Re: [ccp4bb] Crystallographic computing platform recommendations?

2008-11-19 Thread Steve Lane
Axel: Um... it works fine for us. I just tested it about 10 seconds ago (names have been changed to protect the guilty): [EMAIL PROTECTED] ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Password: macclient:~ myaccount$ pwd /Network/Servers/osxserverbox.some.domain/afp/myaccount macclient:~ myaccount$ echo $HOME

[ccp4bb] Pymol: Zoom without Mouse

2008-11-19 Thread Raji Edayathumangalam
How does one zoom into the molecule in Pymol without a mouse and with just the Mac trackpad and keyboard? Have tried to look it up in the manual and on the web. No success finding it yet; I did figure it out once before but can't redo it now for the life of me. Need to know how to do it

Re: [ccp4bb] Pymol: Zoom without Mouse

2008-11-19 Thread Smith, Clyde
move z, [number] (where [number] is (of course) a number) will do it but you have to be careful about clipping. There may well also be a zoom command ... -Original Message- From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Raji Edayathumangalam Sent: Wed 19/11/2008 9:29 AM To:

Re: [ccp4bb] difficult MR in R32(H32)

2008-11-19 Thread Shane Atwell
Thanks Eleanor and everyone else that replied privately. Twinning was a common thought and the data was not by several tests. The MR was solved by getting better data, clean 2.8A vs. the 3.0A I had. With this data phaser was able to solve it easily in R32 with 3 molecules. There was not

Re: [ccp4bb] NMR resolution (delete if you believe that ccp4bb is limited to CCP4 and maybe few other crystallography-related topics)

2008-11-19 Thread Ed Pozharski
Thanks to all who answered (so quickly). To summarize, the premise fails because NMR/FRET and crystallography are based on different phenomena, and the energy-distance relationship is only valid for the latter. One has to wonder why they need to build bigger and bigger accelerators instead of

[ccp4bb] Order of scale/merge and reindexing

2008-11-19 Thread Young-Tae Lee
Hi, I have been working on the 2A data. Though almost done, R/Rfree was around 0.20/0.27. Then I noticed that structural factors were reindexed from P222 to P212121 after scaling/merging in the early process (I am finishing up a little bit old data). To escape any problems from wrong