Interesting that these questionaire responses are very different from
the numbers obained from looking at downloads counts for other cross-platform
crystallography software. I wonder if they are more reflective of the currently
available ARP-wARP platforms and perhaps the role of administrator-
pr
Since Sacha is having trouble posting directly the list I will
forward his latest message since It addresses my second set of
questions:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Alexandre OURJOUMTSEV
Thank you, Richard, for your questions !
Unfortunately, I failed to pass my mail to the CCP4bb - I
Hi Alphar,
A while ago I had success with a poor MIR map by building in a few
fragments I could identify and then combining phases from this model
with the MIR phases using SIGMAA (CCP4 program) and then calculating
new maps. A couple of cycles of this resulted in phases in which I had
con
Thanks, Ezra!
I have a native dataset.
I'll try what you said, Hope it works in my case.
Thanks!
Alphar
2009/2/21 Ezra Peisach
> Personally, I would try to build into what you see and then do phase
> recombination. I had a SeMet crystal in which I could only see part of a
> sheet and helix
Thanks, Poul!
How could I change the scale of the data intensities by a factor 2-3? Do I
need to change it in scaleit or to change it in mlphare?
Is that always necessary to make the occupancy of the major site to become
~1? I'll try this.
I use phenix to detect the twin effect, the results turned
Hi alphar~
Check the sites you get from anomalous difference Fouriers and stick
to those as your correct HA sites. At the same time you may consider
not to refine the HA substructure on the anomalous differences but
merely using the isomorphous differences. Maybe you need to change the
sca
