Re: [ccp4bb] Resolution mismatch aimless/refmac

On 18 Mar 2018, at 16:02, Eleanor Dodson wrote: > Does it matter? The refinement will only use observed reflections. It should not matter for refinement and map calculations (needs to be checked carefully). However it does matter for deposition when multiple entries

Re: [ccp4bb] Resolution mismatch aimless/refmac

Does it matter? The refinement will only use observed reflections. As Andrew says your output from dataprocessing includes a complete list of all possible* indices* to the upper resolution limit with a Free R flag assigned to the indices. This makes it easier to keep the same FreeR assignments for

Re: [ccp4bb] Resolution mismatch aimless/refmac

Dear All, As far as I know it could happen when you are using i2. We are working to fix this problem. At the moment the best solution is to use advanced options in the refmac interface and define resolution limits explicitly. For example you can add in the advanced options: resolution 37 2.5

Re: [ccp4bb] Resolution mismatch aimless/refmac

Hi Orru, If you have used the normal CCP4 processing pipeline, the data from AIMLESS will go into the “uniqueifyy” script that adds all possible reflections to the MTZ file (down to the lowest possible resolution for your unit cell dimensions), so that might explain why the low

[ccp4bb] Resolution mismatch aimless/refmac

Dear All, I am noticing that the low resolution in the reflections files after scaling with aimless and after refinement with refmac does not coincide. In a case I have 37A with aimless but for some reason refmac is 67A. Any idea? All the best, R.