[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 Lab 5 Proctor Guide needs to be reworked

2010-02-22 Thread t n
Hello, I am currently on lab 5. From the beginning, it's already missing a few crucial items. For example, there is no discussion of the partitions/CSS for the phones. Also, the previous lab had the gateways used in the RPs. It's also missing the verifications and explanations seen in the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 Lab 5 Proctor Guide needs to be reworked

2010-02-22 Thread CCIETalk.com
Yeah it has TONS of errors and not for the faint hearted :D On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8:50 AM, t n tnn...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I am currently on lab 5. From the beginning, it's already missing a few crucial items. For example, there is no discussion of the partitions/CSS for the phones.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 Lab 5 Proctor Guide needs to be reworked

2010-02-22 Thread Wayne Lawson
We'll make sure the latest files are uploaded. All of this was updated and fixed. Regards, Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244 Founder President - IPexpert Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 101 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat eFax: +1.810.454.0130

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 Lab 5 Proctor Guide needs to be reworked

2010-02-22 Thread Vik Malhi
at www.ipexpert.com/communities http://www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com . From: t n tnn...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:50:14 -0500 To: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 Lab 5 Proctor

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 Lab 5 Proctor Guide needs to be reworked

2010-02-22 Thread Vik Malhi
://www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com . From: CCIETalk.com cciet...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:10:26 -0500 To: t n tnn...@gmail.com Cc: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 Lab 5 Proctor

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 Lab 5 Proctor Guide needs to be reworked

2010-02-22 Thread Wayne Lawson
cciet...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:10:26 -0500 To: t n tnn...@gmail.com Cc: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 Lab 5 Proctor Guide needs to be reworked Yeah it has TONS of errors and not for the faint hearted :D On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 8

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 Lab 5 Proctor Guide needs to be reworked

2010-02-22 Thread Wilson Bolanos
...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Wayne Lawson Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 9:49 AM To: Vik Malhi Cc: OSL Group Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 Lab 5 Proctor Guide needs to be reworked Vik - I'd like to see this fixed (obviously) if there are errors. Don't feel too bad though - we

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 Lab 5 Proctor Guide needs to be reworked

2010-02-22 Thread t n
*Sent:* Monday, February 22, 2010 9:49 AM *To:* Vik Malhi *Cc:* OSL Group *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 Lab 5 Proctor Guide needs to be reworked Vik - I'd like to see this fixed (obviously) if there are errors. Don't feel too bad though - we can't argue

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 1 Lab 5 Proctor Guide needs to be reworked

2010-02-22 Thread t n
Patrick, I think it's reasonable to expect the PG to be complete and correct. It's that simple. On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Patrick Fischer myciscov...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Guys I really don't understand the rumors out here. I agree with you that a proper versioning might be a good