GK.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Nara Shikamaru [mailto:shikam...@kagadis.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2009 11:20 AM
>
>
> *To:* Michael Ciarfello
> *Cc:* OSL Group
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Mod 1 Q 4.2 - CUBE and Gatekeepe
eptember 16, 2009 11:20 AM
To: Michael Ciarfello
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Mod 1 Q 4.2 - CUBE and Gatekeepers
Okay, I think understand the logic better now. The gatekeepers are used to
centralize the dial plans and the SBC is used to demarc sites (summarizing).
and can share their design and reasons for using it.
>
>
> ----------------------
>
> *From:* Nara Shikamaru [shikam...@kagadis.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2009 1:55 AM
> *To:* Michael Ciarfello
> *Cc:* OSL Group
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Mo
that in real, maybe can share why ? Because our team just new to this
tech, and need to review whether Cisco or Acme.
Thks in advance
--- On Wed, 9/16/09, Michael Ciarfello wrote:
From: Michael Ciarfello
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Mod 1 Q 4.2 - CUBE and Gatekeepers
To: "
nothing to do with codec negotiation.
>
> And there is only one GK.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Nara Shikamaru [mailto:shikam...@kagadis.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2009 11:20 AM
>
> *To:* Michael Ciarfello
> *Cc:* OSL Group
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CC
: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Mod 1 Q 4.2 - CUBE and Gatekeepers
Okay, I think understand the logic better now. The gatekeepers are used to
centralize the dial plans and the SBC is used to demarc sites (summarizing).
In the context of the V2 L1 question, each site is using gatekeepers to keep
the
ng of how it could be used. Maybe someone has used it in real
> life and can share their design and reasons for using it.
>
> --
> *From:* Nara Shikamaru [shikam...@kagadis.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2009 1:55 AM
> *To:* Michael Ciarfello
com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 1:55 AM
To: Michael Ciarfello
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Mod 1 Q 4.2 - CUBE and Gatekeepers
Volume 2 Lab 1 uses CUBE in conjunction with Gatekeepers, which is confusing.
Okay, I kind understand that mechanically CUBE works the
studylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru [
> shikam...@kagadis.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 15, 2009 4:40 PM
> *To:* OSL Group
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Mod 1 Q 4.2 - CUBE and Gatekeepers
>
> My question is not so much about specifics as it is clarity, would l
| CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Mod 1 Q 4.2 - CUBE and Gatekeepers
My question is not so much about specifics as it is clarity, would like to know
your opinion.
I'm working through implementing CUBE/SBC in this question (which I'm new to.)
As a Session Border Controller, the SBC allows the impleme
My question is not so much about specifics as it is clarity, would like to
know your opinion.
I'm working through implementing CUBE/SBC in this question (which I'm new
to.) As a Session Border Controller, the SBC allows the implementation of
security and conversion of voip traffic between codecs.
14 matches
Mail list logo
