A postdoc position is immediately available in my laboratory
at the Oral Biology Department, UMDNJ. The post-doc will work on the elucidation of
structure of enzymes involved in modifying A. actinomycetemconitans biofilms.
Crystals of two such enzymes are available.
Experience in expression and
A postdoc position is immediately available in the Jiang laboratory
(http://jiang.bio.purdue.edu) at the Markey Center of Structural
Biology and Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West
Lafayette, Indiana, USA. Our research focuses on structural studies of
large macromolecular com
You need to try alternative space groups, such as P6522, which has the
same extinctions and merging statistics as P6122.
What do the maps look like coming out of SOLVE/RESOLVE?
Ho
UC Berkeley
On 12:10 Fri 22 May , Francis E Reyes wrote:
> Maybe this is more of a statistics/normalization question, but say you
> have the same molecule crystallized in two different states. How would
> you put their refined b-factors (directly from the pdb) on the same
> scale and say compare the b-f
On Friday 22 May 2009 11:10:16 Francis E Reyes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Maybe this is more of a statistics/normalization question, but say you
> have the same molecule crystallized in two different states. How would
> you put their refined b-factors (directly from the pdb) on the same
> scale an
Hi all,
Maybe this is more of a statistics/normalization question, but say you
have the same molecule crystallized in two different states. How would
you put their refined b-factors (directly from the pdb) on the same
scale and say compare the b-factors of residues in the binding pocket?
Hi All,
Thanks for all the help in fixing the refmac TLS refinement issue.
The new refmac (5.5.0093) is working well so far.
Best,
Seema Mittal
On May 22, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Ronan Keegan wrote:
Hi Seema and Ben,
Garib has produced a fix for the TLS problem and put the update on
his re
Dear Paul,Thanks. Now is running. Before in earlier version it was not required.
Raja
From: Paul Leonard
To: Raja Dey
Cc: ccp4bb@jiscmail.ac.uk
Sent: Friday, 22 May, 2009 10:31:51 AM
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] SCALEPACK2MTZ failed
Dear Raja,
Where you have the
Dear Raja,
Where you have the input option
Use "dataset name" as identifier to append column labels.
Change this to "user defined identifier" and put a name in the box below.
I think Scalepack should then run ok after that.
Paul
> Dear Friends,
> I got the following erro
Dear Raja,
This is a known bug in version 6.1.1. There is a fix for it available
from the CCP4 problems pages. See item no. 7 in the following page:
http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/problems.php#6.1.1-ccp4i
You'll need to download "import_scaled.script" and replace the version
that you have in:
/sw/s
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Tim Gruene wrote:
> this usually means that you have a second version of phaser installed, e.g.
> from the phenix package. To find out, go to a terminal from which you would
> start ccp4i and type 'which phaser'. My guess is that the answer to that
> command does
Dear Friends,
I got the following error while running SCALEPACK2MTZ in
the latest version of CCP4 Program Suite 6.1.1 CCP4Interface 2.0.4 running on a
macbook with intel core 2 duo. I also tried to run earlier SCALEPACK2MTZ job
which was successfully finished before, but no
hi Sravanti -
Something that is unclear from your message, is that if you used Phaser
for a SAD phasing or molecular replacement.
I assume that latter.
Starting from molecular replacement models at 3.0 A is very tough.
Unless the identity/similarity of the search model and expected model
is ver
Hello all and apologies for the cross posting and to non-UK residents for
the cluttering of their inboxes.
Just to let you know that we will be holding the popular Northern
universities CCP4-sponsored protein structure workshop again this September
(see advert below). This year it will again be i
Here is a summary of responses to the thread I recently started on "phasing
with se-met at low resolution":
There were many suggestions. They can be grouped into two categories:
1. Aim for very high redundancy at one wavelength (peak) and watch out for
radiation damage. Sacrificing resolution is
15 matches
Mail list logo
