Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP?

2009-08-31 Thread Andrew Dorsett
I went for my first attempt the end of last week and was the only voice guy in there. They put me off by myself (RTP) and with nobody to bother me it was kinda nice. Sadly I didn't pass, but based on my score report, I was only a couple of points away from passing as I just worked too slow and di

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP?

2009-08-31 Thread Jonathan Charles
Well, I am taking it tomorrow, I will report back on popularity R&S is booked solid thru October 16th tho... apparently more of them are afraid of the refresh than we were... On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Phil G wrote: > I took my first v3-lab attempt in Brussels two weeks ago, i was the o

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP?

2009-08-31 Thread Phil G
I took my first v3-lab attempt in Brussels two weeks ago, i was the only voice-candidate and all tracks in sum we were 8 (with 2 women). Brett Saling wrote: > v3 is not as popular as of yet. I was the only candidate a week ago in > SJ so I made sure the ringer volume was low for the RS folks :)

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP?

2009-08-30 Thread Jonathan Charles
s out... >> > >> > >> > -Original Message----- >> > From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com] >> > Sent: Monday, 31 August 2009 8:01 AM >> > To: Aamir Panjwani >> > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >> > Subject:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP?

2009-08-30 Thread Brett
rett.sal...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, 31 August 2009 9:17 AM > To: Aamir Panjwani > Cc: Jonathan Charles; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP? > > v3 is not as popular as of yet. I was the only candidate a week ago i

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP?

2009-08-30 Thread Jonathan Charles
August 30, 2009 8:13 PM > To: Brett Saling > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP? > > See, I would have made sure it was high for the R&S folks... > > > J > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Brett Sa

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP?

2009-08-30 Thread Michael Ciarfello
t: Sunday, August 30, 2009 8:13 PM To: Brett Saling Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP? See, I would have made sure it was high for the R&S folks... J On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Brett Saling wrote: > v3 is not as p

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP?

2009-08-30 Thread Jonathan Charles
>> From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, 31 August 2009 8:01 AM >> To: Aamir Panjwani >> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP? >> >> Tuesday, v3 attempt 2 >&

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP?

2009-08-30 Thread Jonathan Charles
onathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, 31 August 2009 8:01 AM >> To: Aamir Panjwani >> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP? >> >> Tuesday, v3 attempt 2 >> >> O

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP?

2009-08-30 Thread Aamir Panjwani
z calling party transformation does get confusing... >> >> You are going for the lab soon aren't you?? good luck! >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, 31 August 2009 7:56 A

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP?

2009-08-30 Thread Brett Saling
mpt so > soon, normally it's all booked 90 days out... > > > -Original Message- > From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, 31 August 2009 8:01 AM > To: Aamir Panjwani > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCI

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP?

2009-08-30 Thread Aamir Panjwani
t: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP? Tuesday, v3 attempt 2 On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Aamir Panjwani wrote: > I don't see any other reason than that, in fact I would prefer to do it > on RP as well cuz calling party transformation does get confusing... &

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP?

2009-08-30 Thread Jonathan Charles
#x27;t you?? good luck! > > > > -Original Message- > From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, 31 August 2009 7:56 AM > To: Aamir Panjwani > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP? > >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP?

2009-08-30 Thread Aamir Panjwani
Monday, 31 August 2009 7:56 AM To: Aamir Panjwani Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP? Right, but if all sites are using the same transforms then why not? J On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Aamir Panjwani wrote: > You can't

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP?

2009-08-30 Thread Jonathan Charles
an > Charles > Sent: Sunday, 30 August 2009 3:20 PM > To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP? > > OK, so let's say I have to send 7 digits for local, 10 digits for LD > and stuff the + in for International... &g

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP?

2009-08-30 Thread Aamir Panjwani
ssage- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles Sent: Sunday, 30 August 2009 3:20 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP? OK, so let's say I have

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why not do transformations on the RP?

2009-08-29 Thread Jonathan Charles
OK, so let's say I have to send 7 digits for local, 10 digits for LD and stuff the + in for International... What is stopping me from doing all of my calling party transformations on the Route Pattern for that site? Or are we using the calling party transformation patterns just in case the above