Hi Paola
This looks like a bug in Scala to me. The error message should only be printed
out if the Relative Length Error exceeds 0.03 or the Angle error exceeds 0.5,
whereas in your case both errors are zero. The relevant lines of code are a new
addition in 6.0.2, which explains why you didn't
I believe this is a combination of errors in COMBAT (not setting cell
constraint flags correctly) and SCALA (not detecting properly that
they are unset)
I believe that I have fixed the Scala error in my latest version
ftp://ftp.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/pub/pre/scala_3.2.28.tar.gz
(I hope!)
There
Hi Yuan,
Basically all tRNA structures in pdb will contain pseudo-U, and
starting from old tRNAPhe literature you will find a lot on the
structural consequences of having pseudo-U in RNA.
Poul
On 27/04/2007, at 3.45, Yuan Lin wrote:
Dear All,
I solved a structure of a
Andrew,
Did you try the NCS maps in Coot and it didn't work and therefore
you are going down this rather convoluted route?
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 10:20:12AM +0100, Eleanor Dodson wrote:
Well - I would do it the same way as you are - find a matrix with
lsqkab, then apply that to the map with
An additional fix of Clemens' made in 3.2.29
ftp://ftp.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/scala_3.2.29.tar.gz
Phil
On 27 Apr 2007, at 10:10, Clemens Vonrhein wrote:
Hi Phil,
these diffs I made to 3.2.27 - seem to fix some other things too.
Cheers
Clemens
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 09:50:16AM +0100, Phil
Dear all, please get your applications in for beamtime at BM14 before the
end of next week -i.e. Friday 4th May if you would like beamtime in june or
july and want to solve some structures before the August break - if you want
good phases then get your applications in to us sooner rather than
Such high R values usually mean there are many many very weak relections..
You havent kept in the h+k+l = 2n+1 reflections have you?
Do a native Patterson check too to make sure there are not other
translations which might distort the data
Eleanor
Yi Xue wrote:
Dear all:
I have a
Hello all,
What is the easiest way, these days, to calculate the buried surface area
between two subunits of a protein?
Thanks, and Happy Friday,
Dear *Gloria*
In CNS, you can do it use buried_suface.inp.
On 4/28/07, Gloria Borgstahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
What is the easiest way, these days, to calculate the buried surface area
between two subunits of a protein?
Thanks, and Happy Friday, Gloria
