Hi Bernhard,
While I do not disagree with anything you have said, there is an error in your
computation. Your results are based on the assumption of a 40-hour work week
and one-month vacation in a year.
I don't know about now but back then Russian scientists did not work like that.
So, the
More re disulfide bonds:
http://www.phenix-online.org/newsletter/CCN_2015_01.pdf#page=13
Pavel
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 11:26 PM, 张士军 <21620150150...@stu.xmu.edu.cn> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I got a structure which has COA in it, and the SH in the tail of COA
> is very close to the SH side chain of
I was just fascinated by the math: 800 x 3 = 2400, and given a
work year of 1600 hrs this makes for 1.5 papers per hr to review…
I don’t remember a reference to anyone specific - YS had only about 2000 papers
–
so maybe there are/were even more prolific candidates
Best, BR
From:
Dear Bernhard,
I agree with you sentiments, but was wondering which 'poor Russian small
molecule crystallographer' you had in mind?
Yuri Strutchkov died in 1995. He was an excellent crystallographer but
with an efficient team and good connections.
I can't really complain, all the fake
It seems that your CoA is one carbon out of reference. You have spotty
difference density over the ligand. Shift it left by one carbon bond and
redune to see if density fits better.
Artem
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018, 02:26 张士军 <21620150150...@stu.xmu.edu.cn> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I got a structure which
Yes, there is a problem in general with these ‘get rich quick with user data’
facebookoid sites. Publon seems to be another one and I had what can be
charitably described
as a pretty intense exchange with the dude running it. Nothing can be free (a
concept occasionally alien
to the purist
Bernhard, did you know that Researchgate is a controversial organization?
They have been criticised for encouraging users to upload copyrighted
material, see below. Their business model also seems to involve charging a
high fee to spam their users - we tried it once but decided we were just
Indeed: http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.154712.html
-- Ian
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 at 11:45, CAVAZZA Christine 202795 <
christine.cava...@cea.fr> wrote:
> Yes, but one of the S atoms is not well positioned in the electron
> density. And it is a disulfide bond (S-S) and not a disulfate
Yes, but one of the S atoms is not well positioned in the electron density. And
it is a disulfide bond (S-S) and not a disulfate bond.
Christine
De : CCP4 bulletin board De la part de Eleanor Dodson
Envoyé : mercredi 4 juillet 2018 12:18
À : CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Objet : Re: [ccp4bb] disulfate
That’s because the ones om the left seem to be dragged into the wrong density.
Sphere refine in Coot should clear that right up. After that it may very well
look like a disulfide.
Cheers,
Robbie
Sent from my Windows 10 phone
From: CCP4 bulletin board on
Hmm - the "S" atoms look too close - S=S bond ~ 2A
Eleanor
On 4 July 2018 at 07:26, 张士军 <21620150150...@stu.xmu.edu.cn> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I got a structure which has COA in it, and the SH in the tail of COA
> is very close to the SH side chain of Cys in the structure. I don't know
> whether
11 matches
Mail list logo
