When last I checked a few months ago, of the 12 implicated structures only
4 had been moved to the PDB's repository of obsolete structures.
Eric
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Randy Read wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's hard to believe this has gone on so long, but the situation doesn't
> seem to have c
Hi all,
This is probably a really bad question, but are there any examples of Trp
acting as a nucleophile at all in literature? I can't imagine it can, but I
thought I'd ask just to make sure from people who know more than I.
Thanks and sorry for the offtopic question.
Peter
Hi,
It's hard to believe this has gone on so long, but the situation doesn't seem
to have changed since the wwPDB put up a statement about this case in December
2009: http://www.wwpdb.org/UAB.html. This explains the wwPDB policy that
entries are only made obsolete when the corresponding paper
Hi,
Sorry Eric I don't have an answer for your question.
off topic:
>From the University's announcement (
http://main.uab.edu/Sites/reporter/articles/71570/) you would have thought
that they had asked for this entry to be removed.
But if I understand correctly, this is is completely at the discr
Hi,
Seems not officially retracted from Nature either. On the paper's web page,
there was only a line in small font read like this:
There is a Brief Communications Arising (9 August 2007) associated with this
document.
It took me more than half an hour to find this line. I normally won't rea
Dear CCP4 Users,
A CCP4 update has just been released, consisting of the following changes:
* Aimless: Improvements to the CCP4i interface to Aimless
* MrBUMP: Some changes to the output for compatibility with QtRView
* Xia2: Updated to version 0.3.5.0
* Areaimol: Fix for already allocated array
It's an interesting story. Even before 9/11, the tablet collection was the
subject of debates on ethics in archaeological circles. Such tablets were
sometimes from private collectors and probably obtained from looters on the
black market. Reading them (the insides could be x-rayed ... tomography
At risk of lengthening an already silly, off-topic discussion ... there have
been good arguments here in the past on why re-processing archived data can
yield important new information. But in the very long run I think, protein
structures will be all figured out and new technology will allow fo
Highly redundant self-identifying DNA fragments are probably the way to
go, but
electron lithography on silicon wafers is a well-supported technology
that, even
without a protective layer would outlast paper or clay, and with
transparent protective
encapsulation, would last longer than we are li
In terms of information density clay, paper and suchlike are not likely to
be competitive with any modern storage device. However, if there really is
a serious need to store relatively large amounts of information for a
really long time I see no issues with laser (or afm) engraving on thin gold
lay
But why? I thought the idea emanating from the thread was to go the other way
around for long time archival, i.e. computer --> Sumerian (or Babylonian) clay.
Boaz
Boaz Shaanan, Ph.D.
Dept. of Life Sciences
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Beer-Sheva 84105
Israel
E-mail: bshaa...@
This is too funny. My wife's new job is scanning Sumerian clay tablets into
computer. I kid you not.
On Dec 12, 2012, at 5:35 PM, Laura Spagnolo wrote:
> I would definitely go for babylonian clay...
>
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2012, at 10:31 PM, Adrian Goldman wrote:
>
>> I say write them out onto a
Dear Colleagues,
We announce a call for synchrotron beam time applications in biological
small-angle scattering (SAXS) and macromolecular crystallography (MX).
The beamtime will be available at the PETRA-III storage ring from
March, 1st, 2013 to June, 30th, 2013.
In biological SAXS, we offer acc
Tracking Code
246-419
Title/Position:Staff Scientist, Enzymology
Summary
ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc. is seeking an independent and highly motivated staff
scientist in enzymology to join our small molecule oncology drug discovery
team. The successful candidate will play a key rol
That's because they are Harker peaks which for good reasons are
unsuitable as translation search vectors. The Patterson function is well
explained in many of the standard crystallographic texts (e.g.
Giacovazzo's book that I already recommended) and maybe you need to read
these before asking your n
Dear professor George Sheldrick,
I am so sorry to bother you again!
From the shelxc_fa.lst file, we can find that the Patterson peaks will be
selected only when the 'Mult' equal to 1..
shelxc_fa.lst:
Patterson (* indicates vector selected for search)
X Y ZHeight Mult
Hi,
2HR0 I would stay far away from that one! It is a made up model, not
based on any real data. Unfortunately, for reasons unclear to me, this
structure has still not been retracted from the PDB. This B factor could
just be a figment of the senior authors imagination
https://www.jiscmail
I'm well aware of that. Since I'm looking for outliers in the PDB, avoiding
2HR0 is the opposite of what I want to be doing. ;)
I only picked it for my example because it's one of a few IDs I have
memorized. :)
Eric
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Michael Hadders wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2HR0 I w
18 matches
Mail list logo